Family intergenerational style (as we are told) is the level of authority that is exercised by the older generation, as well as how much time and attention they devote to the development of the younger generation. This concept, in my opinion, is no different than that of any other type of firm or governing body. Nobody wants to work under or alongside a person who exhibits autocratic behavior (even if they are family), as this can often be seen as demeaning. As can be seen in the Bingham case this can have a direct negative impact on the operations of a family business. In the case Bingham, Sr., was not completely open with the rest of the family (on topics such as commitment to continuity) and overused misused his power greatly (making a decision to sell the company before a consensus had been reached. Although this example shows a case of negative intergenerational style this is not always the case, and when done right intergenerational style can have a direct correlation to the success of a family business. The level in which family members share worldviews, norms, and values is called family cohesion. Cohesion of a family contribute to the emotional intelligence, unity, and shared vision of the family as it pertains to a business. According to the article by Prof. Miller (from Frontiers in Psychology), “a true shared vision drives strategy, gives meaning to work, and …show more content…
According to the readings, family meetings are a major part of family process – serving as a way to educate family members on information related to the wellbeing and activities of the company. Family meetings are believed to help the family become stronger, both as it pertains to a business and general relationship. We see an example in the Blethens case, as well as the Biltmore case, how family meetings can contribute to a heathier business. In the Blethens case, family meetings were a central governing body for the company. This both increased family cohesion and exhibited a very positive intergenerational style, leading to decades of success for the family business. We gain similar insight from the Biltmore case, as they view family meetings as a way to both educate family and have fun. Family process, although discussed last here, can have a direct impact on both family cohesion and perceived intergenerational style when the ideal methods are not used.
These three categories (which combine to for family climate) – intergenerational style, family cohesion, and family process – can directly affect the success and longevity of a family business, if not any business. It is made evident through this week’s readings just how family climate can differ between businesses (through the Biltmore, Bingham, and Blethens cases) and how these differences can cause differences in the health of these