Two years after, the Chowell et al. research publication, Lekone and Finkenstadt at the University of Warwick have modified the model of Chowell et al. for discrete-time and stochastic progression at Ebola as a case study. Lekone and Finkenstadt concluded that their model can be used by epidemiologists to study the disease and the effectiveness of control interventions. In this critical analysis paper, I will provide the summary of this research paper and identify strengths and weaknesses, and provide evaluative comments. I will summarize the literature titled “Statistical Inference in a Stochastic Epidemic SEIR Model with Control Intervention: Ebola as a Case Study” and published by Lekone and Finkenstadt on Biometrics journal in 2006. I will identify its strengths and weaknesses and provide evaluative comments. Using the discrete-time SEIR model, the paper by Lekone and Finkenstadt strives to estimate the reproduction number and transmission rates of Ebola between the health states in compartmental model for the 1995 epidemic of Ebola in Congo. After estimating transmission rates, this paper addresses how effectively control intervention was used during the outbreak. With control intervention, the outbreak lasted for approximately 200 days. It is recorded that the first case became ill on January 6th, the last case died on July 16th, with a total of 316 cases were identified resulting in a rate of an 81% fatality rate. To study transmission rates, the researchers established the parameters that are derived from the compartmental model. To explore the posterior distribution of the parameters, the authors of the paper apply the SEIR model for the Ebola epidemic and the maximum-likelihood (ML) estimator for the parameters as well as the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. First the researchers simulated the time of epidemic series with the ML estimated parameter values obtained from complete data, then they validated using MCMC with various distributions. Their parameter results are shown on Table 2 and are verified by the literature of Chowell et al. Notably, the researchers concluded that the epidemic could have been lasted more than five times longer and epidemic size could have covered two thirds of the whole population of Congo in absence of intervention. Lekone and Frankstadt have written an important and timely research paper on discrete-time SEIR model with control
Two years after, the Chowell et al. research publication, Lekone and Finkenstadt at the University of Warwick have modified the model of Chowell et al. for discrete-time and stochastic progression at Ebola as a case study. Lekone and Finkenstadt concluded that their model can be used by epidemiologists to study the disease and the effectiveness of control interventions. In this critical analysis paper, I will provide the summary of this research paper and identify strengths and weaknesses, and provide evaluative comments. I will summarize the literature titled “Statistical Inference in a Stochastic Epidemic SEIR Model with Control Intervention: Ebola as a Case Study” and published by Lekone and Finkenstadt on Biometrics journal in 2006. I will identify its strengths and weaknesses and provide evaluative comments. Using the discrete-time SEIR model, the paper by Lekone and Finkenstadt strives to estimate the reproduction number and transmission rates of Ebola between the health states in compartmental model for the 1995 epidemic of Ebola in Congo. After estimating transmission rates, this paper addresses how effectively control intervention was used during the outbreak. With control intervention, the outbreak lasted for approximately 200 days. It is recorded that the first case became ill on January 6th, the last case died on July 16th, with a total of 316 cases were identified resulting in a rate of an 81% fatality rate. To study transmission rates, the researchers established the parameters that are derived from the compartmental model. To explore the posterior distribution of the parameters, the authors of the paper apply the SEIR model for the Ebola epidemic and the maximum-likelihood (ML) estimator for the parameters as well as the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. First the researchers simulated the time of epidemic series with the ML estimated parameter values obtained from complete data, then they validated using MCMC with various distributions. Their parameter results are shown on Table 2 and are verified by the literature of Chowell et al. Notably, the researchers concluded that the epidemic could have been lasted more than five times longer and epidemic size could have covered two thirds of the whole population of Congo in absence of intervention. Lekone and Frankstadt have written an important and timely research paper on discrete-time SEIR model with control