• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/32

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

32 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
collusion
the act of working with another person on an academic undertaking for which a student is individually responsible
example of collusion
two people working om a homework assignment that only one person gets credit for
conspiracy
the planning or acting with one or more persons ro commit any form of academic dishonesty to gain academic advantage for yourself or another
example of conspiracy
a group of peple plan to cheat on the test
plagiarism
the act of appropriating another writings or works and making use of the ideas or work, implied. is the notion that by so doing one is "stealing" original work produced by another
example of plagiarism
getting your sisters old paper and turning it in as your own
cheating
looking on someones test
misrepresentation
any act or omission with intent to deceive an instructor for academic advantage
example of misrepresentation
making the teacher think you went to a library but u really went to Google
ethics
the reasoned study of what is morally right and wrong, good or bad. ethics is part of the broader field of philosophy, critical thinking about moral problems
ethical issues
questions, problems, situations, or actions that contain illegitimate questions of moral right or wrong
critical thinking
informed and logical thought, or logical problem solving
situation ethics
determining what is right or good solely on the basis of the momentary context, this implies that what is right or good today in this situation may not be right tomorrow in another situation
relativism
the assumption that there are no moral standards, judgments, or principles that apply to everyone, that what is morally right and wrong varies from one person to another, or one culture to another
absolutism
the belief that there are no matter of opinion in ethics since all moral judgments are the same for everyone
legalism
the belief that ethical discussussiones are unnecessary since we have laws to govern peoples behavior, or that ethical standards are really the same
evil
the continuing atrocities of which humans are capable.
moral judgments
conclusions as to whether specific actions are ethically right or wrong, the ability to make the right ethical disisiones
moral character
possessing the courage/ determination, and persistence to follow through and do what we know we ought to do
Lawrence kohlbergs 3 levels of moral development broken down in six stages
1: punishment and obiediance 2:instrument and relativity, interpersonal concordance,4. law and order, 5. social contract, 6. universal ethical principle
argument
a series of statements which claims to prove a logical point
logic
the branch of philosophy that deals with thinking and reasoning processes
fallacy
an illogical argument, oftem appearing logical at first glance, involving a statement or statements that in one way or another deceive or mislead
valid
logically correct
invalid
illogical. a deductive argument is said to be invalid if the structure of the deductive argument is not logically correct
sound
an argument is said to be sound if the grounds can be proven true
unsound
an argument is said to be unsound if the grounds are not true, or ca not be proven true
egoism
emphasize the aim of always acting for perceived self interest
act of utilitarianism
from Jeremy Bentham, maintains the right thing to do in any situation is the action that produces the greatest possible good for the greatest number
rule utilitarianism
from John stuart Mill, maintaines the right thing to do is to follow the moral rule that would produce the greatest possible good, if everyone followed it
golden mean
Aristotle definition of virtues as being perfectly balanced between opposing undesirable extremes
veil of ignorance
rawlsian principle that requires that each person put aside any persononal considerations, as if we each wore blindfolds. this ensures that no one is advantaged or disadvantaged in the choice of principle by the outcome of natural chance or the contingency of social circumstances