• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/33

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

33 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Philosophy (Rand)

“Study of existence, of a man, and of man’s relationship to existence.”

Rights (Rand)

(Rand is not a Rights theorist) “A right is a moral principle defining and sanctioning a man’s freedom of action in a social context…”

Justice (Rawls)

A characteristic set of principles for assigning basic rights and duties and for determining what they take to be the proper distribution of the benefits and burdens of social cooperation.

Hypernorms (Donaldson & Dunfee)

“Moral precepts fundamental to all human beings.”

Price gouging (Zwolinski)

“A practice in which prices on certain kinds of necessary items are raised in the wake of an emergency to what appear to be unfair or exploitatively high levels.”

Stakeholder (Donaldson & Preston)

Stakeholders are persons or groups with legitimate interests in procedural and/or substantive aspects of corporate activity.

Corporate governance (Ryan)

Roles, responsibilities, and balance of power among executives, directors, and shareholders.

Shareholder activism (Goranova & Ryan)

Actions taken by shareholders with explicit intention of influencing corporations, policies, and practices.

Moral philosophy vs. moral psychology

Moral philosophy: Is the study of how people should behave in moral situations




Moral psychology: Is the study of how people behave in moral situations

Negative rights vs. positive rights

Negative rights: The right to PURSUE something




Positive rights: The right TO something (like a cake)

Utilitarian vs. rights justifications of capitalism

Utilitarian justifications of capitalism: Capitalism is the economic system that best maximizes the common good




Rights justifications of capitalism: Capitalism is the only economic system that respects fundamental human rights, such as property rights and freedom of association

Subjective egoism vs. objective egoism

Subjective egoism: Decides what’s moral based on what’s good for me in the short term; Humans are fundamentally different, therefore cannot judge




Objective egoism: Decides what’s moral based on what’s good for me in the long term; Humans are fundamentally similar, therefore can judge

Absolutism vs. relativism

Absolutism: Is some moral rules stay the same through time and space




Relativism: Morality itself changes through time and space

Collectivism vs. individualism

Collectivism: Humans are fundamentally members of groups.




Individualism: Humans are fundamentally individuals who can join groups.

Be able to recreate Donaldson and Preston’s stakeholder “target.”

Explain briefly the terms descriptive, instrumental, and normative.

Descriptive: How managers do treat their stakeholders




Instrumental: How managers should treat their stakeholders in order to achieve a certain goal




Normative: How managers should treat their stakeholders because it is the right or moral thing to do, even at the expense of profits

(1) Dormant Stakeholder

Have power nothing else, little or no action; Ex. Ex-employee that know stuff such as trade secrets

(2) Discretionary Stakeholder

No pressure on company; most likely to receive philanthropy

(3) Demanding Stakeholder

Urgency but nothing else; irksome and annoying; not dangerous (no power)

(4) Dominant Stakeholder

Have influence, power and legitimacy but no urgency; Ex. Happy shareholders with no reason to interfere

(5) Dangerous Stakeholder

Power and urgency; coercive or possibly violent; Ex. Someone in lobby with dynamite

(6) Dependent Stakeholder

Legitimacy and urgency with no power; dependent on a third party

(7) Definitive Stakeholder

Have power, urgency, and legitimacy; Ex. Angry shareholders

Power

The extent to which they have the means to impose their will.

Legitimacy

Socially accepted structures or behaviors (society decides)

Urgency

Consists of 2 things: time sensitive and critical

How do these circles intersect?

Latent (one circle), expectant (2 circles), or definitive (3 circles)

Generally, what is stakeholder management?

“Stakeholder management requires, as its key attribute, simultaneous attention to the legitimate interests of all appropriate stakeholders.”

What was the original definition of a stakeholder?

“Anyone who can affect or be affected by the firm.”

What is Donaldson’s and Preston’s definition?

“Stakeholders are persons or groups with legitimate interests in procedural and/or substantive aspects of corporate activity.”

According to Donaldson and Preston, what are the two assumptions that must be accepted for the theory to work?

The theory’s “fundamental basis is normative and involves the acceptance of the following ideas:


(a) Stakeholders are persons or groups with legitimate interests in procedural and/or substantive aspects of corporate activity. Stakeholders are identified by their interest in the corporation, whether or not the corporation has any corresponding functional interest in them.


(b) The interests of all stakeholders are of intrinsic value

What are the three normative justifications that have been offered to support the core of the theory?

The Kantian justification: use others merely as a means; trying to get rid of instrumental and left with normative




The feminist ethic of care justification: align stakeholder and feminine care




The pluralist property rights justification: if you use social contract theory use multiple theories; everyone owns the firm, everyone is taken care of; the problem is that ethical theories all contradict each other

What are the four problems with the stakeholder theory?

The stakeholder definition problem → Who are the stakeholders?


The intrinsic value problem


The priority/balancing problem → How can you keep everyone happy?


The normative justification problem → Needs a strong moral representation