The Concept Of Free Will

Superior Essays
Does free will exist?
As humans came to enlightenment, the concept of free will concerned many philosophers’ thoughts, especially in philosophy of religion. Many came to question, whether humans have free will or they just do what needs to be done based on God’s plan. Therefore, many philosophers assume that the meaning of free will is the ability to choose to do something with one’s desire or to be free to choose. Moreover, people have different minds and different views about the idea of free will; some believe that it exists, and some don’t. For instance, Arminianism and Calvinism, two different forms of Christianity, have different views about the idea of free will. Arminianism is based on free will and Calvinism is based on predestination. I will argue that the idea of free will in the Arminianism belief is right because God does not decide who would get salvation and who would not, but people do themselves. The article, “A Review Essay: Olson’s Arminian Theology” by Don Thorsen mentioned that Arminianism believes that Jesus died for all, and salvation is provided for everyone.
…show more content…
God knows who would be saved from the beginning; however, He is not the one who determined it. God gives humans free will and they are free to choose or reject the salvation. Moreover, Arminianism considers that to choose good over evil is peoples’ choice. Arminianists also believe that God is in charge of everything, but He does not control everything in order to give humans self-determination. Therefore, God does not use His power to control over people whom have denied Him. He only controls, guides, and saves those that accept Him. On the other hand, Thorsen also states that Calvinism believes that God decided who would be saved from before they were born. Calvinists also believe that humans do not have the ability to choose to do good over evil because they are sinners. Therefore, salvation is totally the gift from God. Moreover, in order to get saved, people need to have faith, and faith is from God. Calvinism considers that God is not limited in His work to make the elected people believe in Him. Additionally, Calvinism also believes that people who are elected could never lose their salvation because the faith they have is from God. A short story, “Please Don 't Tell Me How The Story Ends” by Thomas D. Davis addresses free will. The story is about a man who was locked up in a room without interactions with other people. Whatever this man does, all his actions and activities are recorded in the book that was in that room. He concentrates on this book and wonders if the book already knows what he is going to do. He becomes insane about it and once he even decides to kill himself. However, he realizes that if he did that the book would just record his actions. So, he changes his mind and decides to not be bothered with that book anymore. He knows that whatever he decides to do, the book would just record it. William Egginton’s article called, “The Limits of the Coded World” also talked about free will. Egginton writes about a machine that can read the mind of a monkey and know what the monkey is going to do. Egginton said if something or someone knew what he is going to do in the future, even when he did not think about it yet, it meant that everything was already decided for him. Even so, the author said that he is free according to what Darwin discovered because no one can force or tell him what he should do. However, the author also agreed with Strawson that humans were not free because they had to make a choice, even when they thought there was no choice for them to make. Christianity considers that humans are sinners and salvation is the gift from God. Humans do not have the ability to save themselves or overcome evils. Consequently, Jesus had to come and save them. However, the idea of Calvinist beliefs that God decided whom to be saved does not seem reasonable. If God were the one who decided,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rue 4 de Vaurobel, a six story townhome, where an innocent sixteen year old girl’s free will is robbed right from her. All the Light We Cannot See, by Anthony Doerr, juxtaposes two very complex and different stories; a blind adolescent girl who is trying to find her way in a new environment and an obedient teenage boy who turns soldier after learning how to configure radios. Marie-Laure and Werner’s story are from two utterly contrasting ends of the spectrum but connect during the same time period. The definition of free will is stated as the power of acting without the restraint of necessity or fate. Marie-Laure LeBlanc has limited free will which has been developed thus far in the novel, described through two major characteristics:…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, the free will problem, pertaining to philosophical nature, will be introduced and explained so that the reader can grasp the foundation of this essay’s main focus. The main focus of this essay is A.J. Ayer and his argument for compatibilism. The argument for compatibilism, according to Ayer, is that a choice that one makes cannot be free unless it is caused. Ayer also suggests that a person can only be held morally responsible for their actions if they had the ability to choose otherwise. This may sound confusing right now, but it will make sense soon.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reconciliation of moral responsibility and freewill allows us to understand how having freewill forces humans to believe that their behaviors and doings are morally responsible because their actions are caused naturally and or are determined. The question here is what is free will? Historically speaking, it is the action of acting freely; meaning everything is done causally due to the person. Free will and moral responsibility go hand in hand, but the issue is can a person really be in control of these things they had no control over? The problem with free will is that we believe determinism is true, but also that we are morally responsible; meaning we are held responsible for the actions we choose.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Free will is the known as the capability to decide between different potential courses of action and is a highly questioned topic in the philosophical world. Free will, also closely accompanied to the views of moral responsibility, has some philosophers reason that only actions which are free willed are justified to accept the blame of the action while other philosophers oppose this view. Baron d’Holbach views free will under the idea of Determinism, which entails that only one sequence of actions is possible, which concludes that there is no such thing as free will or choice in the truly deterministic world. In contrast, Compatibilist theorists, like Stace, assert that free will exists and can be well-matched with Determinism.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “Problems of Philosophy”, Chapter 9: “The Debate Over Free Will”, James Rachels and Stuart Rachels, investigate over freewill. Throughout the chapter the authors discuss what free will means and the ways to evaluate if we are free. The chapter moves towards the Free Will Argument using the Determinist Argument, the Libertarian Response, the Compatibilist Response and additionally covering the ethics involved with the chapter of free will. The chapter begins with the determinist argument which claims that everything that happens must happen, given the law of nature and the history of the universe.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For centuries philosophers have been debating the concepts of free will and whether it exists or it’s a mere illusion. Over the years, many different theories have been hindering the answer behind this complex concept. Many different philosophers discuss different ideals such as compatibilism and determinism. Both the combatalist and the hard determinist feel there's no escaping fate, however there differences lies on one major concept — free will. Even though an individual's fate may remain fixed, the compatibilist view concludes that humans still possess free will.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Paradise Lost, God is very willing to give Adam and Eve their free will, as he did not want to create them and them force them to worship him. He wanted to give them the opportunity to choose for himself and make their own decisions. This is the exact opposite attitude of the people who possess the ability to grant Oroonoko his free will. The first of the two is the king who holds power over Oroonoko in his time in Africa. He was not willing at all to give Oroonoko any freedom, as he was interested in his own self-interests first and foremost.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The debate of Free Will v Determinism is one that has gone on for centuries, and shall continue to go on for many to come. There are many who believe that their view is the end all, be all, correct view to hold. While not all of these thinkers are correct in their standings, Paul Holbach’s essay, “The Illusion of Free Will,” lays out a strong argument for universal determinism; man does not have any free will, and all of his actions are determined by the laws of nature. His argument is one that is accurate and strong, leaving little to criticize, despite what many believe to be proof that he is incorrect: the presence of choice and the absence of restraint. He takes these two beliefs and shows exactly why they do not denote free will, and all…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Determinism And Free Will

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It seems that determinism are in conflict with free will. Compatibilism is a concept that free will and determinism are compatible. In this paper, I will first state the contradiction between free will and determinism, then illustrate what is compatibilism, with most of the the problem that a compatibilist would face regarding freedom. To begin, determinism is that “human behavior is entirely governed by causal law” (Ayer, 1954, p.271).…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The consistency that exists between the divine foreknowledge possessed by God and an individual’s ability to freely choose what they desire is an issue discussed by Augustine in his work Free choice of will bk. 3. Inherently, the ideals of divine foreknowledge and free choice of will are contradictory to one another as is it is impossible for an individual to possess free choice of will if the outcome that awaits the individual is known to God. Divine foreknowledge, which allows God the capacity to foresee the outcomes of an individual's choices prior to their actions, makes it impossible for an individual to act otherwise as God would also possess foreknowledge of their intent to do so. Therefore, an individual cannot be free.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The current debate around the openness of God is one that needs to be addressed as it is a debate that questions the very nature of God. This essay endeavours to look at the two opposing views and outline the main issues that are being debated. I will then look at why the issues being discussed are important for how we approach theology and Christian living. The two sides of the debate that we will be discussing are made up of those supporting ‘classical’ theism and those supporting ‘free will’ or ‘open’ theism.…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is free will compatible with determinism? That’s the most philosophical question asked. Free will is the power or ability to make a choice for which one can be held responsible for. Determinism is the thesis that at any time the universe has one physically possibility in the future. Compatibilisim is the thesis that we can have free will in a deterministic world.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction I. In this paper, I will be arguing for the following claim that we, human beings are not predetermined beings, but rather we have free will. It has long been argued that people are not free and do not have free will; that rather than having free will we live in a world that is predetermined. That our choices and actions are reflections of and happen because of a long line of other choices and action that caused the present, and thus we have a fixed future. This is just not the case.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free Will and Determinism have been discussed by philosophers for many years. Free will is associated with moral responsibility, and alternative actions that “could have” been taken over the one chosen. Determinism is the opposite view, and is associated with universal causation, and a lack of free will. Determinists believe that a person’s actions are inevitable, they are dictated by a person’s experiences, they believe nurture, nature, and even a person’s genes determine their future actions. Because of this determinists believe people hold no moral responsibility for their actions.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, the question always remains the same. Do we actually have free will? And how can we be certain that we are fully exercising it? For centuries, many Philosophers have argued, whether Free Will exist and as human…

    • 1101 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays