After reading the assigned material for this week, I do not think that athletes should receive money for playing NCAA sports. In the article, “US College Connection”, Posnanski reports all of the incentives that college athletes are given. For example, NCAA athletes are provided with free tuition, room and board, access to exceptional facilities, and the best coaches and doctors. The list continues on. If the system were to start paying athletes for participating in sport, it brings up several questions of where this money would come from and if all college athletes would get paid commission.…
The NCAA "maximizes its profits by steadily expanding regular season games," but "the players have no voice in these decisions to expand the schedule" (Sanderson and Siegfried). College athletes should be paid because the NCAA uses their power to stretch out as much money possible by using the athletes to their advantage without paying them for their services. However, arguers try to say that this is acceptable because they are students and are not employees and should not expect to get paid, but if this proposition turns out to be true, then the NCAA is treating the athletes as if they are…
Due to NCAA rules, athletes have not been allowed compensation for their participation in college athletics. This rule has caused a great divide and debate within the collegiate sport world, especially with the recent exponential growth of college athletics. For instance, college sports critics Val Ackerman and Larry Scott argue “that college is ultimately about getting a degree and getting ready for life long after their playing days are over” supporting their claim that college athletes should not be paid (Ackerman and Scott). Opposing that view is the idea that college athletics offer exactly those benefits and more, which would be maximized with payment. As of right now, college athletes are being compensated through scholarships that average…
It is obvious that there is not enough money to pay every student athlete. In the article there is discussion of rewarding football and basketball players because they bring the highest income in. This would be unfair to other athletes. Ann Mayo, director of sport management at Seton Hall says, “says athletes in other sports, such as swimming or track and field, are no less dedicated than those in the money-making sports. Yet because many athletes in the non-revenue-generating sports know they will not go pro, they concentrate on taking advantage of the educational opportunity provided by their scholarship” (Karaim).…
Even though there are reasons why NCAA athletes should not be paid, there are many reasons why NCAA athletes should get paid. Paying college athletes help introduce investments and other important things involving finance. Many of these players blamed,…
Pay for Play? Dave Anderson, Laura Freedman, Lee Goldman, and Peter Goplereus III have all written articles on whether or not the NCAA should pay their student athletes. Their articles, “Top 10 Reasons College Athletes Should be Paid”, “Pay or Play”, “Should College Athletes Be Paid”, and “No Control Over Their Rights” all provide many reasons as to why student athletes deserve payment. The NCAA is in the wrong for accepting “free labor” from these athletes. Although many student athletes are on scholarships, often times it is not enough, so they deserve fair compensation.…
Athletics have been a part of colleges for over a century, but are they really worth all the time and money that they are given? It is a common myth that college athletic programs bring in tons of money for their school, but in reality, most athletic programs do not make enough money to support themselves. The main purpose of attending any school is to receive an education and become prepared for the real world. That is something often forgotten by student-athletes and schools themselves. Contrary to popular belief, eliminating athletics from college will have more benefits than keeping them.…
Although many athletes are given scholarships, they still can fall in debt to other things such as books, living, and extras. Meshefijian stated, “In the past twelve years, the amount of money generated by sports has increased nearly 300%” (par. 3). Student athletes lose the opportunity to have a job for a majority of their time because they are preoccupied by games, practices, conditioning, and on top of that they must also be a full time student and maintain a GPA that keeps them eligible to participate in their sport. College scholarships can only support a student for so much. Earning a salary would substitute the money they would be earning if they were able to have a job.…
The athletes should not be asking for money from the NCAA and rather their parents. There are some cases in which an athlete’s family does not have the finances to be able to provide their child with the things they might need but these athletes can sacrifice an $8 meal at McDonalds and they can just go to the school cafeteria to eat a meal instead. Many sacrifices can be made by these students in order to make life suitable for these athletes rather than giving them…
The first reason why student athletes should be paid is because scholarships that NCAA give to students don’t always cover full expenses (Christopher Davis Jr / Dylan Oliver Malagrino 2013). Universities promise students 4 year scholarships when NCAA only give 1 year scholarships and at any moment take the scholarship back if injuries happen or encounter takes place. Some scholarships cover the classes, books, and maybe dorms but leave out food, transportation or health coverage.…
With many athletes being in poverty the NCAA should provide them with extra money. Even though they receive scholarships as a form of pay they are not able to take full advantage of receiving the scholarships. Without the work and dedication of the Athletes the NCAA and colleges would not make as much money or as many students. The NCAA and universities are not the only ones who receive big money, the coaching staff does too with the help of the athletes. The current system of not paying athletes does not make sense because if they did the NCAA would make more money and college sports would be more entertaining so by paying athletes everyone would benefit, you could say its a win win…
The NCAA mission is to promote student athlete success in both classroom and competition play (Southall 2015). Athletes represents a small percentage of students who earn full scholarship money (Southall 2015). They spend around 2.7 billion dollars per student athlete a year (Southall 2015). Most of these school pay for everything, but for some division two schools (Southall 2015). These schools only pay for part of a student's tuition for school, because some feel like that athletics should not be applied to the classroom setting (Southall 2015).…
College is a time to prepare those for a career that lies ahead where they will make a living. Scholarships are already paying athletes to represent their school. A vast majority of schools are not making a profit off their athletic programs, and have no way to pay their athletes. There also would be no way in determining how much each athlete deserves to get paid. All in all, there are too many uncertainties when it comes to this topic.…
This results in many people trying to sue the NCAA because they believe this isn’t fair but that is another discussion. College athletes deserve to be paid based on all they do for their university. Works Cited Edwards, Harry. “Share the Wealth” 16 December 2011. Web.…
Compared to the 317 million American citizens that sum is extremely small. The probability of an athlete even making it to the professional level is slim to none. According to the NCAA there is a 0.03% chance of a high school athlete going to the pros. There is a 1.2% chance of a college athlete going pro (NCAA 1). Around the U.S. over 30 million children compete in youth sports.…