The manager’s role at the factory is to exercise administrative, executive, and supervisory objectives the organization. A leader is more than a manager and becoming a leader is a process beyond managerial appointment. The factory managers should be trained to take on more of a leadership role within the organization because “when they want to lead, they have to give up formal authoritarian control, because to lead is to have followers, and following is always a voluntary act” (Changing Minds, 2002-2011, para. 6). At best, the managers follow a traditional model of receiving compensation in return for working and telling subordinates what to do. Leadership and management do have similarities but Ricketts (2009) states that “there are also some striking differences (i.e. management is often more task-oriented; leadership is often considered more inspirational and visionary)” (para. 2). “The biggest difference between managers and leaders is the way they motivate people who work or follow them, and this sets the tone for most other aspects of what they do” (Changing Minds, 2002-2011, para. 1). Traditionally, the scenario at the factory is that the managers have a reporting structure consisting of subordinates taking work orders. An assessment of their situation shows that leadership is needed to turn things around. Leaders accomplish more than just manage people. They inspire them to reach organizational goals and to buy into the vision of the company through a charismatic and transformational work style. Employees do what they are told not just because they are managed and receive compensation as a reward but also because they want the organization to succeed because leadership compels them to do so. Because leadership is different from management, the factory could employ some relevant leadership styles to improve networking with the floor workers. Management should become more people focused, not using scare tactics and spying techniques to manage. A clear line of transparent communication is paramount to fostering a better relationship between the factory employees and management. Currently, the managers are very abrasive and condescending to the people working on the floor. Intolerance breeds intolerance and certain leadership competencies like sincerity, being visionary, empathic listening skills, inspiring, willingness to share responsibility, and trust would alleviate this tension. Conclusion The management team of Woody’s Veneer Factory was given a full scale assessment of the internal problems including employee and manager relations. Not only should the staff employ a new
The manager’s role at the factory is to exercise administrative, executive, and supervisory objectives the organization. A leader is more than a manager and becoming a leader is a process beyond managerial appointment. The factory managers should be trained to take on more of a leadership role within the organization because “when they want to lead, they have to give up formal authoritarian control, because to lead is to have followers, and following is always a voluntary act” (Changing Minds, 2002-2011, para. 6). At best, the managers follow a traditional model of receiving compensation in return for working and telling subordinates what to do. Leadership and management do have similarities but Ricketts (2009) states that “there are also some striking differences (i.e. management is often more task-oriented; leadership is often considered more inspirational and visionary)” (para. 2). “The biggest difference between managers and leaders is the way they motivate people who work or follow them, and this sets the tone for most other aspects of what they do” (Changing Minds, 2002-2011, para. 1). Traditionally, the scenario at the factory is that the managers have a reporting structure consisting of subordinates taking work orders. An assessment of their situation shows that leadership is needed to turn things around. Leaders accomplish more than just manage people. They inspire them to reach organizational goals and to buy into the vision of the company through a charismatic and transformational work style. Employees do what they are told not just because they are managed and receive compensation as a reward but also because they want the organization to succeed because leadership compels them to do so. Because leadership is different from management, the factory could employ some relevant leadership styles to improve networking with the floor workers. Management should become more people focused, not using scare tactics and spying techniques to manage. A clear line of transparent communication is paramount to fostering a better relationship between the factory employees and management. Currently, the managers are very abrasive and condescending to the people working on the floor. Intolerance breeds intolerance and certain leadership competencies like sincerity, being visionary, empathic listening skills, inspiring, willingness to share responsibility, and trust would alleviate this tension. Conclusion The management team of Woody’s Veneer Factory was given a full scale assessment of the internal problems including employee and manager relations. Not only should the staff employ a new