Pros And Cons Of Classical Theism

Superior Essays
The current debate around the openness of God is one that needs to be addressed as it is a debate that questions the very nature of God. This essay endeavours to look at the two opposing views and outline the main issues that are being debated. I will then look at why the issues being discussed are important for how we approach theology and Christian living.
The two sides of the debate that we will be discussing are made up of those supporting ‘classical’ theism and those supporting ‘free will’ or ‘open’ theism. Classical theism, which has been the chief view held by Christians for many years, states that God is immutable, impassable, omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient which includes knowing the future perfectly and all of the decisions that
…show more content…
One of the really big questions that open theists ask is ‘Does God actually know exactly what is going to happen in the future?’ The classical theist would say yes, he knows everything that is going to happen and all the decisions that will be made but an open theist would suggest that God is omniscient in that he knows everything that can be conceivably known and this does not include the future free actions of …show more content…
If God has no absolute foreknowledge of events then how can He give infallible prophecies? Open theism has addressed this by defining three different types of prophecy; Conditional prophecy, predictive prophecy and fulfilment prophecy. Conditional prophecy are those prophecies thats purpose is to bring God’s people back to Him. Predictive prophecies are those that are made knowing that the outcome of the prophecy is the most likely for example the hardening of Pharaohs heart and fulfilment prophecies are those that will come true because God has willed it to be fulfilled and He will make sure that it happens i.e. That Jesus would rise after three days occurred not because God foresaw that it would take three days but because the prophecy said three days He then made it happen on the third day. These defences along with the free will defence for evil seem to be too convenient and many of the solutions to problems that arise from open theism seem more to be ways of making light of heavy philosophical issues. It is in my opinion that these issues appear to be more convenient than

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He has seen everything, the past, the future and everything in between. Nothing comes as a surprise to him. Therefore we have no free will and every decision we make has been foreseen by God himself. “You insist that those things of the future are inevitable if God can see them, but you must admit that not even men can make inevitable those things that they see.” (171).…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Response to McCloskey’s Article Shamyra Thompson Liberty University Introduction In the short article On Being an Atheist, H.J. McCloskey discusses several arguments pertaining to the whether or no there is a God and what one believes to be evil. McCloskey also refers to the arguments as “proof” as well as implied several times that they can’t define or establish the existence of God. In the light of Foreman’s comments in regards to the question of God’s existence, I felt that he addressed the question by discussing the commonly asked question “Is there a God or if a God exist”. He also discussed what exactly is evil.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Moreover, who made God's maker? The risk of a boundless relapse of makers, each hypothesized with a specific end goal to clarify the presence of that coming to it, looms. By chance that there is a vast relapse of makers, however, at that point there is no first maker, no extreme reason for the universe, no God. Maybe, at that point, the theist ought to keep up that God doesn't have a maker, that he is an uncaused reason. In the event that uncaused presence is conceivable, however, at that point there is no compelling reason to hypothesize a God that made the universe; if uncaused presence is conceivable, at that point the universe could be…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the essay “The Will to Believe” by William James, the main problem that he is questioning is determinism. The questions and problems he addresses are related to Religion and Epistemology. The questions and problems are related to religion because he ties religion in with his arguments and related to epistemology because he talks about justifying belief. The questions and problems are also related to Epistemology because the arguments are about belief and knowledge. William James used perspectives of reality in this selection by perception of truth and religion.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    God is all knowing. His divine intellect, or omniscience, is undeniable when examining scripture. There is an overflow of scripture to back up the claim that there is nothing and no one more intelligent, more knowledgable or wise than God. We get understanding of God's omniscience from the writings of David.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He may be omniscient, but does that mean when he pushes us past our limits, that he is doing this on purpose? Being not as wholly good as we thought he was? Richard Swinburne fails to address his claim’s supporting evidence in detail as he only addresses the topic with the use of confirmation bias. There is a lot that happens in a parent-child relationship, but Swinburne only addresses what benefits his claim and only explores the general portions of it. Everyone has their limits, and God knows well what our limits are because he created humans.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The problem of evil has been a consistent argument coming from both theists and atheists for ages. In this paper the argument will be examined from both sides, the article A Simpler Free Will Defense” will be summarized, and I will analyze the article and additionally explain why my side of the argument is correct. The question that stands is “if there is a God how does he let evil occur?” Is it that this God cannot prevent the evil, which goes against the typical theist view that God is omnipotent, or will he not prevent evil, which goes against the concept of an omnibenevolent God. In an excerpt from The Philosophers Way John Hick talks about how evil can be allowed while still having an omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omnipresent God…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Calvinists have three different ways of understanding divine omniscience, “One is… God’s knowledge is the cause of things… second sense is that in which the foreknowledge of God is logically subsequent to his decree… the third and weakest sense is a sense of divine foreknowledge that is logically prior to God’s decree; it is in the light of what he foreknows that that God decrees this or that; what he decrees is conditioned by what he foreknows. ”(Helm 163) Helm says that there are two kinds of omniscience, strong omniscience- or the degree of knowledge that encompasses all events past, present, and future, and weak omniscience- any omniscience that is less than strong omniscience. Calvinists believe in strong omniscience and that God is all knowing in every aspect, including his knowledge of the…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Rowe talks about the problem of Divine Foreknowledge and free will when he states, "Things occur not because God foreknows them; rather, he foreknows them because they occur" (Rowe, 150). Rowe perfectly explains how God has seen the future but has not pre-determined that the event will happen. God knows what happens because he is looking at every minute of time all at once. God to be totally all knowing and be the divine being that people believe that he is, God must know everything and understand what is going on at any given moment. God does not determine what will happen, humans decide what will happen, because of our free will.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are two standard requirements for free will: alternate possibilities and ultimate responsibility. Alternate possibilities mean that the metaphorical path before any agent must be one with forking paths. In terms of alternate possibilities, free will requires the ability to do otherwise. In other words, open futures are necessary for free will to exist. This leads to the second condition for free will: ultimate responsibility.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction I. In this paper, I will be arguing for the following claim that we, human beings are not predetermined beings, but rather we have free will. It has long been argued that people are not free and do not have free will; that rather than having free will we live in a world that is predetermined. That our choices and actions are reflections of and happen because of a long line of other choices and action that caused the present, and thus we have a fixed future. This is just not the case.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So an example of this being would be from the bible, in Roman 8:29-30 it basically says that he knew in advance that he was going to choose him to be his son and having the right for him to call upon them and stand by him with all his brothers and sisters. So it shows that God new in advance what he was planning to do and having heaven and hell so that they could all stand together. Also another example would be in Ephesians 1:5,11 and that says that God had decided in advance that he was going to adopt us into his own family and bring himself though Jesus Christ. So it shows that he had a plan all along to have a place for all of us to go like heaven to come together and live with him, for the ones that choose…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Flexibility Of Will

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. That God could prevent evil actions and preserve human freedom of will Oftentimes, doubters will assert that God could have kept an insidiousness and safeguard flexibility of will; on the other hand, it is essential that if the recent is to exist then the previous can't. Flexibility of will involves the capacity to act as per one's sentiments and decisions with no outside obstruction. Any confinement set on these two fundamentally prompts lost individual opportunity as an outside power decided a singular's conduct and not the individual themselves. In spite of the fact that God intervenes in human's lives through the utilization of supernatural occurrences, this does not imply that he always mediates.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free will is an extremely important concept in John Milton’s Paradise Lost that greatly impacts the fateful decision made by Adam and Eve. Many questions are raised in the face of a notion such as free will, which prompt the reader and Milton to understand God’s logic and Adam and Eve’s reasoning for turning their backs on it. God makes his new creations “just and right / sufficient to have stood, though free to fall,” and, therefore, obtain the explicitly stated ability to turn against God. The first instance of free will the reader sees is Satan’s decision to rebel against God and attempt to defeat Him and all of the angels that joined him in his efforts. Although God experiences this defiance and is forced to punish Satan for his…

    • 1028 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There has been many different theories about the topic of Free will. For instance, does free will even truly exist, is it defined by our own religious beliefs or is it simply brought on by cause and effect. Free will is nothing more than our own personal freedom to make choices in our lives. It can be brought on by an urge or naturally carefree feeling, to be able to choose with out the interference or opinions of others. A free course of action driven by our own means of self gratification for the betterment of oneself.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays