The Importance Of Nuclear Energy

Improved Essays
World population is growing faster than ever, and as all civilizations, it is needed energy to power their development. Nowadays, we count with powerful sources of energy, fossil-based fuels, which have been highly effective but pollutant since they were discovered. Moreover, alternative energy sources such wind and solar have appeared to complement fossil- based fuels in order to cover our demanding economies’ energy needs and lessen their impact in the environment. However, there is still an even more potent kind of energy that should be thought of by governments and the public as the energy of the future -nuclear energy- because it is safe, cost-effective and efficient, and the only viable solution to fight global warming. Many are …show more content…
In fact, according to the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), only 1 out of the 437 operating nuclear reactors worldwide has been damaged over the course of the past 25 years, and this damage would not have happened if the plant had used up-to-date technology in place of using ceramic conducts which provoked the overheating and posterior explosion at Fukushima’s reactors in 2011. Moreover, it would be almost impossible that happen an accident like Chernobyl because subsequent technological innovations and improvements have made nuclear plants safer, and also safety standards at Chernobyl plant were extremely careless even for that time. According to P.E. Hodgson, a senior researcher at Oxford University, the negative public perception of safety at nuclear plants is more influence by occasional and spectacular incidents than scientific facts and statistics. Furthermore, there are two safety concerns in the framework of nuclear power: meltdown and terrorism, but both have been disregarded by next-generation fission technologies. Nuclear reactors are today especially protected by a complex system of layers that prevents external and internal explosions from allowing radioactive material to escape into atmosphere. Also, most of the reactors already in operation are molten-salt reactors that run at atmospheric pressure which eliminates the threat of …show more content…
First, fission reaction produces heat easily because of the enormous amount of released energy result of nuclear process. As soon as the nuclear reaction happens, the water in the reactor begins to boil and generate vapor which moves the turbines to produce cheap electricity. In addition, most reactors developed in this century are molten-salt reactors which are significantly efficient since they have a reduced size that allows an easy elimination of waste materials. Also, such reactors lend themselves to factory manufacture, reducing their cost. Furthermore, taking advantage of the endless fission process, nuclear plants are the most reliable source of electricity, operating full time for 18 to 24 months before shutting down for a short time in order to refuel. Now, compared to another alternative sources of energy, nuclear energy is more efficient. For example, in order to increase the contribution of energy coming from renewable energies, large areas of land are necessary to obtain even modest quantities of power. Even with vast tracts of land filled with solar panels and/or wind turbines, the electricity produced is intermittent and must be stored and transported, which is more than expensive. Moreover, according to Bill Gates, if we store all batteries that exist in the world, they could only provide 10 minutes of energy for the world. In addition, leader

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    1. “Why the World May Turn to Nuclear Power” is a passage that lays out all of the main components of Nuclear energy. It is filled with statistics and real world examples, including visual aids. The major purpose of this text is to inform the reader that nuclear power is in fact a beneficial form of energy. Three images on page 18 show nuclear power in action.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    total of 283 million tons of coal were mined, providing about 64% of the state’s electrical production (Reese and Loughlin, 61). ” Mining has caused severe environmental impacts ranging from the toxic chemicals seeping into the watershed, the altering of landscapes, and large amounts of waste (Reese and Loughlin, 61). New laws have been developed in order to reverse the negative trends from mining, which include the following: Abandoned Mine Land law, Open Cut Land Reclamation Act, Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (Reese and Loughlin, 62)…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Annotated Bibliography Topic: Nuclear Energy Thesis: While nuclear energy has many benefits, the negative implications must be considered. " Fukushima's Radioactive Water Leak: What You Should Know. "…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the atomic bomb was dropped nuclear physicists began looking into other uses for nuclear power. A decade later scientist were able to productively generate nuclear power into an alternative source for electricity. Nuclear reactor generate 17 percent of the electricity around the world reaching a remarkable high compared to previous years (Martin). Plants can generate more than a gigawatt of electricity which is about one million megawatts of energy. That’s why using nuclear power for electricity is beneficial.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With a nuclear reactor you get a lot of power without using a lot of…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Despite these feats, they have disadvantages that counteract them. For one, while nuclear power plants are cheap to run, the construction of said plants are very expensive. According to various of sources such as Ucsusa and Synapse Energy Economics, over the years, the estimation of nuclear plant construction’s cost rose from between $2 billion and $4 billion to $9 billion (aka 2,000,000,000 - 4,000,000,000 dollars to 9,000,000,000 dollars). Secondly, the source of…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Energy Proposal

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages

    All sources except for “Thorium”, Ian Schultz’s article and the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency conclude that nuclear energy is reliable. The sources that do not state this deal with other aspects concerning nuclear energy such as cost and fuel. Another trend is the low cost of nuclear energy after the initial build of the plant, which is concluded by every source, but “Murkowski: Nuclear Energy Crucial to Future of U.S. Energy Policy”, “Unmatched Reliability” and “CO2 emission of electricity from nuclear power stations”. Finally, all sources but “Thorium”, the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency, Ian Schultz’s report, “Unmatched Reliability” and “Murkowski: Nuclear Energy Crucial to Future of U.S. Energy Policy”, discuss the low pollution of nuclear energy which is the last key point of my essay. • All of the sources are credible sources, because they are relevant, produced recently and are either organizations, education sites or databases.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Beginning in the 1960’s nuclear power was believed to be an attractive alternative to fossil fuels and was even referred to as the energy source of the future. To the uninformed the use of nuclear energy may seem frightening because the only thing rumored is the negatives like: the waste, major spills of material and disastrous radioactive accidents, but there are many benefits from the use of this energy source such as: saving millions of lives, a mass reduction of pollution, and an advancement of technology. Although it may take a long time, society will benefit from this energy source. The reason why we should support the use of nuclear energy is because, “scientists have estimated that if all the accidents at nuclear reactors were averaged…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No matter how small the probability, safety concerns with nuclear power plants pose a real and finite danger. The purpose of a nuclear power plant is to produce electricity for supporting increases in consumption of other electrical uses like power and other things. In spite of its many benefits, nuclear power often falls under fire because of the many disadvantages it brings. After the uranium splits to generate heat, the resulting byproducts are radioactive, which means they need to be removed in a safe way. Even though power plants have undergone recycling efforts of this waste product in recent years, storing the byproduct can lead to contamination through various containment failures.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regardless of the various definitions of renewable energy, nuclear energy meets every reasonable criterion for sustainability, which is the primary concern of countries. The United States should use nuclear energy for three primary reasons: first, it produces more cost effective energy than any other non-renewable resource. Second there is no release of greenhouse gasses which contribute to global warming, and finally nuclear energy is the most reliable source of power in the world today. Nuclear power produces electricity that is less expensive than coal and natural gas while providing more energy for use. The Energy Informative Organization supports this claim when the author states, “Generating electricity in nuclear reactors is cheaper…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Uranium Pros And Cons

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages

    We know that nuclear bombs are the most deadly weapon on the face of the earth, but there is a positive way to use the uranium. We use uranium in our nuclear energy reactors to provide a clean energy for our power grids. “America’s 99 nuclear power plants generate almost 20 percent of the nation’s electricity while emitting no carbon dioxide or controlled pollutants’’ stated in the article “How Nuclear Reactors Work” in 2017. It is important to know how nuclear reactors work and how harmless the production of nuclear energy is. Nuclear energy is simple.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    CPT Proposal

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Pages

    For my CPT proposal, I have chosen the book Phantom of the Opera and the poem, “Voyagers I”, because of how they thematically related. The Phantom of the Opera was written by Gaston Leroux, and was published by the New American Library in 1987. The poem, “Voyagers I” was written by Harold Hart Crane, and was published by the Liveright Publishing Company in 1927. The theme that relates these two renowned works, is the priceless value of innocence in life. The reason I chose the value of innocence in life is, because of how the poem and book are written; the book has the reader shown the value of innocence through the characterization of characters, and the poem shows the reader the value of innocence through the dictation of the poem and…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In March 2011 tragic struck Japan when a few reactors had become unstable and exploded. This being a big problem is small in comparison to its advantages. This paper will explore how nuclear power effects the environment, how reliable it is, and how efficient it can be. First, Nuclear power does not harm the environment.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear power us one of the biggest and best power sources known today. Nuclear fusion and fission makes a lot of excess usable energy. It produces a lot more energy than wind, solar, coal, or fossil fuels do, and they actually are better for the environment than coal or fossil fuels, producing helium rather than carbon monoxide. In short, nuclear power is a good idea because we can take care of the nuclear waste, the reactors have better safety measures and protocols than normal factories, is more cost efficient, and it better for the environment than conventional power.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This contrasts to coal fired units which emit copious amounts of substances that aren’t immediately deadly, and didn’t require immediate attention when they were first created thus leading to the environmental state we’re currently in. even though it’s true that nuclear fallout can be a serious problem, many reactors have several containment precautions. Even the incident at Three Mile Island which scared a nation into halting production of nuclear energy was mostly contained, and there have been no identifiable negative health effects [9]. Even considering the amount of current deaths because of both nuclear and fossil fuels, studies show that the amount of energy being produced by nuclear power instead of fossil fuels has actually saved tens of thousands of lives. The study estimated that for each terawatt hour of electricity produced, an average of 26.67 lives are lost whereas a terawatt hour of nuclear electricity kills an average of 0.074 people (stats relevant for Europe)…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays