• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/54

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

54 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

John Locke

children should be thought of as having similar thoughts and issues as adults, children come into the world as blank slates, viewed as passive and a product of their environment

equifinality

how might different early experiences lead to the same outcome

multifinality

same experience leads to different outcomes

reciprocal influences

development influences the course of psychopathology and vice-versa

transactional models

children aren't just a product of their environments, they select and shape the environment they grow up in

risk factors

characteristics of the environment associated with negative outcomes (ex:poverty, abuse, divorce)

vulnerability factors

characteristics of children that make them more likely to develop maladaptively (ex- internalizing tendency->depression)

protective factors

characteristics of children or the environment that buffer children from risky environments (ex:faith, self-confidence)

resillience

achieving positive outcomes despite risk

disorder-specific continuity

show similar issues throughout life

disorder-nonspecific continuity

one issue early in life->another issue later in life (ex: ODD->antisocial personality disorder)

organizational approach

development occurs in predictable ways, assumes continuity in patterns of behavior, but not specific behavior

piaget

constructivist-child is active and has control over their environment

Skinner

behavior is based on context not personality; ABCs- A=antecedents- what happens before, B=behavior, C=consequences-what happens after

positive reinforcement

do well=given something you want

negative reinforcement

negative result that will increase a certain behavior

punishment

remove positive stimulus to decrease behavior

classical conditioning

pair neutral stimulus and unconditioned stimulus to create a response

cognitive schemas

knowledge structures that guide attention, memory, and interpretation (come from life experiences)

attachment theory

establish and maintain emotional bond through relationship-enhancing behaviors (parent serves as a secure base, a safe haven)

neural plasticity

ability to change, neurons are pruned away if they're not used, they're overproduces at birth and connections are strengthened through use

gene

basic unit of info in the genome, codes for proteins and predispose you to different traits

epigenetics

genes turned on and off during development, early experiences can influence gene expression

hindbrain

pons, medulla, and tectum- responsible for basic functions like breathing

midbrain

thalamus and hypothalamus

limbic system

between brainstem and cortex- amygdala, hyppocampus and cingulate gyrus

amygdala

emotional processes

hippocampus

learning and memory

cingulate gyrus

impulse control

occipital lobe

vision

parietal

spatial reasoning

temporal

language

frontal

decision making, higher cognition

expression

how do problems change across development

comorbidity

having multiple disorders together

moderators

influence direction or strength of association between variables

mediators

process through which variable leads to an outcome->explains why

efficacy

success under well-contributed conditions (usually in a lab)

effectiveness

success in clinical practice

reliability

consistency: interrupter agreement, over time

validity

accuracy

face validity

does it seem accurate

convergent validity

use new test and proven test to prove that the new one works

discriminent validity

if anxiety and aggression are correlated-> probably not valid!

criterion validity

show your measure predicts behavior in way you expect it to in another situation

internal validity

extenet to which a variable (that we're studying) rather than another (that we aren't studying) is responsible for our results

external validity

degree to which findings can be generalized

cross-sectional design

compare children of different ages, can't see individual changes!

quasi-experiment design

use naturally occurring groups and match on important characteristics like low SES

retrospective design

chose subjects based on current traits and find info about earlier time period, may be biased

prospective design

identify sample and follow over time

prognosis

predicts the future, likelihood that symptoms will get worse over time, etc.

idiographic approach

emphasizes unique circumstances, personality, etc.

nomothetic approach

emphasizes similarities across children