sector. Accordingly, the researcher further emphasized on the fact that a new management model in organizations could be adopted, whether public or private. The criticism of the bureaucracy and the rise of the superiority of private management systems in relation to public administration, materialized on a set of fundamental principles: decentralization, deregulation and delegation.
1. Decentralization as a fundamental principle for organizations can acquire creativity and innovation, implying at the same time reducing hierarchical levels. To Harris (2009), this is an essential process as public managers are unable to manage projects and people, merely to manage processes and systems.
2. Deregulation as a way for managers can intervene directly in the management of financial, human and material resources, in an attempt to achieve organizational goals. Rules and regulations disappear and managers are responsible for their actions and their decisions. 3. Delegation of powers as a form of political power to depart from the concerns of day management and implementation of policies. Defined the organization 's objectives, Policy makers should refrain from intervening in its management. In general, the managerial paradigm based on the assumption that both organizations public or private, can be managed according to the same principles, although the public organizations seeking to meet social and global interests be controlled for political power (Mayne, 2007). The introduction of a new set of policies and practices in Public administration in several countries, called "New Public Management" or New Public administration was introduced. …show more content…
According to Hood (2007), this term designates a set of broadly similar doctrines that dominated the agenda of bureaucratic reform in many OECD countries since the end of The 70 's.This reform of the public sector under the influence of New Public Management started in the UK with the entrance of Margaret Thatcher 's government in 1979 and main theoretical influence the ideologies of the "New Right", which opposed the intervention in the State economy. Although it can be theoretically included in the managerial paradigm (Hood, 2007) .New Public Management stands out from the traditional public management as it features have greater clarity in their characteristics. In his work, Hood (2007) establishes a clear connection between the macro process the development of America and the micro process of evaluating public performance management. Researchers suggest that the agenda for the modernization of the state, administrative reform and performance evaluation of organizations are prerequisites to promote a development agenda that includes macroeconomic stability, greater equity, most effective of resources and sustainable economic growth allocation. Conceptually, this argument makes sense: governance is the mediator between the implementation of public policies made in the field of politics and results obtained from its implementation in the field of administration. Improved management in public organizations charges a strategic perspective in this context of institutional consolidation. Itis to improve the productivity of public spending, making more and better paying the funds allocated to the various items of the state budget, so that even users of public services who are more demanding and more reluctant taxpayers find tax provision justified government of public goods and other state intervention in the economy (Hood, 2007). The authors say that better management of public spending improves the image of the state and increases its legitimacy; frees up resources that can be applied to meet the needs of lower …show more content…
The new public management and the reinvention of governance are the two most significant reform movements in recent years, coming from UK and United States of America. These models advocate market logic and the adoption of techniques and instruments of private management to solve the problems of effectiveness and efficiency of public services, in an attempt to improve the quality of service to citizen service. Some reviews have pointed to these models, mainly due to the structural characteristics of the public sector and increase in the number of scandals related to some ethical principles in the management of public services. In this line appears in the public sphere, a new management model already used in many private sector organizations, corporate governance, which calls for responsible management and transparent oriented civil society and for greater autonomy and participation of citizens. In this paradigm shift, the management of human resources has taken on new roles. A purely administrative and bureaucratic personnel management with unique concerns of law enforcement witnessed a human resources management, concerned with the development of human capital, with their motivation and satisfaction of
1. Decentralization as a fundamental principle for organizations can acquire creativity and innovation, implying at the same time reducing hierarchical levels. To Harris (2009), this is an essential process as public managers are unable to manage projects and people, merely to manage processes and systems.
2. Deregulation as a way for managers can intervene directly in the management of financial, human and material resources, in an attempt to achieve organizational goals. Rules and regulations disappear and managers are responsible for their actions and their decisions. 3. Delegation of powers as a form of political power to depart from the concerns of day management and implementation of policies. Defined the organization 's objectives, Policy makers should refrain from intervening in its management. In general, the managerial paradigm based on the assumption that both organizations public or private, can be managed according to the same principles, although the public organizations seeking to meet social and global interests be controlled for political power (Mayne, 2007). The introduction of a new set of policies and practices in Public administration in several countries, called "New Public Management" or New Public administration was introduced. …show more content…
According to Hood (2007), this term designates a set of broadly similar doctrines that dominated the agenda of bureaucratic reform in many OECD countries since the end of The 70 's.This reform of the public sector under the influence of New Public Management started in the UK with the entrance of Margaret Thatcher 's government in 1979 and main theoretical influence the ideologies of the "New Right", which opposed the intervention in the State economy. Although it can be theoretically included in the managerial paradigm (Hood, 2007) .New Public Management stands out from the traditional public management as it features have greater clarity in their characteristics. In his work, Hood (2007) establishes a clear connection between the macro process the development of America and the micro process of evaluating public performance management. Researchers suggest that the agenda for the modernization of the state, administrative reform and performance evaluation of organizations are prerequisites to promote a development agenda that includes macroeconomic stability, greater equity, most effective of resources and sustainable economic growth allocation. Conceptually, this argument makes sense: governance is the mediator between the implementation of public policies made in the field of politics and results obtained from its implementation in the field of administration. Improved management in public organizations charges a strategic perspective in this context of institutional consolidation. Itis to improve the productivity of public spending, making more and better paying the funds allocated to the various items of the state budget, so that even users of public services who are more demanding and more reluctant taxpayers find tax provision justified government of public goods and other state intervention in the economy (Hood, 2007). The authors say that better management of public spending improves the image of the state and increases its legitimacy; frees up resources that can be applied to meet the needs of lower …show more content…
The new public management and the reinvention of governance are the two most significant reform movements in recent years, coming from UK and United States of America. These models advocate market logic and the adoption of techniques and instruments of private management to solve the problems of effectiveness and efficiency of public services, in an attempt to improve the quality of service to citizen service. Some reviews have pointed to these models, mainly due to the structural characteristics of the public sector and increase in the number of scandals related to some ethical principles in the management of public services. In this line appears in the public sphere, a new management model already used in many private sector organizations, corporate governance, which calls for responsible management and transparent oriented civil society and for greater autonomy and participation of citizens. In this paradigm shift, the management of human resources has taken on new roles. A purely administrative and bureaucratic personnel management with unique concerns of law enforcement witnessed a human resources management, concerned with the development of human capital, with their motivation and satisfaction of