Case: Petitioner V. Florida

Decent Essays
FACTS: Petitioner was charged in Florida with breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor; this offense is a felony in Florida. The petitioner asked the trial court to appoint counsel, but the court denied the request. The petitioner was found guilty and sentenced to 5 years in prison. The petitioner then filed in the Florida Supreme Court for habeas corpus arguing that the refusal of the trial court to appoint counsel denied him of constitutional rights, but was denied the relief. The case before the U.S. Supreme Court is a Writ of Certiorari.
ISSUE: Whether indigent defendants have a constitutional right to representation. Does the right to counsel in federal court, under the 6th Amendment, extend to the states under the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Appellant V Luis Ortiz

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    requirements of Miranda or whether the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his rights”. (wicourts.gov) STATE of Iowa, Appellant, v. Luis Fernando ORTIZ, Appellee, This case was filed in the Supreme Court of Iowa and was decided in 2009. On July 15, 2006, a woman called the Sioux City Police Department to report that Luis Ortiz, who she hired to do remodeling work in her house, “had forced her seven-year-old daughter to touch his penis”. After a brief meeting with Ortiz Detective Bertrand asked ortiz is he was willing to go to the police station with him for an interview. Once both arrived to the police station Detective Bertrand and Salvador Sanchez, a Sioux City officer, acting as translator, handed Ortiz a Voluntary Waiver of Rights…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Mempa v. Rhay, Jerry Douglas Mempa had pleaded guilty to joyriding, which then resulted in Mempa being on probation for a number of two years. Mempa’s case was then deferred but approximately four months later, he was then charged with burglary. Mempa’s probation was revoked, due to the burglary charge, and during the revocation process, Mempa had no counsel to represent him, was not offered the option of having counsel to represent him, nor asked of his previous court-appointed counsel. He plead guilty to the burglary charges and was sentenced to 10 years maximum, in compliance to Washington State Law ("Mempa v. Rhay 389 U.S. 128 (1967)", 2017). Within six years, Mempa sought a writ of Habeas Corpus because he was denied counsel during…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case, Brady v. Maryland 373 U.S. 83, Certiorari was granted to a decision of the Court of Appeals of Maryland to consider whether petitioner was denied a federal right when the appeals court restricted its grant of a new murder trial to the question of punishment, leaving the determination of guilt undisturbed. The appeals court granted a retrial after holding that suppression of evidence by the state violated petitioner's rights under the Due Process Clause, U.S. Constitutional Amendment XIV (Law School Case Briefs, 2013). Furthermore, there was a judgement that had granted the petitioner a new murder trial that was solely based on the issue of his punishment. Since the petitioner was convicted of murder and then sentenced to death in his first trail with the Maryland Court, the petitioner was then informed that the Maryland Courts had withheld a statement that indicated that another individual had admitted that exact homicide. What the Supreme Court had concluded from this case was that, because of the suppression of the evidence was in favorable to an accused upon the request that violated the Due Process Clause required the court to a…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lord Gideon Case Summary

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He argued that the trial court in Florida decision violated his rights of being appointed an attorney because he could afford one himself. “He first filled out a handwritten habeas corpus petition directly…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Moore Vs Texas Case Study

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Moore V. Texas In 1980 a man named Bobby James Moore was convicted of capital murder. Moore shot and killed Mr. James McCarble who was a seventy-year-old stork clerk in Houston, Texas. Moore was convicted and sentenced to death. In 2001 a federal court granted habeas corpus relief, which lead to a new punishment hearing, but Mr. Moore was once again sentence to the death.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Later on, habeas corpus was petition in federal court because the evidence was illegally acquired.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Issues: 1. Does the court have jurisdiction over the Defendant? 2. Should Grant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The writ states that as a private citizen of the United States, Mary Surratt is entitled to a civilian trial; and the current military trial is unwarranted, making the verdict unlawful (Turner). The writ is sent to the president, who responds by suspending the right of habeas corpus for the…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    INTRODUCTION Appellate litigation has played a major role in the development and progress of the Unite States. One case in particular, Gideon v. Wainwright, stands out to me as it has been one of the many motivating factors in my decision to purse of law degree. Gideon v. Wainwright, a case involving an indigent man by the name Clarence Gideon, who was denied counsel. This case not only changed America when the supreme court ruled the government must provide free counsel to accused criminals who cannot afford counsel for themselves, but this case as also had a huge impact on my family life and in my decision making when it came to my career path. GIDEON V. WAINWRIGHT Clarence Gideon was charged with breaking an entry into a pool hall in Florida.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This case questioned the Sixth Amendment 's extension of the right to counsel in state criminal felony cases. In a 9-0 decision, the Supreme Court upheld the right to counsel and argued that it extended to all cases. Supreme Court Justice Tom C. Clark argued that the Constitution guarantees the right to counsel in order to protect due process. The Gideon v Wainwright case was as milestone decision in which the Constitution was interpreted very…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So the final answer was the most important, the final answer was, “Yes he is entitled to the remedy, but why does he need it, and does the court really have the power to give him the writ. This question proposed conflict between Article 3 of the constitution and the Jud. Act of…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Powell V. Alabama Case

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Alabama of 1932 was a landmark case in American history. The case brought to the forefront the issue of legal counsel being guaranteed by the 6th Amendment, and how that right applied to the States by the 14th Amendment. This case brought up the issues and concerns of what the requirements of the State was in this type of criminal proceedings. Due Process wasn’t given to the African American men in this case. The Incorporation Doctrine within the Fourteenth Amendment will now serve as a series of checks and balances so that state governments can’t make sure not to violate these rights that are given to our…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    History Of Dual Federalism

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. Chart the changes in federalism throughout American history. What was dual federalism? How was governmental power distributed under this system? How did the Great Depression lead to the decline in dual federalism?…

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The case posed questions regarding the conduct of an inmate who participated in assisting fellow prisoners in planning the appeals for a writ of habeas corpus and any other legal papers. The amendment in scrutiny was the 28 U.S.C ~ 2242 that violates such prisoner actions. C. 384 US 436 (1966) Miranda v. Arizona Argued 2/28/66; 3/1/66; 3/2/66 Decided Jun 13, 1966 On March 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested for the allegations of rape and kidnapping.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Savitri Bhama

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Plaintiff, Savitri, filed a complaint that Rajendra negligently and intentionally inflicted emotional distress. She alleged that he used his psychiatric training in order to manipulate and brainwash the children into hating her. The defendant then made a motion for summary disposition, which the court granted. The court found the claim to be barred by res judicata. The plaintiff then claimed that by the court granting a summary of disposition was wrong, because her claim was based on relief and was not adjudicated by a court.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays