Those reason could be skills, talents, compensating differences, and or discrimination. It is all depends on the job. In term of different types of worker, each will be affected in their own way when the minimum wage is increase. For skilled and semi-skilled worker, they are similar, they are non-affected group because companies and firms are most likely to keep workers that are that are most beneficial to them. They does not need to be train and that help the firms to save times and that time will be use to produce more products. As for unskilled workers, they are most likely will be laid off because they are not beneficial to the firms. Since the minimum wage increases, firms are looking for an alternative to save money and that lead them to turn to machinery. In a bulletin by Joseph J. Sabia, associate professor of economics at San Diego State University, wrote for Cato Institute, he states that many firms respond to to the increase in minimum wages by replacing low-skilled labor with machinery (Sabia, 2014). Firms will laid off their unskilled workers and replace them with machinery that can produce double the amount a regular worker can produce in the same amount of time. Furthermore, ethnicity, race, and gender are also an important factors that determine the positions and or wages of that worker. In the article, “Issues and Tissues,” by Nicholas Schultheis, his data shows that the average income Caucasian is $67,175, Hispanic was $40,007 and African-American was $39,760 (Schultheis, 2014). Based on the data, the gap between Caucasian and African-American is excessive with the difference of $27415. Not to mention, most of the difficult jobs are done by the minorities. In different cities and different states, the increase in minimum wage can affect them differently. According to the article by James Sherk, “Raising Minimum Starting Wages to $15 per Hour Would Eliminate Seven Million Jobs”, he believes that a $15 minimum wage will affect states with lower cost of living, South Dakota, Arkansas, Mississippi, or Alabama, than states with higher cost of living, New york, Hawaii and California
Those reason could be skills, talents, compensating differences, and or discrimination. It is all depends on the job. In term of different types of worker, each will be affected in their own way when the minimum wage is increase. For skilled and semi-skilled worker, they are similar, they are non-affected group because companies and firms are most likely to keep workers that are that are most beneficial to them. They does not need to be train and that help the firms to save times and that time will be use to produce more products. As for unskilled workers, they are most likely will be laid off because they are not beneficial to the firms. Since the minimum wage increases, firms are looking for an alternative to save money and that lead them to turn to machinery. In a bulletin by Joseph J. Sabia, associate professor of economics at San Diego State University, wrote for Cato Institute, he states that many firms respond to to the increase in minimum wages by replacing low-skilled labor with machinery (Sabia, 2014). Firms will laid off their unskilled workers and replace them with machinery that can produce double the amount a regular worker can produce in the same amount of time. Furthermore, ethnicity, race, and gender are also an important factors that determine the positions and or wages of that worker. In the article, “Issues and Tissues,” by Nicholas Schultheis, his data shows that the average income Caucasian is $67,175, Hispanic was $40,007 and African-American was $39,760 (Schultheis, 2014). Based on the data, the gap between Caucasian and African-American is excessive with the difference of $27415. Not to mention, most of the difficult jobs are done by the minorities. In different cities and different states, the increase in minimum wage can affect them differently. According to the article by James Sherk, “Raising Minimum Starting Wages to $15 per Hour Would Eliminate Seven Million Jobs”, he believes that a $15 minimum wage will affect states with lower cost of living, South Dakota, Arkansas, Mississippi, or Alabama, than states with higher cost of living, New york, Hawaii and California