Should The NFL Team's Name Controversy

Great Essays
In 2014, the debate heats up over one NFL team's name

Washington Redskins logo
Related Links

Poll: Should the Washington Redskins change their name?
The NFL Drops the Ball on Domestic Violence
Coming Out While Still in the Game
2014 Current Events

The ongoing Washington Redskins name controversy heated up in 2014. On June 18, in a 2-1 decision, the United States Patent and Trademark Office ruled that some of the trademark protections of the Washington Redskins were invalid and stated that the use of the team name "Redskins" constituted an ethnic slur. A month before the ruling, Senator Harry Reid and 49 other Democratic senators asked Goodell to push the Redskins owners to change the name. Attorney General Eric Holder and former Secretary
…show more content…
In fact, team officials planned to appeal the decision, stating that they have no intention of changing the name. However, should they not win an appeal and the decision be upheld, counterfeiters could manufacture knockoff Washington Redskins merchandise.

Public Opinion

According to a 2014 Associated Press poll, 14% believed that the team should change its name. In 1992, ABC News ran a similar poll where only 7% said the team should change its name. While support for the name change has increased, but it is still a minority. However, in a recent poll by the Center for Indigenous Peoples Studies at California State University, 67% of Native Americans believed that the “team name was a racial or racist word and symbol.” In the same poll, 32.8% of Caucasians agreed that the team name was racist.

In Sept., the Osage Nation chief asked all tribal employees not to use FedEx until the Redskins change their name. The Redskins play all their home games at FedEx field in Landover, Maryland. "Until the name of the NFL team is changed to something less inflammatory and insulting, I direct all employees to refrain from using FedEx when there is an alternative available," Osage Nation Chief Geoffrey M. Standing Bear wrote in a letter to all
…show more content…
The report states that due to the deeply offensive nature of the Washington football team, the team is referred to as “Redsk*ns” or the “R Word” in the report. The report points out several states, including Wisconsin, Michigan, and Oregon have passed legislature urging or in some cases banning American Indian references used as mascots, team names, or logos. Finally, the report names other professional sports teams continue to profit from harmful stereotypes by using Native American names. Along with the Redskins, the teams named are the NFL’s Kansas City Chiefs, Major League Baseball’s Atlanta Braves and Cleveland Indians, and the National Hockey League’s Chicago Black Hawks.

On Oct. 12, 2014, Navajo Nation president Ben Shelly was an honored guest of Washington Redskins owner Daniel Snyder. Wearing a Redskins hat, Shelly sat next to Snyder in the owner’s box during a game between the Redskins and the Arizona Cardinals. The appearance only raised more debate about the name change. Critics of the name saw it as a blatant PR more. Defenders of the tame name saw it as a public showing of support. However, Shelly has been at odds with his tribal council, a council that voted 9-2 in April 2014, to officially oppose the Redskins name. Moreover, Shelly’s one term as president ends in Jan.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    JoJo Henderson Ms. Gay ENGL 1301.22 20 Oct. 2015 Textual Rhetorical Analysis: “Goodell Defends Redskins’ Name” In the last seventy-five years there have been effortless attempts by protesters to rid the Washington football organization of the “Redskins” nickname. In 2013, protesters were assisted by ten U.S. Congress members in the effort to strip the organization of their beloved mascot. These congress members wrote a letter filled with their concerns to Roger Goodell (NFL Commissioner) along with Dan Snyder (Washington Redskins Franchise Owner) and also to every NFL organization in the league.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Chief Wahoo Logo Analysis

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This change would mean that the offensive logo would be less emphasized. Fans of this organization show up to games in redface and perpetuate stereotypes of Native Americans because that is the image their logo portrayed. The owner Paul Dolan said, “we do have empathy for those who take issue with it,’ (…) ‘We have minimized the use of it and we’ll continue to do what we think is appropriate.’” Dolan still did make the statement that the logo is a “part of our history and legacy. ”2 Knowing this and that the “home cap with the Wahoo logo was the top seller last year, Cleveland.com reports” 2 fast forward to baseball post season this year October.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the years society has become more and more sensitive to certain topics regarding feelings and emotions. The smallest action or word can trigger a person to become offended or get angry about a topic or event. One such topic is the use of Native American mascots throughout different school, universities and professional sports teams. There are two sides for this argument that most people stand on, they are either all for or all against the use of such mascots. The use of Native American mascots gives off a sense of pride and honor to those who represent the mascot by making them feel a part of something important, retains the heritage of the tribe in that community, and shows values such as leadership and bravery that many Native…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is when they chose the name Redskins. There is a lot of controversy as to whether or not they should change their name or keep it the same. There is nothing wrong with the name, and they should not change it. This is a football team, not anything huge like the office where we make and pass laws in. The main reason they shouldn’t change their name is because it is a legacy, t would be a definite financial change, it is honoring the natives.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Washington redskins has been a national football team since 1932. "Redskins" is a a name used originally by native Americans, and also approved by local natives. I believe the redskins name shouldn't be changed because the name gives pride and honor to the redskins tribe. Charles Krauthammer states how years ago, the word "retarded" was simply a word meaning idiotic, but was made into a derogatory term used against the disabled. So the issue is not the team name itself but the ability to change the name.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article “Indian Mascots-You’re Out” by Jack Shakley, was published in the Los Angeles Times in August 2011. The author argues the issues of sport teams having Native American names. The author wrote the article due to more and more Native Americans protesting at stadiums. With the article being divided into four sections. It was pretty straight forward.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fans that have been supporting a team name for years would feel different about the change and not support the team’s new name. If a team has had its name for years there is no reason it should be changed. An example of a professional team with controversy of its name today would be the Washington Redskins. People of the Indian American race are arguing that the name Redskins is racist and dishonoring, but from a fans standpoint the team name is honoring the Redskins “The point was that the Redskins owner at the time obviously believed that Lone Star Dietz was a Native American and named the team to honor Native Americans and be motivated by their heritage, Waldron.” Sports teams with a long time history mean more to fans and changing names would take away from that.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    You know, 6th graders,the use of the team names Redskins and how offensive to native americans it is, is very interesting! I know that the name redskins can and is very offensive to native americans. I also know that some states, like california, are trying to and have already banned the name redskins for teams and high schools and things like that. The washington redskins are in court trying to keep the team name and not have to think about different names. Also the Washington Redskins are trying to keep their name because it has been that threw out the whole Washington’s franchise.…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Washington Redskins team owner Daniel Snyder has been standing his ground over the controversy of the teams’ name, very firmly standing by his belief that the name is not disrespectful but is a term of honor. Standing with Snyder on the issue is NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, who agrees whole heartedly that the name is meant to honor not disrespect the Native American people. Snyder and other supporters of the team do not feel they are being disrespectful to the Native Americans because they are not using the word is a derogatory manner. They are not encouraging violence against the Natives or anyone else, and the use of the word represents much more to the fans than a racial slur. Snyder also reminded everyone that the team was named after its very first head coach, who was Native American-…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article, The real history of Native American team names Erik Brady, Director of the National Museum of the American Indian: Do Native American mascots honor or offend? Brady believes that it is offensive stating that, “ … American Indian team names simply did not and could not connote respect in the age when they emerged.” Therefore, during this time period, there was a stigma against Natives and he believes the name fits that stigma. No other race was respected as much as another during this time period, many races were discriminated against and ridiculed. Being that this was an issue around this time how does the name “Redskins” not be seen as offensive?…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The name Indians and Redskins are a racist terms. The definition of Redskins by the Oxford Dictionary states “offensive, dated,…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Imagine having your identity being mocked and disrespected on TV daily. You probably wouldn’t be too happy. This is a constant injustice that Native Americans have had to deal with since the beginning of sports. Different variations of Native American imagery have been used as mascots for sports teams of all types and of all levels. There are countless high school, college, and professional athletic teams that label themselves as the Indians or have mascots that are known as Indians.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Get over it” (King 64). King concedes that it is fair for fans to get attached, as they recognize that team and have fond memories practicing the rituals and traditions associated with the team name; but King also pinpoints that post-Civil Rights era America generates this feeling that racism is not a problem anymore, simply an unwarranted feeling at best. While expressing minimal sympathy to Redskins fans, King still makes it very clear that the harms associated with Native American mascots certainly outweigh the fan’s sense of connection. The core of King’s reasoning for this opinion centers around the fact that while racist practices have been in place for some time, a traditions longevity does not make it any less racist, yet rather opens the door for more ignorant decisions. King personifies this by recounting the former president of the National Congress of American Indians experience a Redskins game, where people started pulling her hair and calling her a redskin, leaving her to feel…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many Redskins fans will argue that the name is, in fact, not racist because it is part of their culture too and that Native Americans shouldn’t be offended because it’s just a name, they shouldn’t take it too seriously. In fact, one Redskins fan featured in the video had stated “Do you know any Native Americans? Am I not a Native American? Was I not born in this country?” This perfectly demonstrates how whiteness allows white people to see other races as if we are all on the same playing field and then, when people of color disagree, gives white people the privilege to silence them as well.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The announcement discharged by supervisor expressed: " The Oregonian will immediately discontinue using sports teams’ names and nicknames that many Americans feel are offensive to members of racial, religious, or ethnic groups. Initially, this will include references to Redskins, Redmen, Indians, and Braves”" (Jensen, 1994, p. 18). As indicated by Jensen (1994), the announcement keeps on expressing that the daily paper may drop different names on the off chance that they are too considered hostile. The editorial manager composed the purpose behind the approach was " “the belief that these names tend to perpetuate stereotypes that damage the dignity and self-respect of many people in our society" (p. 18). As indicated by Hofmann (2005), in 1993 the…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays