• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/18

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

18 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Self report techniques- questionnaires

Pre set list of written questions which pps respond to. Open q:doesn’t have fixed answer,qualitative. Closed q: fixed range of answers, quantitative


EVAL of open q:


+cost effective.gathers large amounts of data quickly because can be distributed


-responses may not be truthful-social desirability bias


EVAL closed q:


+easy to analyse and draw conclusions. Can compare, make charts/graphs


-acquiescence bias-tendency to agree with questionnaire

Interviews

Structured:pre determined set of questions


Unstructured: no set questions, certain topics discussed


Semi-structure: pre determined q’sbut can ask follow up q’s

Evaluation of interviews

Structured:


+easy to replicate & reduces differences in interviews


-cannot deviate from topic or elaborate


Unstructured:


+much more flexibility,gain more insight


-analysis not as easy drawing firm conclusions difficult

Observational techniques -Naturalistic

Watching and recording behaviour in the setting within which it would normally occur


EVAL:


+high external validity-can be generalised to everyday life


-lack of control over research makes replication difficult

Observational techniques


-controlled

Watching and recording behaviour within a structured environment e.g. variables managed


EVAL:


+replication of the observation becomes easier-less extraneous variables


-produce findings that cannot be applied to real life

Observational techniques


-overt

Overt-behaviour watched with knowledge & consent


EVAL:


+more ethically acceptable


-knowledge participants are being observed May influence their behaviour

Observational techniques


-overt

Overt-behaviour watched with knowledge & consent


EVAL:


+more ethically acceptable


-knowledge participants are being observed May influence their behaviour

Observational techniques


-covert

Without knowledge & consent


EVAL:


+ensures any behaviour observed will be natural-higher validity


-ethics is an issue.participants need privacy & confidentiality

Observational techniques


-participant

Researcher becomes member of the group they’re observing


EVAL:


+gives increased insight into people being studied-increased validity


-researcher may come to identify too strongly with pox and lose objectivity

Observational techniques


-non participant

Researcher remains outside the group


EVAL:


+maintain distance from participants so keep objective


-may lose insight as they are far removed from the people they are studying

Observational techniques


-unstructured/structured

Unstructured:write down everything they see- rich detail


Structured:target behaviours are main focus of obvservation

Observational techniques


-behavioural categories

When a target behaviour is broken up into components that are observable and measurable

Correlations

Positive- as one variable increases so does the other


Negative-as one variable increases the other decreases


Zero-no relationship between variables


EVAL:


+useful preliminary tool, provides a precise measure of how variables are related


+quick to carry out


-can’t tell us WHY variables are related


-another variable may be causing the relationship

Ethical issues

DIPP


Deception- deliberately misleading or withholding info


Informed consent-making pps aware of the aims of research, procedures and their rights


Protection from harm- pps shouldn’t be put at more risk that in daily life. Are not psychologically or physically harmed


Privacy and confidentiality-have the right to control into about themselves, right of privacy, confidentially to have personal data protected.

Ethical issues

DIPP


Deception- deliberately misleading or withholding info


Informed consent-making pps aware of the aims of research, procedures and their rights


Protection from harm- pps shouldn’t be put at more risk that in daily life. Are not psychologically or physically harmed


Privacy and confidentiality-have the right to control into about themselves, right of privacy, confidentially to have personal data protected.

Dealing with ethical issues

Informed consent- Participants given consent letter with all info which is signed


Deception-at end of study participants are given full de brief


Protection from harm-BPS code of conduct, guidelines which ethic committees use to determine whether ethical


Privacy and confidentiality-told what data is use and given the right to withhold it

Kinds of data


-qualitative


-quantitative

Qualitative:data express in words-non numerical


+richness of detail,allows pps & researchers to develop thoughts/opinions.high external validity


-difficult to analyse- can’t be summarised statistically so patterns and comparisons hard to identify


Quantitative: data in form of numbers usually, that can be counted


+easier to analyse, comparisons and patterns easily drawn. More objective and less open to bias when interpreting data


-much narrower in scope so mail fail to represent ‘real life’

Kinds of data


-primary


-secondary

primary:info obtained first hand by researcher, directly from pps as part of experiment


+it is authentic data which fits what the researcher is intending to find


-requires time and effort, uses lots of prep resources & planning


Secondary:info that has already been collected by someone else eg gov stats


+inexpensive and easily assessed, may not need to get primary data


-may not be quality and accurate, may be outdated,incomplete. Also may not meet researchers objectives