• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/29

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

29 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

an ethical approach that believes that there are moral absolutes in the world and all actions are anchored into it

moral absolutism

it is an absolute standard to be followed by people regardless of their age, culture, gender, and the event or circumstances that they are in.

moral absolutism

the standards are in no way should be compromised for it is absolute

moral absolutism

it is usually adopted and practiced by religious such as christianism

moral absolutism

there are no objective moral values or normative facts

moral anti-realism

which holds that there are objective moral values such a that moral claim may be either true or false.

moral realism

the view that there are facts of the matter about which actions are right and which wrong, and about which things are good and which bad.

moral realism

is the position that ethical sentences express propositions that refer to objective features of the world, some of which may be true to the extent that they report those features

moral realism

no objective moral values or normative facts

moral anti-realism

objective moral values and any moral claim is therefore either true or false

moral realism

the idea that there is no universal or absolute set of moral principles

moral relativism

it's a version of morality that advocates "to each her own,"and those who follow it say, "who am i to judge?"

moral relativism

is on the opposite end of the continuum from moral absolutism, which says that there is always one right answer to any ethical question.

moral relativism

"all similarly situated individuals", regardless of culture, race, sex, religion, nationality, sexuality, or any other distinguishing feature.

moral universalism

is opposed to moral nihilism and moral relativism

moral universalism

believes that nothing is right or wrong

moral nihilism

is the metaethical view that nothing is morally right or morally wrong and that morality doesn't exist

moral nihilism

a belief that there are no absolute morals that apply to everyone, because they can change and be given meaning by humans.

moral nihilism

refers to doubt about moral arguments and judgements about right and wrong

moral skepticism

includes dogmatic skepticism that denies the possibility of moral knowledge and practical skepticism which examines whether moral judgements makes sense and should be applied.

moral skepticism

is a meta ethical view that ethical propositions do not express statements and therefore must not be true or false

non cognitivism

disagree with the cognitivist claim that "moral judgements explain the characteristics of the world and may be objectively true"

non-cognitivism

disagree with someone saying "'eating meat is wrong' is a false statement"

non-cognitivism

a theory of learning that focuses on processes of the mind

cognitivism

states that the way we learn is determined by the way our mind takes in, stores, processes, and then accesses information.

cognitivism

an ethical theory that determines right from wrong by focusing on outcomes

utilitarianism

holds that the most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good for the greatest number

utilitarianism

belief that it is right if it tends to promote happiness or pleasure and wrong if it tends to produce an happiness or pain, not just for the performer of the action but also for everyone else affected by it.

utilitarianism

believe that the purpose of morality is to make life better by increasing the amount of good things in the world and decreasing the amount of bad things

utilitarians