Why Is Sam Houston Important

Improved Essays
Sam Houston is considered by most to be the real father of Texas. What did he do for Texas? Who is he? Why so important? This article will answer all of those questions and more. In his early life young Sam Houston was quite the troublemaker in fact, he ran away from home at a very young age! Houston’s father died at the age of thirteen and soon after Houston would run away from home to go live with the Cherokee Indians. The chief became Houston’s adopted father and he was given the Cherokee name Co-lo-neh or The Raven. When Houston was 21 and was going off into the military to help serve his country his mother gave him a ring that said Honor on it, this ring made Sam Houston decided to make his mother proud no matter what the cost. When Houston is in the military, he will be wounded multiple times. Once in the leg at San Jacinto as Antonia Lopez de Santa Anna was defeated and forced to surrender. At first when Santa Anna was defeated they didn’t know they had him in their custody as he was posing as a regular soldier to try to make it out with his life. It wasn’t until later in a Texan prison that they found out because the prisoners started yelling el presidente giving it away in a …show more content…
Throughout his election he constantly pushed the idea of annexation into the U.S and the people began to cherish this idea, as the hope of annexation grew Sam Houston decided to present it to congress. Sadly at first they refused the proposal. A lot of Americans were heavily against texas annexation because of the amount of slavery we had going on in the state. Another factor that may have deterred them from annexing the state was it’s unreal debt that had been growing and not stopping it would not be until Sam Houston’s second term he would begin to do anything about the debt. When Sam’s first term was up Lamar the next president drastically increased the debt leaving Sam Houston with a heavy project to work

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Why Martin De Leon Was Important to Texas Martin De Leon was born in 1765 in the town of Nuevo Santander[Roell]. His parents were Bernardo and María Galván De León. They immigrated from Burgos, Spain. The family was educated and were taught in Paris and had a lot of money.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Civil War was the biggest battle in World History between the Union and the Confederate. It was a bloody battle for what they thought was right and what they thought was better for them, but why did Texas fight? Texas fought for the love of the Confederate, States’ Rights, and to preserve slavery. First off, Texas fought for love. Texans loved the way of life they had and all the ways of the south.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If you ever get the chance to meet someone from Texas ask why they love Texas so much. But if you ask a Texan why they have so much pride in their state, they might not know the answer to that question.. That's because it was planted into them from everyday society in the same way that Davy Crockett was used to change the way people looked, acted, and thought, back in the earlier…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While the popular and most accepted belief was that Crockett died heroically in battle (as was clearly depicted in numerous films), the emergence of a diary written by Enrique de la Peña, a Mexican officer, who claimed “to be an eyewitness to the capture and execution of Davy Crockett in the immediate aftermath of the Battle of the Alamo” was about to send shockwaves to the historical circles. The first source that Crisp analyzed was Bill Groneman’s Defense of a Legend: Crockett and the de la Peña Diary. Groneman, a police detective and a historian, who latter would become one of Crisp’s lifelong colleagues, argued that the de la Peña diary was a forgery, thus the claim of Crockett surrendering was not accurate. The controversy surrounded Crockett’s death intrigued Crisp, who later on uncovered that de la Peña manuscripts came from J. Sánchez Garza, who had privately published them under the title La Rebelión de Texas: Manuscrito Inédito de 1836 por un Oficial de Santa Anna. After carefully studied Garza’s publication, Crisp felt that they were more questions raised than answered. Upon more digging, he discovered that de la Peña had written two separate manuscripts while he was imprisoned so Crisp arranged to get both copies and study them meticulously.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Sam Houston and the American Southwest, Randolph B. Campbell argues that Sam Houston was a great leader but with a subpar personal life for most of it. The four major moments one should pay attention to when discussing Houston’s time of leadership, are his time governing Tennessee, leading an army during the war for Texas independence, his time running Texas and lastly, his time as a member of the Senate for the state of Texas. Houston made decisions based on what he feels is the best for his people in the long run.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The citizens of Texas wanted slavery so when Lincoln was elected, they wanted to join the six other Southern states in the confederacy. Houston was brave enough to stand up for what he believed in and repelled the offer. This choice cost him the job as Governor of Texas. He sacrificed his job for his beliefs of what Texas should be. Some people called this the storm, he went through.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bibliography Randolph B. Campbell. Sam Houston and the American Southwest, Third Edition. New York: Pearson, 2006. “Sam Houston and the American Southwest” is a book authored by Campbell Randolph and is a biographical account of the life of Sam Houston, and the important role he played in the development of Southwest (Randolph, 2006). The topic and theme of study for the book is the role and the impact of Sam Houston, who was the President of an independent republic, the governor for two different states, and a US senator for thirteen years.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was America justified in going to war with Mexico? Before April 25, 1846, American you know today wasn't the same If America didn’t go to war with Mexico, American would only be half of the size it was today. This all started because Texas declared its independence from Mexico. Mexico wasn’t so thrilled about Texas actions. Which, leads to the question, was America justified to war with Mexico?…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sleuthing The Alamo In the Rhetorical analysis, Sleuthing The Alamo, James E. Crisp dives head long into an extensive evaluation of the events, people, and historical stories of the Alamo. As he began his research he stumbled across a speech written and given by Sam Houston. Houston is a well acknowled man in both Texas and U. S. history with a reputation for fairness, and being and all around good wholesome man with a polished set or morals. Upon reading a statement Houston made to his men Crisp felt as if something were wrong.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The mighty man known as Sam Houston even went to go beg on his knees to her, but she didn’t care for him. This course of action eventually led up to him resigning his position of governor of Tennessee at the time because of the controversy caused with his alcoholism and the departure of his marriage. Furthermore, a congressman by the name of William Stanberry, once attempted to accuse Houston of fraud. Houston then ended up beating the poor congressman down with his cane and left him bleeding in the street. This caused Houston to go to trial and ultimately own a fine of $500, which was later revoked when Andrew Jackson became…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Executive Branch Have you ever ask yourself if the state level executive branch is important? The answer is most defiantly yes, every branch of the state and federal government matter because of something called checks and balances. Checks and balances is a system that was created to make sure no branch of power gets more power than the other. Critics in the past have made points and arguments that the Texas Government is out of date, the governors office of Texas appears to be weak when it comes to granted powers from the constitution on paper.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While America began to expand and become more industrialize, not everybody agreed with the ideas and concepts. Due to the difference in opinion there was a lot of controversy and voiced opinions about the westward expansions. While some Americans supported Westward expansions, there was others who opposed Westward expansions. Also some Americans supported the Mexican War, while others opposed the Mexican war. However, both the Westward expansion and the Mexican war had positive and negative effects to the country we live in today.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Territorial Expansion DBQ

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the greatest developments of the 19th century was the Industrial Revolution, as it paved the way for a new way of living in America. New forms of technology and transportation contributed to the increased expansion from the established eastern cities to the western frontier. Although this expansion created many new possibilities, there was still people who felt expansion was detrimental to the nation. Between 1800 and 1855, supporters and opponents of territorial expansion influenced federal government policy by urging the government to act, or not to, on expansion debate that would affect the future of the nation. During the 1800’s, America was ready to expand but the French held control of New Orleans and the Louisiana territory,…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As The United states began a time of expansion into the west in the late 1830’s, debates over whether or not slavery would be permitted in those territories vacated by the native Americans caused great disagreements in Government and Society. While slavery is the most obvious reason for succession, Westward expansion and the rights of the new states were responsible for much of the violent conflicts that lead to the Civil War. States struggled to find common ground, but the differences between North and South and new Immigration made A series of compromises were created but by 1860 compromise had failed. Southerners feared an increase in free states would create an imbalance of power and create an advantage to the abolition of slavery.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Others believed that the Mexican government was to blame for viewing the people of Texas as of little importance. In fact there were a number of factors that led to the revolution. Probably the greatest cause of the Texas…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays