Why Is Animal Testing Bad

Improved Essays
Animals have always been there and helped us humans with many various things such as food, protection, being a friend, and many other things. Animals are everywhere we look, just looking put the window you are bound to see a bird or a fly or some other little animal or creature running around. Some animals make people go crazy such as dogs or cats and other animals make people scream and run the other direction like rats or snakes. Since at least 500 BC humans have tested products and performed various experiments on animals (ProCon.org). Animals such as rats, monkeys, cats and dogs are used for tests and experiments for the humans benefit without having a say in the matter. I believe that experimenting on animals is a wrong thing to do, especially …show more content…
This shows that not using animals can be just as effective as using animals most of the time. This quote can also go to show that most scientists are open to new ideas and ways of testing the products so things can still change here in the near future. The 92% statistic comes from an earlier report which showed only 8% of those drugs passing animal testing stages would go on successfully to be FDA approved (Understanding Animal Research) Is even just one life worth an 8% chance that a drug will pass and be approved by the FDA? With these other methods of testing the same products the passing rate may be higher or about the same. Either way taking the route of not using animals is best for now and for the long run. It will save the government money, save animals and human lives, and it will allow for us to move forward and discover new ways to help fight off diseases and look our best. Another alternative to testing on animals is using human skin leftovers from surgical procedures or donated cadavers can be used as test subjects (Alternatives: Testing Without Torture). This would be a very useful way of testing, because there are so many procedures each day the skin could be donated and used to research the safety of products.
Even though there are pros and cons to each way of testing products if it does or does not include animals. I believe that it is best not to use animals in research labs to test vaccinations and other various products because it is inhumane and better overall. It will save the government money, save animals and human lives, and it will allow for us to move forward and discover new ways to help fight off diseases and look our

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Are you surprised by anything that is said on the website? Why do you think many people are so quick to believe reported statistics? While on the website and reading the article, few things stood out to me. Like many, I was aware of the animal testing epidemic as well as the arguments made by critics and anti-animal testing groups who are opposed to it.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals all around the world are used for testing and research. People always wonder why people use animals. They ask why would scientist put these innocent creatures through something horrible. It has been proven that scientist use about 100 million animals for testing and research each year. From personal research, I have seen many inhumane things happen to these creatures that should not happen.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration admits that more than half of their experiments involving animals result in the trash because the difficulty of handling with animals are producing false information. Animal testing is unpredictable because the condition of each individual animal and species will vary. Clearly, experimenting with animals is unreasonable, dangerous, and…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the big controversy of animal testing is that it is believed to be cruel and inhumane. It is widely known that there have been experiments with animal subjects where animals have been harmed and mistreated to the point of death, and highlighted the need for some sort of protection of animals, which came in the form of the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA), but 95% of the animals that are being tested are not protected under the AWA, such as, birds, mice ,and rats who are bred for research, according to http://animal-testing.procon.org/. Another big point of controversy is that there have been cases where they do not show a side-effect that could be seen in a human consumer or they do not actually work on humans, when it is thought to have found a cure. For example, the drugs thalidomide and Vioxx, with the latter causing 27,000 cases of heart attacks and cardiac arrests. Lastly, the cost of using animals in research is higher than using other alternatives, such as the Animal Humane Societies in vitro, which costs around $11,000 to conduct compared to the $32,000 is would cost to do an animal study. Overall the use of animals for research is harmful to the animals who don 't have aren 't protected as best as they can be and is more expensive than using alternative methods to conduct…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is an awful and disgusting thing to do to another living creature with similar feelings to a person, and should not be allowed in our modern world today. The purpose of animal testing is to test the safety and hypoallergenic reactions of cosmetic products and medical drugs on animals to make sure people will not get hurt from these potentially…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Most animal tests fail/have problems. “The majority of animals used in biomedical research are killed during or after the experiments,” and “many suffer during the studies.” Animals aren’t required for testing There are alternative testing methods that can be used instead of animal testing. Vitro testing, glass testing, has more relevant results because we can use human cells which will be more effective than testing on…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peta Animal Testing

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animals do not deserve to be put through terrible experiments just for the good of…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Despite being around for so long, it’s not worth it and doesn’t really help us. The experimentation of animals should…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If asked whether they have or would ever abuse an animal, most people would wholeheartedly exclaim “no!” However, many people today buy cosmetics from brands that test on animals, and are unaware of how this simple action abuses and kills innocent creatures. Cosmetic companies should be banned from testing their products on animals because it is inhumane and an unreliable method of testing cosmetics. With moisturizing face masks and luscious lip glosses on the rise, it may be tempting to buy from well-known cosmetic companies, but most of these brands hide cruel and inhumane secrets about how they test their products. For instance, the U.S. Animal Welfare Act, which regulates animal testing, allows cosmetic companies to electrocute, burn,…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a result, chemists are left relying on a process that veers uncomfortably close to guesswork (Erickson)". This quote shows that scientists sometimes can not get a result from animal testing and that they just guess. They are guessing what the product will do to the animals then the people will take the product and since the scientists guess, there could be a horrible problem. In addition animals and humans have different…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    "Echo, a pet dog, is stolen from his backyard in Arkansas and sold by a Class B dealer to a research laboratory in Minnesota. " How would you feel if this was your pet? Facts on how many dogs are tested on a year: Seventeen million to 100 million are killed every year. Animal testing is wrong.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Animal Testing Bad

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Have you ever thought animal testing is bad to animals? Animal testing can hurt the animals really badly. Scientists, do this to make sure that the cosmetics will not hurt humans. This means that animals are being tested for cosmetics, it might have a bad effect, and could get the animals sick or kill them. Animals testing should keep on going on even though scientist don't listen because it is a law to not test on animals.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Beneficial

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are many people who support this form of scientific research because they believe it is better to test on animals rather than humans themselves because it is “impractical…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Each year, more than 100 million animals—including mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds—are killed in U.S. laboratories,” (“Experiments”). Animal experimentation is extremely wrong and be put to an end. Countless innocent animals get put through numerous tests as if they do not have feelings or emotions. Animal testing has been going on far too long, and is not helping in the way it should. Most animal experimentation is still continuing for the reason of tradition.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is animal experimentation justified? Some say yes, while the other side says no. Those that oppose animal experimentation argue that animals have their own unalienable rights and should not be tortured for our benefit. However, diseases such as smallpox, Polio, tuberculosis, and meningitis are not nearly as common as they were in previous times. Diseases that were thought to be incurable such as cancer and AIDS are slowly becoming vulnerable to new medicine that is being tested.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays