Instruments have family's just like use. And the members in the family aren't always the same. For example some of the members in the Woodwind family are Clarinet,Oboe,Violin,and Flute. Notice the Flute is not made out of wood. Playing an instrument should not be a requirement but something pleasurable aside from school because,not every child want or like to play an instrument,many of the students can't afford the instruments,and all students are different there brains react to things differently then others.
Students should have a say in what they do specially on taking such big responsibility. Not every child likes music. They might be interested in art,sports,or dance. In source #3 it states that''Students might have other responsibilities".Students shouldn't over work its against the law plus given them so much to do may take the fun away from their childhood. In source #3 it says that "It might have a negative affect". There's a saying you can take a horse to the lake but you can't force it to drink. It's nice to be introduced to new things but if the student has a passion for something else like art or sports you can't and shouldn't force them to play an …show more content…
In source #3 it says that "The students are on different levels and that being taken out of class or taking away study time would not be the best of benefits for the student and it's true". Many students are on the edge, failing classes and having trouble at home. Playing an instrument as a way to relax and move from reality is understandable but having it as a requirement would make it worse for the student. In source #1 i states that "Families might ant their kids to focus more on their school work". Many people would agree that having a career and a degree is better than playing an instrument especially one that you were forced to play. Kids already don't like school, don't drive them away even
Students should have a say in what they do specially on taking such big responsibility. Not every child likes music. They might be interested in art,sports,or dance. In source #3 it states that''Students might have other responsibilities".Students shouldn't over work its against the law plus given them so much to do may take the fun away from their childhood. In source #3 it says that "It might have a negative affect". There's a saying you can take a horse to the lake but you can't force it to drink. It's nice to be introduced to new things but if the student has a passion for something else like art or sports you can't and shouldn't force them to play an …show more content…
In source #3 it says that "The students are on different levels and that being taken out of class or taking away study time would not be the best of benefits for the student and it's true". Many students are on the edge, failing classes and having trouble at home. Playing an instrument as a way to relax and move from reality is understandable but having it as a requirement would make it worse for the student. In source #1 i states that "Families might ant their kids to focus more on their school work". Many people would agree that having a career and a degree is better than playing an instrument especially one that you were forced to play. Kids already don't like school, don't drive them away even