Writs Of Certiorari: Writ Of Superior Court

Decent Essays
Writs of Certiorari

Merriam-Webster dictionary defines writ of certiorari as a writ of Superior Court to call up record of an inferior court or a body acting in a quasi-judicial capacity. Certiorari is the general method most cases make their way to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court since it has specific jurisdiction over a very limited range of disputes. For example, the Supreme Court order a lower court to send the record, and it usually hear the cases, if it has national significance and value. However, the court is not under any obligation to hear these cases, unless they have been decided in either a U.S. Court of Appeals or the highest Court in a given state. In general, the Supreme Court has its own set of rules to following in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the case, Brady v. Maryland 373 U.S. 83, Certiorari was granted to a decision of the Court of Appeals of Maryland to consider whether petitioner was denied a federal right when the appeals court restricted its grant of a new murder trial to the question of punishment, leaving the determination of guilt undisturbed. The appeals court granted a retrial after holding that suppression of evidence by the state violated petitioner's rights under the Due Process Clause, U.S. Constitutional Amendment XIV (Law School Case Briefs, 2013). Furthermore, there was a judgement that had granted the petitioner a new murder trial that was solely based on the issue of his punishment. Since the petitioner was convicted of murder and then sentenced to death in his first trail with the Maryland Court, the petitioner was then informed that the Maryland Courts had withheld a statement that indicated that another individual had admitted that exact homicide. What the Supreme Court had concluded from this case was that, because of the suppression of the evidence was in favorable to an accused upon the request that violated the Due Process Clause required the court to a…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I went to Kings County Supreme Court. Its located at 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn NY at September 21 at 2:30 pm to 4:40 pm under Honor Francois A. Rivera from Part 52. The case type was civil and type of the proceedings is a trial. There were 8 jurors in the stand. Mostly male and about 2 females juror.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    FACTS: Petitioner was charged in Florida with breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor; this offense is a felony in Florida. The petitioner asked the trial court to appoint counsel, but the court denied the request. The petitioner was found guilty and sentenced to 5 years in prison. The petitioner then filed in the Florida Supreme Court for habeas corpus arguing that the refusal of the trial court to appoint counsel denied him of constitutional rights, but was denied the relief. The case before the U.S. Supreme Court is a Writ of Certiorari.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout its long history, when the Court needed to affirm its legitimacy, it has cited Marshall's opinion in Marbury v. Madison” (McBride). This case answered the question that the Courts do have the authority to interpret the Constitution and declare acts by Congress and the President unconstitutional. When laws are in contrary to the Constitution, it is the duty of the Courts to review and resolve the issues and apply a decision correct to the law. Lastly, the case set a precedence and brought forward with emphasis that the Constitution is the law of the land and the Supreme Court decision is the final arbiter of the…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This case regarding Hinton involves the sixth amendment, various examples of how one can file a motion to suppress a charge/extend the trial, and goes off of the same basis and similarity of “Strickland v Washington”. This Supreme Court case all began in 1985 when a serious of restaurant robberies turned deadly in relatively the same way. Authorities had no leads until one of the restaurant managers survived an attack and picked out Mr. Hinton from a group of pictures presented before him. The police had thus arrested Hinton while recovering a revolver belonging to his mother, which is supposedly the murder weapon, and had charged him with two counts of capital murder. The only defense that worked for Hinton in his criminal trial is the ineffective…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Fifteenth Amendment guarantees that the "right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. "(Library of Congress). This means, in theory, that any US citizen should be able to vote no matter what their background. But the limits of this amendment are very apparent. This amendment does not guarantee rights of black women, they were not able to vote until 1920, earned with the rise of the woman’s suffrage movement.…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    14th Amendment Advantages

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As analyzed in Dynamic Constitution, the reality of the Supreme Court is that it simply finds the law and applies it, without the justices allowing their own views to come into play (Fallon). “The 1st amendment’s equal protection…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supremes Intro Imagine you’re at the Copa nightclub in 1965. The Supremes had just performed their opening song and your truly blown away. You ask Diana Ross for her autograph, and she remarks “This is the first autograph I’ve ever signed.” You then realized that this group of girls was going to inspire thousands of people.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chief Justice Marshall used both Original Meaning, Original Intent, and Structural Analysis in the interpretation of the Constitution as it applied to Marbury v. Madison. Marbury raised concerns in his case against Madison in which Chief Justice Marshall decided: 1st The right to the commission of Justice 2nd If he had the right was the right violated and do the laws give him a form of redress…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Terms: Patronage – the ability to give an office or position to another; many Jeffersonian wanted positions to be transferred to them from the previous president’s cabinet, which Jefferson refused to do, despite differences in political party judicial review – established by Marshall in Marbury v. Madison, it is the belief that the Supreme Court has the right to judge the constitutionality of a situation, not any other branch. Impressment – the forceful enlistment of a person for service as a sailor; the British captured and impressed many American sailors to serve the king, where many died, leaving their families behind unwillingly economic coercion – to convince a nation to do something as a result to changing financial conditions; America…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Duel Court System

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As the highest court in the United States, the Supreme Court has the lawful authority provided Article III of the U.S. Constitution created the Supreme Court and “authorized Congress to pass laws establishing a system of lower courts. In the federal court system’s present form, 94 district level trial courts and 13 courts of appeals sit below the Supreme Court.” This means that regardless of status of status, the Supreme Court has the final decision. The Plethora of Court…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court, as Justice Madison puts it, is the Supreme interpreter of the law, and all laws that are not constitutional must be strike down. Brandeis also thinks this way. He thinks the interpreter of the law has supervisory powers. They must be impartial and not allow a citizen or government official to break the law. If citizens break the law, then the appropriate punishment applies according to the statutes; however, if the government breaks the law, then sanctions applies to uphold the integrity of the law.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Everything can change at any moment, suddenly and forever” (“Paul”). American author Paul Auster expressed the famous idea of one moment shaping everything else in the future. On February 24, 1803, one mere Supreme Court case, Marbury v. Madison, changed the course of American history. From this ruling, the Supreme Court gained judicial review: the authority to give their opinions on the constitutionality of laws. This positively impacted America because it prohibited the government from abusing the Constitution.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    he Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court within the hierarchy of the country’s federal courts. The Court was established in accordance to Article III of the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court consists of nine total members, all of whom are nominated by the President at the time, and approved by the Senate. All nine members of the Supreme Court serve their term for life, only leaving when they retire, resign, or are impeached.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The judicial branch specializes in hearing cases and interprets the law, and if a citizen is not satisfied with the outcome you can…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays