In an age of media and resources galore, many students are faced with many the question of “should i take the easy way out?” in regards to their work. We wonder if the word ‘crime’ ever lingers within their mind as they continue with a quick swipe of ‘copy and paste’. That being said it is within the school 's best interest to attempt to annihilate that realm of oblivion, and produce an outcome of original and morally secure students. This valued process though,could place grave pressure on individuals, making their focus oriented on both themselves as well as the whole class. This method is full of good intent, but a student form of weeding out cheaters can be hindered simply by priority, in the average student 's case, their own work. The RHS could use little to no revision on the policies they 've established. The concepts are fair and understanding. What is missing is, Students should be informed and educated on the importance of the honor code in order to effectively embed it in the school function. A lack of education on the matter, and self awareness of the cons of plagiarism, the severity of it can be seen as just another ‘rule’. Students and teacher should equally contribute to the elimination of cheating when establishing and preventing people who commit said actions. What leaves students aware and opposed plagiarism is often not the concept within itself, but the fear of getting caught.
…show more content…
In source A, an image is displayed of a committee on the use of the honor code against cheating. A notable quote from there is “Recent research has shows that a spycam can greatly improve the honor code.” In other word this is a light illustration that reflects the brainstorming process staff undergo to create such a process. The reason this is significant, as i mentioned prior, is that fear students have of getting caught over the embarrassment of plagiarizing itself. Spy cams would only further the ‘what if’ that would keep one from cheating. This opens up the discussion whether we should not do something because could get exposed, or we should not do this because it 's an educational set back. It also just show 's that the basis in how teachers are brainstorming. This also meets evidence in Source F, in the reason behind this, “Yet research indicated that the significant lower levels of cheating reported at honor code schools do not reflect a greater fear of being reported or caught,” and continued, “Many students would simply be embarrassed to have other students find out they were cheating.” The embarrassment must stem from the Idea that must stem from the pressures of others excelling in their work. Which could be also be improved by more teacher student interaction when it comes to the process of writing. Guidance and being informed can change the process students experience into a more productive way. I believe that also, improvement in the honor code could be established by student I put and participation, as displayed also by Source F when pertaining to the success of number out colleges, “The key to their success seems to be encouraging students involvement in developing community standards on academic dishonesty and ensuring their subsequent acceptance by larger student community.” in other words stressing the importance of involving students on academic decisions that shape their learning. Rules based off of assumption how it 'll affect the person it is placed on are never solid. Having a more in inclusive structure makes things followable and more respected/taken seriously. Source E puts concepts in numbers to this concept, when only 42% of students did not know of the penalties for plagiarism and only 48% beloved that the code was enforced fairly. This shows that this particular school is divided and not everyone 's perception of the honor code is within the same range. some kids remain unaware of what the overall process works, and that disconnect could be what 's hindering the success of this honor code. Source E displays statistics of taken by a student council, displaying a range of beliefs from students and more on the matter of the honor code. One statistic given on ‘students who would report a fellow student for cheating’ only resonated with 8% of the 275 people surveyed. This is something that can not really be fixed as it is human nature
In source A, an image is displayed of a committee on the use of the honor code against cheating. A notable quote from there is “Recent research has shows that a spycam can greatly improve the honor code.” In other word this is a light illustration that reflects the brainstorming process staff undergo to create such a process. The reason this is significant, as i mentioned prior, is that fear students have of getting caught over the embarrassment of plagiarizing itself. Spy cams would only further the ‘what if’ that would keep one from cheating. This opens up the discussion whether we should not do something because could get exposed, or we should not do this because it 's an educational set back. It also just show 's that the basis in how teachers are brainstorming. This also meets evidence in Source F, in the reason behind this, “Yet research indicated that the significant lower levels of cheating reported at honor code schools do not reflect a greater fear of being reported or caught,” and continued, “Many students would simply be embarrassed to have other students find out they were cheating.” The embarrassment must stem from the Idea that must stem from the pressures of others excelling in their work. Which could be also be improved by more teacher student interaction when it comes to the process of writing. Guidance and being informed can change the process students experience into a more productive way. I believe that also, improvement in the honor code could be established by student I put and participation, as displayed also by Source F when pertaining to the success of number out colleges, “The key to their success seems to be encouraging students involvement in developing community standards on academic dishonesty and ensuring their subsequent acceptance by larger student community.” in other words stressing the importance of involving students on academic decisions that shape their learning. Rules based off of assumption how it 'll affect the person it is placed on are never solid. Having a more in inclusive structure makes things followable and more respected/taken seriously. Source E puts concepts in numbers to this concept, when only 42% of students did not know of the penalties for plagiarism and only 48% beloved that the code was enforced fairly. This shows that this particular school is divided and not everyone 's perception of the honor code is within the same range. some kids remain unaware of what the overall process works, and that disconnect could be what 's hindering the success of this honor code. Source E displays statistics of taken by a student council, displaying a range of beliefs from students and more on the matter of the honor code. One statistic given on ‘students who would report a fellow student for cheating’ only resonated with 8% of the 275 people surveyed. This is something that can not really be fixed as it is human nature