Small Change Malcolm Gladwell Analysis

As of 2014, 38 percent of suicide cases were related or caused by social media. Scientist further investigated this correlation and found out that 50 billion of contents are shared monthly using social media. Many of us question this outrageous catastrophe, but to truly understand the immense power behind social media, details must be acquired. Identifying the details of social media, social media is a relatively new phenomenon that has lingered this world for the past decade. With the fusing of technology, internet-based applications have allowed the sharing of messages, thoughts, and details at the speed of light. The dawning of the new age has come, where social media is an extension of our body, exhibiting our everyday lifestyle. In Malcolm Gladwell’s essay “Small change”, he described the many viewpoints on the impacts of modern technologies such as social identity, communication dynamics, and even the effect of social media on activism. He clarifies social media by drafting a comparison of events from the various ages we dwelled. I will be discussing how Gladwell disrupts the flow of his writing with wrongful conjunctions of supporting details, thus, confusing his crowd and the unfair comparison of his supporting detail. However, Gladwell creatively described the meaning of weak and strong ties corresponding to activism by applying historic happenings to support his ideas. In “Small Changes,” Malcolm Gladwell describes the correlation of social media to social, political, economic, and environmental changes, also known as activism. To begin with, Gladwell shifted into historic circumstances, ranging from the early 1960s to the 21st century. World events and revolution are used to create the images needed to comprehend further details. Furthermore, Gladwell described the interrelationship of weak ties in social media. In addition, he defined strong ties where it is showing dominance in eras without social media. After revealing the setting, Gladwell guides his readers through a historic standpoint, referencing the past to describe the effectiveness of social media. Bipolar is characterized by extreme changes in mood and is also a wonderful description of this short excerpt. …show more content…
Gladwell constantly disrupts the flow of his writing, featuring confusion in his reading. First, I found it disturbing that there was no chronological order of what Gladwell is trying to portray. An example can be found when Gladwell started his saga with the historic reference of the story of Woolworth’s lunch counter. Furthermore, the introduction shifted in various ways, misleading points as it changed from scenario to another. I am well aware Gladwell’s plot to intertwine his thoughts in between each scenario, but it wound up the destruction of the build-up of his thesis. After a recollection of his excerpt, I found out there are actually more details about the historic scenarios than his message towards his readers. Overall, I was not impressed with the bouncing of archives. Researchers have concluded that humans are considered to be most knowledgeable being in this universe. If I were to compare humans to the pandas (labeled as the world’s slow-witted animal) for an intelligence competition, there is no doubt that humans will prove triumph. Apparently, Gladwell seems to enjoy replicating my previous example of comparing humans to panda. I am truly disappointed that Gladwell has successfully implemented the same concept towards his writing, “Small Changes.” For instance, Gladwell brought out the historic uprisings and compared to unworthy events, undermining the effects of social media. In addition, Gladwell quotes unnecessary thoughts defining strong ties and weak ties based on false comparison. Accordingly, there are major happenings in this new era, but Gladwell either refused to utilize these remarkable happenings or he deliberately planned these unfair comparisons. Either way, dishonest exploits can result in a decrease of readers as well as winning any arguments made. Considering the many errors Gladwell has produced, I have gained invaluable information through his writing. More importantly, he introduced a new light within my soul, drawing out the potential and influence of social media. “Social networks are effective at increasing participation” (Gladwell 235) stated Gladwell; exemplify the beauty the magnificent tool, social media. Gladwell exhilarates my soul by pinpointing such knowledge regarding both sides of strong and weak ties. He had not only listed the positive effects in regards to social media, but also allowed us to view both standpoints of strong and weak ties through