The …show more content…
This study “empirically tested students before and after intervention of lessons were differentiated either by learning style or by ability” (Allcock & Hulme, 2010). Both classes were taught by the same instructor, for the same amount of time, received the same exams, and were given the same inventories and initial questionnaires. The only thing that differed was the type of intervention received, that is intervention by learning styles or by ability. Over the course of nine weeks, the students were taught topics “according to the scheme of work through lessons differentiated by learning style or ability” and given test to assess there knowledge and growth (Allcock & Hulme, 2010). At the end of the study, the results collected show a significant rise in test scores; however, there were no significant differences between the improvements of scores based on the method of differentiation. Although not significant, there was small trend for students who received differentiated instruction by ability to improve more. The authors suggests that as long as teachers provide quality, varied lessons, students can achieve their fullest academic potential without one method of teaching being superior to the …show more content…
He believes they are products on one’s environment, and they can be developed over time. Sternberg also feels that learning styles can differ during the various stages of life. The author suggests that Sternberg’s view is one of many different views on learning styles. Whether learning styles are biologically or environmentally determined is still being studied. Kaminska states that some research shows that learning styles are the “outcomes of genetic make up”, while others believe they are influenced by life’s experiences