Stricter Gun Control Laws

Improved Essays
Gun Control How would you feel if the Government took away your guns and made stricter gun laws? Stricter gun laws wouldn’t accomplish anything, they would not solve the issue at hand. Guns don’t commit crimes, the person who is holding the gun commits a crime. More gun control laws are already in place and they should not take guns away from law-abiding citizens who carry for self defense. A lot of people think that taking away guns will make it impossible for a criminal to get and gun and that it will also lower crime rates involving weapons. “The Proposition you can vicariously control criminal or psychopathic behaviour by confiscating private property and burying law-abiding citizens under a mountain of regulations is absurd” (Falco,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Strict Gun Laws

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Laws on gun control can put people at odds. Some want loose guns laws that do not interfere much, while others want strict laws that regulate more. Gun control and gun law is a debated topic between many. Gun laws and restrictions can both hurt and help people in multiple ways. Gun laws and regulations have come from many circumstances.…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control has been extremely controversial in society for years. In the essay “Just Take Away Their Guns,” James Q. Wilson argues his view on stricter gun control laws. He writes, “Legal restraints on the lawful purchase of guns will have little effect on the illegal use of guns” (Wilson, 1994, p.125). He backs up his statement with the statistics that 5/6 of handguns used in crimes are either stolen or purchased privately. With this being said, he displays that increasing legal restraints on purchasing guns will have little to no effect on the use of guns to commit crimes.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Society has been split into two over whether or not guns should be banned, but there needs to be a solution where both parties can be happy. Anti-gun advocates present reasoning why guns should be banned. McMahan’s main two arguments of why guns should be banned: one, guns in the community creates a more dangerous environment; and two, the police have less of a power to protect citizens when society has guns (Shafer-Landau, The Ethical Life (EL) 390). McMahan explains that communities are not going to be free of crimes with more people carrying around guns, because criminals will be more prepared, efficient, and quicker to grab and shoot their target (Shafer-Landau, EL 392-392). People with guns will be safer than people without guns, because they do not have a gun to protect themselves.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Have the recent incidents like the Las Vegas mass shooting change people’s perspective on gun control like it did to mine? Gun control is an issue that has been highly debated. Although most people believe in our second amendment in the right to bare arms, there is an overwhelming amount of pressure on Congress. There should be more restrictions on purchasing guns for citizens to prevent future mass shootings and Congress should pass stricter laws.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    People from both ends of the political spectrum despise guns in such a way that they believe taking away guns from law abiding citizens will make the world a safer place in which to live. Others contend that, in many cases, making it easier for citizens to own guns will discourage criminals from attacking others. In order to find the solution to this ongoing debate, we will look into the history, statistics, and general facts about how gun control affects crime…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The issue of gun control has attracted significant debate between those that believe that controlling the access to guns will reduce crime and those that assert gun control will not only be a measure that has impact on reducing crimes, but also an action that violates the rights granted to citizens by the United States Constitution; 2nd Amendment, Bill of Rights (Steidley, pg. 123). It is a contested thought that controlling the access to firearms will take away the ability to commit violent crimes therefore reducing crime rates. The opposition to this claim suggests that the actions of criminals pertaining to violent crime do not necessarily relate to access to firearms, rather they are simply an element of character and opportunity. Gun control would restrict the legal purchase of firearms by legitimate citizens who will use the weapons in accordance with local, state and federal laws. Mutual agreement between both sides of the argument also acknowledge there will be exceptions to these separated stances on the Gun Control debate (Steidley, 2016).…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Guns will reduce crime rates because when a gun is given to the right hand, it is expected to be used the right way. However, if the gun is given to the wrong hands, the government is to blame for not revising the necessary gun laws (CNN.org). “This philosophy of an armed citizenry, in which every citizen is a soldier and every soldier a citizen, was subsequently codified in the U.S.” (Patrick J. Charles). This has further been consented by today’s president-elect Donald J. Trump as he eagerly promised to veto and unsign each gun strictive law signed by the President of the United States “so fast” (CNN.org). However, It is crucial for all Americans that the second amendment of the constitution is set to be revised as it may reflect the older generation more than it does now.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control is Not the Solution Increased Gun Control in the United States is absurd, useless, and unnecessary. In order to increase safety all throughout the United States time and effort must not be spent towards limiting gun owners of their rights. The tragic rash of school, religious, and workplace shootings has turned up the heat on the public conversation about guns. In nearly all of these cases gun laws would not have stopped the shooters from obtaining a firearm.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Right To Bear Arms

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Many people believe that taking away our right to bear arms will reduce the amount of crime committed, and in some ways that is true, but also in other ways it’s not. Criminals are still going to commit a crime whether they have the right to own that gun or not.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In English class we had to write a paper about how we need gun control and how it would affect the U.S. While I was writing the paper it was hard to argue most topics like “if guns are banned and there is a crime, you are sitting a duck waiting for the police to come save you. While if you were allowed to carry you would be able to save or help in the situation. How is banning guns going to help the innocent American people who are sitting ducks?” These kind of question got me thinking we don’t need any more gun control, we need guns to protect the American people.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Increased Gun Control

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Increased Gun Control While the Obama Administration is attempting to put restrictions on and do away with some specific guns, criminals are finding them on the black market and purchasing them illegally. Putting restrictions on gun ownership violates the 2nd Amendment right, which is the right of the people to keep and bear arms, and the right to self defense. The key to keeping our nation safe is not having armed citizens, we need experienced and informed citizens. We need to put more focus on the values of our people, the part media plays in the violence and reporting it, and also the huge lack of respect for law enforcement.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Restrictions

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Should Guns be taken away from law abiding American citizens? Is it possible to get the millions of guns off the streets? If the American government is successful with additional measures, will America reap the benefits of more pungent gun restrictions? There has been significant divide as of lately between liberals and conservative over the great gun debate. With each passing gun murder or attack, liberals protest to protect the American people with gun control.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Guns Should Be Banned

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This was not the original purpose for guns, guns were used to protect what people want to protect. Banning guns would not reduce the crime rate in America, since criminals and psychos obtain weapons illegally anyway, all the government would be doing is preventing citizens from getting guns to protect themselves. If the government decides to ban guns, they…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Laws

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should all guns be banned from public use and/or purchase? This is a question that has been argued back and forth for years, and both sides bring excellent points to the matter. While guns are dangerous in the hands of bad people, civilians should be allowed to continue owning guns because the ban of guns would break the constitution, civilians that own guns save lives, and guns are not at fault for shootings. Gun supporters argue they should be allowed to continue owning guns because the ban of guns would break the constitution. According to the second amendment any man or woman has the right to bear arms for protection.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although Lafollette finds the evidence that gun ownership prevents crime questionable, there are many studies showing that gun ownership proves beneficial to society. For example, a study analyzing the impact of eighteen major types of gun control laws, invloving all major types of violent crimes throughout one hundred and seventy cities in the United States, concluded that gun restrictions generally had no effect on suicide and violent crime rates (Kleck and Patterson 1993). In order to justify taking away citizens prima facie rights, gun abolition would need to save more lives than it costs. Even if the there was a strong correlation between guns and crime, abolition or restrictions wouldn’t stop the ability of getting a firearm. For the same reason as alcohol prohibition, gun abolition would fail as well.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays