I replace having intimate relationships with having quick relationships, meaning that I can get close to anyone that I find to be a good person and share my thoughts and ideas with them. I am constantly an open book sharing my experiences with anyone who will listen. I do have many intimate relationships with people that I care about but it was never something that I needed to survive. I could be alone and be emotionally sufficient. People ask me questions such as how I could eat lunch by myself and I just wonder why not? I enjoy my time alone but I also enjoy the company of people, it’s just not a …show more content…
For me Pragma and Eros love styles were the most evident of the six possible love styles. The easiest way to explain having a pragma love style is that love is based on a shopping list the more you qualify for the more likely the person will be interested in you (T. Mendenhall what is intimacy lecture, 1/28/2016). Having a pragma love style to me means exactly that. First, the person I am interested in must be of a similar background as me mainly in a religious context. We must be of the same faith. The second thing is that I must find this man to be able to handle a family financially. Realistically speaking if I end up marrying this person I would love to have kids and while I stay at home and raise the children I want my family to live a comfortable life. I don’t want to be the main source of income for my family. I would love it if both of us could provide for the family in a way that if one of us was not able to do it the other would provide enough for our family. The third thing is he must be attractive. This is a brief overview of what my love style means in my world. I cannot really look at everyone as a possible partner. They must pass the list in order for me to consider if I could be in a serious relationship with this