Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
12 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
What are low constraint research methods?
|
* Naturalistic observation
*Archival research *Surveys *Case Studies *Program Evaluation *field Experiments |
|
When is low-constrain research useful?
|
-When investigating natural flow of behavior in natural settings
-When conducting exploratory research -When trying to familiarize with participants and settings -when trying to generalize lab findings to real world -When trying to find contingent relationships among events |
|
What does this research provide?
|
- New descriptive info.
-possible hypothesis for later higher-constrained research -evidence to negate general proposition -information about contingencies |
|
What type of problem statements should you have when you conduct this type of research?
|
-very general
|
|
What do you need to be aware of in terms of your hypothesis when you conduct this type of research?
|
-it will evolve as you make more observations.
|
|
What are the important points to remember when you make observations in this type of research?
|
-do not bias observations
- be aware of ethical issues -be aware of sampling issues |
|
what does it mean by "reactive Measure"?
|
-enhance reactivity
|
|
why are ethical issues particularly difficult to deal with when you are conducting this type of research?
|
-because no informed consent is involved
|
|
what are sampling issues that you need to deal with when you are conducting low-constraint research?
|
-representation of participants
-behavior -settings |
|
how should you deal with poor representativeness?
|
-make observations across variety of participants, behaviors, settings
|
|
Why is replicability a problem for this type of research?
|
-procedures are often not specified
-they may change as the study continues -they are often unique to the observer -therefore, replication is difficult |
|
what does it mean by the ex post facto fallacy?
|
*DEF: interpreting an observed contingency as if it represented causal connection
-low-constraint observation will never provide the controls for such strong conclusions. * if the ex post facto conclusions are interpreted as hypothesis to be studied, and not as established facts, they serve a useful scientific purpose. |