Capstone Mod 5

Front 1

The First Amendment protects American’s rights to freedom of religion and ____.

Back 1

freedom of expression

Front 2

The Supreme Court has held that this form of speech is not protected by the First Amendment and may be forbidden by the government: ____.

Back 2

perjury

Front 3

Miller v. California is the Supreme Court case that established a test to determine ____

Back 3

if material is obscene

Front 4

The problem with the Communications Decency Act was its broad language and vague definition of ____, resulting in the Act being ruled unconstitutional.

Back 4

indecency

Front 5

after a three judge federal panel ruled unanimously that the Communications Decency Act unconstitutionally restricted ____, the government appealed to the Supreme Court in a case that became known as Reno v. ACLU.

Back 5

free speech

Front 6

Privacy advocacy groups such as the Electronic Privacy Information Center, the ACLU, and the Electronic Frontier Foundation claimed that the language in the Child Online Protection Act was overly vague and limited the ability of ____ to access material protected under the First Amendment.

Back 6

adults

Front 7

The ____ Act is still in effect and has not been ruled unconstitutional.

Back 7

Children’s Internet Protection

Front 8

Organizations may direct their network administrators to install a(n) ____ on employee’s computers to prevent them from viewing sites that contain pornography or other objectionable material.

Back 8

Internet filter

Front 9

In the Internet Content Rating Association’s Web site rating scheme, ____ fill out an online questionnaire to describe the content of the Web site.

Back 9

Web site authors

Front 10

The Children’s Internet Protection Act ____.

Back 10

attempted to protect children from accessing pornography and other explicit material online

Front 11

Proponents of the Children’s Internet Protection Act argued that ____.

Back 11

schools and libraries could elect to not implement the program, they just would not receive Federal money for Internet access

Front 12

Implementing the Children’s Internet Protection Act is more difficult for a library than a school because ____.

Back 12

the library’s services are open to people of all ages

Front 13

In United States v. American Library Association, the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, held that public libraries ____.

Back 13

must purchase filtering software and comply with all portions of the Children’s Internet Protection Act

Front 14

Anonymous expression is ____.

Back 14

the expression of opinions by people who do not reveal their identity

Front 15

Anonymous expression in the U.S. began around the time of ____.

Back 15

the American Revolution

Front 16

____ was a printer who was prosecuted for seditious libel because s(he) refused to reveal the names of anonymous authors whose writings were critical of the governor of new York.

Back 16

John Zenger

Front 17

A pamphlet called ____ was published by Thomas Paine and critiqued the British monarchy and urged the colonies to become independent.

Back 17

Common Sense

Front 18

One of the first rulings by the Supreme Court to address anonymity as an aspect of the Bill or Rights was the 1958 case ____.

Back 18

NAACP v. Alabama

Front 19

In U.S. Navy v. America Online, a sailor used a pseudonym to post information that ____

Back 19

suggested that he might be gay

Front 20

A(n) ____ is a numeric identifier assigned to each computer connected to the Internet.

Back 20

IP address

Front 21

Internet users who want to remain anonymous can send e-mail to a(n) ____ service, which uses software to strip the originating IP address from the message.

Back 21

anonymous remailer

Front 22

An organization’s IT department can set up a(n) ____ to prohibit employees from accessing remailers.

Back 22

firewall

Front 23

The use of a remailer keeps communications anonymous; what is communicated, and whether it is ethical or legal, ____.

Back 23

is up to the user of the remailer

Front 24

A(n) ____ is often filed against a defendant whose identity is temporarily unknown

Back 24

John Doe lawsuit

Front 25

In the United States, speech that is merely annoying, critical, demeaning, or offensive enjoys protection under the First Amendment. Legal recourse is possible only when that speech turns into clear threats and intimidation against ____.

Back 25

specific citizens