The First Minister (FM) In The Scottish Parliament

Improved Essays
he First Minister (FM) in Scotland is the head of the Scottish cabinet and has responsibility for the formulation, development and presentation of Scottish government policy. These roles- and numerous additional ones- indicate that the FM does, in fact, play an important roles within the Scottish Parliament. This essays main focus will be to evaluate the FM's importance; specifically, his importance in regards to decision making within the parliament and consequently within Scotland itself.

The First Minister represents Scotland in all devolved areas. This means that the elected First Minister is expected to have a clear vision for running the country and to make decisions and frame policies for education, health and transport. It is also
…show more content…
This is ensured through FMQT. The FM's decisions can be question and even ridiculed by other parties in FM's Question Time. First Minister's Questions Time is held every Thursday at noon or by submitting a written question. First Minister's Question Time is mostly dominated by the leaders of Labour, Conservatives and the Liberal Democrat parties and therefore very few backbench MSP's get the opportunity to ask the First Minister a question. However now that Nicola Sturgeon has increased the length of FMQT to 45mins this gives individual MSP's the opportunity to ask a question to the the First Minister. During 2014-2015 only 318 questions were asked at First Minister's Question compared to 3,654 written questions to the First Minister during the same period. An example of a question being asked would be in November 2014, Jackie Bailey of the Labour party stated that "the number of college students has been cut by 140,000 since 2007" further adding emphasis on her criticism by adding "the number of teachers in Scotland has dropped by 4,000". She highlighted the SNP's failure in relation to improving education standards numerous times, thus bringing the government to account for its actions publicly, making the media portray the SNP and its leader in a negative light. This shows that despite the fact that the FM can make important decisions in regards to Scotland, in the case that those decisions are …show more content…
For example Alex Salmond visited China on more than one occasion during his time as FM in order to improve trade-links with the country and with an eye in attracting foreign investments and jobs to Scotland. Nicola sturgeon also visited China in 2015 for a trade mission to improve links between countries. It is estimated that Chinese have contributed £112m to the Scottish economy in 2012 and 2014. She has also attended sporting events to represent Scotland, including the Wimbledon final in 2016. This gives the FM tremendous influence as they are essentially figureheads for Scotland and can have a impact on Scottish economic policy by raising the profile of the nation abroad and by attracting investment. This clearly show that putting Scotland on map is a an important decision for the FM to as we reap what we

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Committees are messy. Few, if any, routinely reach mainstream media attention (see Section V). Less generate political traction. And when committees become important, they not so infrequently become televised, more politicized, and then largely ignored by stakeholders. Consequently, when deciding on a normative lens, the study of House of Commons committees should rely on Deborah Stone’s polis model specifically because of its focus on realpolitik instead of the idealism rejected in the introduction.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Those who are assigned as leaders, are to be sent to the Home of Leaders, where they can study and become candidates so they can be elected to the city…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Halifax Blues

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Prior to the actual lesson which deals with the poem {\tql}Halifax blues{\tqr} by George Elliot Clarke and the eponymous city, the class is to be introduced firstly to Canada as a country. The teaching unit thereby chooses a top-down approach to the topic by looking at the overall aspects as for instance {\tql}Government{\tqr}, {\tql}Provinces and Territories{\tqr} and {\tql}People{\tqr} and then closing in on the capital city of the Province Nova Scotia, Halifax, and the poem that draws a gloomy picture of a night around the harbor of this city. During this lesson of getting introduced to Canada, the students are supposed to learn the following about Canada: Canada is the second largest country in the world and occupies, apart from Greenland, Alaska and the French islands of St-Pierre and Miquelon, the northern region of the North American Continent. Canada is divided into ten provinces and three territories, whereby the capital is Ottawa.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mayhew wants to build a civil society and not have to work for the society since the government is supposed to help the citizens. In addition, his idea is to secure the welfare of everyone in the…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1.0 Introduction As a nation, Australians have become a unique group of individuals, vastly different from the British who settled in this country. Australia is a multicultural continent with its own laws, constitution and systems, so why should Australians still be a part of the constitutional monarchy under Britain? Why should it not become a republic, and increase its independence? This report will investigate the currant system Australia operates under, and the suggestions that have been made in the past to change to a republic, to come to a conclusion on whether or not Australia should become a republic, or remain a constitutional monarchy.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    This essay will discuss why the Australian Constitution has separated the legislative, executive and judicial powers. The separation of powers is about preserving our freedom as enshrined in the Australian Constitution. The history of the separation of powers theory will be discussed, also there will be references to weekly reading materials and weekly tasks. Argued will be that the reasoning behind the separation of power is to ensure that no branch of government or an individual has sole power of the government and the country with the checks and balances system being vital to ensure the former statement. Governmental Powers Described In order to understand why we separate the legislative, executive and judicial powers in the Australian…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What is the issue, how did you find out about it, and what sources did you use to research it? Earlier this year at the ALP National Conference, Labor leader Bill Shorten stated, “Let us make this the first decade where our head of state is one of us. We can be an Australian republic, with an Australian head of state.” (Ireland, 2015).…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Role of Prime Minster of Canada and the President of the United States Many people think that President of the United States has more power than Prime Minster of Canada. However, when we look at the constitution of both countries, we can see that Prime Minister of Canada has more power in his or her country than President of United States does. When we want to compare and differentiate the power of both Prime Minster of Canada and President of United States, we need to look at their system of Government, roles of both Prime Minster of Canada and President of United States on legislative power, party discipline, appointive power, influence, and military power, and ability to implement their agenda. If we want to know more about the powers and role of Prime Minster of Canada and President of United States, we have to first look at their system of Government.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The leaders of the United States gathered in 1787 to write the Constitution of the United States, which was to be a set of principles that told how the new nation would be governed. The leaders wanted a strong, but fair government that would protect the individual freedoms and prevent the government from abusing its power. The leaders did this by creating 3 separate branches of government: the legislative, the executive and the judicial. The Senate has 100 members, 2 from each state.…

    • 1860 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bibliography • Andersen, S. S., & Eliassen, K. A. (Eds.). (1996). The European Union: how democratic is it? London: SAGE.…

    • 2829 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lisbon Treaty

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The European Union has always been recognized as suffering from democratic deficit and the standard of the European Union has been a controversial issue since the early 1990s. Therefore, Lisbon Treaty was lately implemented in order to improve the Union’s democracy. However, it is arguable that whether the Lisbon Treaty is effective enough to tackle the problem of democracy, which will be discussed in the following. In this essay, I will first define what is ‘democratic deficit’ and show the historical development of Lisbon Treaty, hence talking about the significant changes and problems of it.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The United States and the United Kingdom’s system of choosing the leader of vary greatly in how the processes are done. But if one were to investigate and research further into the systems, one would find the fundamental processes are similar in which they operate with only a few key differences between the two electoral processes. One of the major differences between the United Kingdom and the United States is that in the UK citizens do not directly elect the leader of the country, they simply vote for members of parliament, and the party with the most seats in parliament usually has its leader selected by the Queen as its prime minister. (UK Parliament 2015) The difference between that process and the one present in the United States is that…

    • 2495 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The introduction of the Scottish Parliament gave an in important new platform to the public and private sector, special constable, territorial army. The paper is here: Cairney Governance Complexity Accountability Scotland 20.11.14 Policy Concepts in 1000 Words: the Westminster Model and Multi-level Governance. >>>CLICK HERE<<< The scholarship is based upon a simple one-page application and a 700-1,000 word essay on…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Compared to the Presidential system, the Parliamentary system is more favourable to a healthy democracy. This essay will discuss the relationship between the Parliamentary and Presidential systems’ executive and legislative powers and the ways they differ from one another. Within the Parliamentary system, the executive and legislative powers are fused together to set and control the government (Mintz et al. 331-332).…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a major advantage to the Prime Minister as it essentially allows for them to appoint those who will be loyal and support their decisions throughout their time in office. Therefore it is argued that the “British government embodies a system not of formally codified rules but instead advice”2 and relates to the Prime Minister being surrounded by 'Yes ' men who simply agree and advise rather than argue and debate. As a result, this allows the Prime Minister to push their political agenda forward with little opposition as those in the cabinet are usually in favour or loyal to their decision. To embody this sense of power further, the Prime Minister can drop cabinet members who are not in favour of their decision from the cabinet entirely3 increasing their political standing by replacing them with someone more in favour. Theoretically, cabinet members can debate against points made by the Prime Minister, however this is very unlikely due to having a sense of loyalty after being appointed by them.…

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays