• Home Page
  • Parliamentary System Vs. Presidential System

Parliamentary System Vs. Presidential System

Superior Essays
Show More
Compared to the Presidential system, the Parliamentary system is more favourable to a healthy democracy. This essay will discuss the relationship between the Parliamentary and Presidential systems’ executive and legislative powers and the ways they differ from one another.
Within the Parliamentary system, the executive and legislative powers are fused together to set and control the government (Mintz et al. 331-332). Both the Prime Minister (PM), who is the elected leader and their appointed Cabinet make up the executive power (Canadian Ministry) within the Parliamentary system (329). Cooperation between the executive and legislative branches (House of Commons and Senate) is necessary for the government to function properly and efficiently. The PM delegates which department each Cabinet member (Minister) will be in charge of, such as transport, foreign affairs, international trade, etc. These Ministers work with the PM to develop laws and policies based on issues in their respective departments (339).
Canadian Parliament consists of the Monarch (represented by the Governor General), House of Commons (of which the Canadian Ministry are all members) and Senate. These groups are responsible for the conception, creation, debate, amendment, and approval of all federal legislation (Mintz et al. 343). Within …show more content…
The first major advantage of Parliamentary government is that there is no election to select the PM directly. Parliamentary elections function using a straightforward principle that the majority rules (Mintz et al. 332). People vote for the person that will represent their riding (consisting of 100,000 people) (Bourne, Class Notes). The political party whose candidates are the most successful become the leading party. The leader of the winning party then becomes the Prime Minister

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Charter Of Rights Analysis
    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Charter Of Rights Analysis

    1. Power is distributed between the federal and provincial government due to Canada being a federal state. Both levels of government shares the obligation and jurisdiction over particular sectors of law and divisions such as; health care, corrections and many more. The Queen of England is the head of the government and the Governor General acts as her representative in Canada and works alongside the Prime Minister, which leaves Canada as a constitutional monarchy.…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    William E Hudson Separation Of Power Analysis
    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    William E Hudson Separation Of Power Analysis

    William E. Hudson's "American Democracy in Peril" points out different flows in the America's government system. Chapter 2 "The First Challenge: Separation of Power" gives a insight on how the separation of power system is cause government to be unaccountable and unresponsive. It also talks about how a parliamentarian system is more efficient. First how does Separation of Powers prevent control, responsiveness, and accountability? Separation-of-power makes it so that no one branch has compete power and they all work independently as well as together.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    The Canadian Senate: Chamber Of Sober Reflection By David C. Docherty
    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Canadian Senate: Chamber Of Sober Reflection By David C. Docherty

    David C. Docherty’s (2002) scholarly journal: The Canadian Senate: Chamber of Sober Reflection or Loony Cousin Best Not Talked About, responds to the continual controversy and debate of the usefulness of the Canadian senate. Docherty’s (2002) article analyzes the current Canadian senate and argues that the senate is a failing Canadian institution because of two democratic deficiencies: the undemocratic nature of senator selection and the inability of senators to represent provinces properly. Docherty analyzes four Senate reforms and answers the question of why these reforms failed, in doing so Docherty lays down a framework for a possible successful senate reform but acknowledges the obstacles in doing so. The reader is provided with the knowledge…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Halifax Blues
    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Halifax Blues

    Prior to the actual lesson which deals with the poem {\tql}Halifax blues{\tqr} by George Elliot Clarke and the eponymous city, the class is to be introduced firstly to Canada as a country. The teaching unit thereby chooses a top-down approach to the topic by looking at the overall aspects as for instance {\tql}Government{\tqr}, {\tql}Provinces and Territories{\tqr} and {\tql}People{\tqr} and then closing in on the capital city of the Province Nova Scotia, Halifax, and the poem that draws a gloomy picture of a night around the harbor of this city. During this lesson of getting introduced to Canada, the students are supposed to learn the following about Canada: Canada is the second largest country in the world and occupies, apart from Greenland, Alaska and the French islands of St-Pierre and Miquelon, the northern region of the North American Continent. Canada is divided into ten provinces and three territories, whereby the capital is Ottawa.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Legislative Process: Similarities Between The Senate And The House Of Representatives
    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Legislative Process: Similarities Between The Senate And The House Of Representatives

    The U.S. Constitution awards all legislative powers to a bicameral Congress which includes the Senate and the House of Representatives. It was designed to avoid giving too much power to just one branch; a way to maintain balance based on the interest of the states. This new system was created as a way to repair the weak government during the Articles of Confederation. The House is based on population and the Senate is based on state representation. I will discuss how the legislative process differs in the Senate and the House of Representatives as well as state some similarities.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Is The Canadian Prime Minister Too Powerful?
    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Is The Canadian Prime Minister Too Powerful?

    In many countries such as Canada and the United States, the hegemony has been divided between the executive branch, the judiciary courts and the legislative branch. “Generally, the amount of power for each member of these institutions is to be uniformly divided; conversely, the fairly recent transformation has increasingly concentrated the majority of power towards the hearts of the government” ("Is the Canadian Prime Minister too Powerful?,"2010). In recent years, many political scientist have argued that the demographic changes in political systems have led the executive branches in western governments to have extensive amounts of power. In this essay, I will argue that the executive branches of western governments; particularly that of Canada’s…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Three Branches Of Federal Government
    • 209 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Three Branches Of Federal Government

    The three branches of our federal government consisting of the Executive branch, The Legislative branch, and the Judicial branch. Each of these branches plays a key role in homeostasis within our central government. Things like checks and balances ensure the stability of each of these vital branches of the American Federal Government. No one branch is more important than the other and they all have to work together to function properly. The Executive branch of the government is represented by the President and his choice of members.…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    The Role Of The Separation Of Powers In The Australian Constitution
    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Role Of The Separation Of Powers In The Australian Constitution

    Australia’s parliamentary system is categorised as a fusion as opposed to a separation of powers as the executive branch is answerable and part of the legislative branch. Each branch of government should work within their areas of responsibility so they act like checks and balances on each other with 100 years of stable government testifying to its effectiveness. A fourth way which holds the governmental branches accountable is the citizens of the country, they form a check and balance system. Citizens are able to judge a government come election time but Parliament holds governments responsible for their actions in-between elections (Fenna, 2014). Australia uses a liberal system of government which implies that there is a need to have limits of the power of governments as indicated by (Fenna, 2014).…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Essay On Prime Minister Of Canada
    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Essay On Prime Minister Of Canada

    The Role of Prime Minster of Canada and the President of the United States Many people think that President of the United States has more power than Prime Minster of Canada. However, when we look at the constitution of both countries, we can see that Prime Minister of Canada has more power in his or her country than President of United States does. When we want to compare and differentiate the power of both Prime Minster of Canada and President of United States, we need to look at their system of Government, roles of both Prime Minster of Canada and President of United States on legislative power, party discipline, appointive power, influence, and military power, and ability to implement their agenda. If we want to know more about the powers and role of Prime Minster of Canada and President of United States, we have to first look at their system of Government.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Canada Prime Minister
    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Canada Prime Minister

    Since the confederation of Canada in 1867 and the election of Sir John A. Macdonald as the first prime minister, the role of the nation’s leader has changed. While the prime minister is elected by the people to govern at the helm of Canada, “the excessive centralization of executive powers by the prime minister can damage good democratic government”. In our Westminster-style government, the power vested within the prime minister has become somewhat absolute, with too much control over the House of Commons. Over time, numerous factors have contributed to the decline of responsible government and the rise of the prime minister’s power. Such factors like the Canadian Constitution, the type of government, party solidarity and the liberty for the prime minister to choose members of both his Cabinet and the Senate have been crucial in the growth of power.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Canadian Electoral System
    • 1759 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Essay On Canadian Electoral System

    Negatives include the process that needs to be undertaken to reform something as important as the style of elections and the fear that other electoral systems will result in unstable minorities who do not have the power to make meaningful change in Canada. However, the positives of a switch in electoral systems outweigh the negatives and will benefit the majority of Canadians. For women, electoral reform could mean a significant increase in opportunities for political participation. Similar to women, minority groups such as recent citizens/immigrants as well as the Aboriginal population could have a larger voice in the way Canada is run and how laws are made. A new way to elect officials may also turn the tide of apathy and indifference among voters and encourage them to be more politically active and advocate for systems that make their government more representative of society as a…

    • 1759 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    William Hudson Challenges To American Democracy Analysis
    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages

    William Hudson Challenges To American Democracy Analysis

    Per Hudson, the solution to this problem is to have a political alternative. The parliamentary system is a combination of the executive and legislative branches with the prime minister as the leader of the majority party. With this option, Hudson lists a few items he considers to be relevant to a parliamentary system, such as a greater accountability of the candidates and the officials by their respective political parties, as compared to American politicians. An example Hudson cites occurred in 1990 when the Conservative Party asked Margaret Thatcher to resign because they feared her leadership would result in defeat for the party. While this, indeed, is a change usually not seen in America, some of the parliamentary system features will not fit our country.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Thinking About Political Reform Summary
    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Thinking About Political Reform Summary

    A Parliamentary system gives entirely too much power to the leader and America’s government separates the party, however, the president is the leader. Therefore, I disagree that a Parliamentary system will benefit the American…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Fptp In Canada
    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Fptp In Canada

    For almost 150 years, Canada has used the FPTP system to elect their governmental representatives. FPTP is a simple and common method widely used across the world in countries, such as the United States, United Kingdom and Canada. “The leader of the party that secures the largest number of seats in the House of Commons… becomes the prime minister and forms the government.” In FPTP, a single-member plurality electoral system, the winning candidate is the individual who garnered most votes, but…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Importance Of Power: The Power Of The Prime Minister
    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Importance Of Power: The Power Of The Prime Minister

    This is a major advantage to the Prime Minister as it essentially allows for them to appoint those who will be loyal and support their decisions throughout their time in office. Therefore it is argued that the “British government embodies a system not of formally codified rules but instead advice”2 and relates to the Prime Minister being surrounded by 'Yes ' men who simply agree and advise rather than argue and debate. As a result, this allows the Prime Minister to push their political agenda forward with little opposition as those in the cabinet are usually in favour or loyal to their decision. To embody this sense of power further, the Prime Minister can drop cabinet members who are not in favour of their decision from the cabinet entirely3 increasing their political standing by replacing them with someone more in favour. Theoretically, cabinet members can debate against points made by the Prime Minister, however this is very unlikely due to having a sense of loyalty after being appointed by them.…

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  Cookie Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings