R V Perry Case

Improved Essays
After participating in and reviewing the Q.B trial R v. Perry & Manitoba in regards to the role of the investigator, and the physical evidence that was implemented in the trial, four individual pieces of physical evidence were introduced to the court by the investigator (cite). These four pieces of evidence consist of, a black wallet that was found on Matlock Manitoba, a time X watch found on Mason Perry, and a knife and a replica firearm found in a dumpster, in the back ally where Mason Perry and Matlock Manitoba were arrested. In relation to the introduction of evidence, the wallet, and Time X watch that supposedly belonged to Monty Hall was first introduced into court by the Crown during the testimony of Monty Hall, stating that his black wallet and Time X watch was stolen from him during the robbery. Additionally, they were shown to Hall asking how both compared to the ones that were stolen, then entered them into court as exhibit one and two. The physical evidence was then brought up once again when Constable York started his testimony, adding that Manitoba was in possession of the wallet and Perry of the Time X watch when found hiding in a bush within the back ally. The Crown then showed the exhibits to Constable York …show more content…
Constable York stated, after arresting Manitoba and Perry he went back into the ally where they were found, with Macy his patrol dog where she then indicted the presence of illegal items inside a dumpster. When searched replica firearm and a knife were found inside at the bottom. The two additional pieces of physical evidence were seized and presented into court, were Constable York introduced them within his testimony, and was then shown by the Crown to confirm the evidence. Throughout the whole trial every piece of evidence was accepted into court as an exhibit, and without any objections by the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    R V Loveridge Case Study

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    R v Loveridge 2013 NSWSC Thomas Kelly was murdered in Kings Cross in a one punch attack. Brief background information On 7th of July 2012 while Thomas Kelly was having a night out with his girlfriend, Loveridge found him and punched Thomas head without warning. That punch hit near the nose area, which forced Thomas to fall backward onto the pavement. Loveridge and Thomas were unknown to each other, and the attack was random and unplanned.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Officer Nighthorse acted in this case just as any officer should have. When he received the call to the Qwiki Mart, he rushed over and received descriptions of the burglar from both the victim and the clerk. After finding Jesse Caufield, a teen who matched the description of the robber, he also discovered the victim’s wallet and a wet Blazers hat in Jesse’s possession. These two pieces of evidence further suggested Jesse Caufield as the thief. The officer did his job by handcuffing the teen.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Gonzales Case Study

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    R v. Gonzales refers to a criminal case of a triple parricide by twenty year old Australian BOS: 28744455 Sef Gonzales which occurred on the 10th of July 2001. Sef’s motives for killing his father Teddy, Mother Mary Loiva and sister Clodine derived from his parent’s unattainable high expectations of him and his desire to financially benefit from their death. Having premeditated his crime, Sef entered Clodine’s room at 4pm armed with two kitchen knifes and a baseball bat and killed her. The cause of her death was the combined effect of the compression of her neck, the blunt force injuries and abdominal stab wounds. Sef’s mother arrived home an hour later and was ambushed in the living room by Sef, stabbing her multiple times, severing her windpipe.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Mabior Case Summary

    • 3451 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Facts of the Case On October 5, 2012, the case of R v. Mabior was taken to the Supreme Court of Canada; her Majesty the Queen is the appellant, and Clato Lual Mabior, the respondent. As well, nonparties known as the interveners are of grave importance to this imperative matter. There were a total of twelve interveners, including: Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network and HIV & AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario, just to name a few (see Appendix A for full list).…

    • 3451 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Appellant V Luis Ortiz

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    requirements of Miranda or whether the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his rights”. (wicourts.gov) STATE of Iowa, Appellant, v. Luis Fernando ORTIZ, Appellee, This case was filed in the Supreme Court of Iowa and was decided in 2009. On July 15, 2006, a woman called the Sioux City Police Department to report that Luis Ortiz, who she hired to do remodeling work in her house, “had forced her seven-year-old daughter to touch his penis”. After a brief meeting with Ortiz Detective Bertrand asked ortiz is he was willing to go to the police station with him for an interview. Once both arrived to the police station Detective Bertrand and Salvador Sanchez, a Sioux City officer, acting as translator, handed Ortiz a Voluntary Waiver of Rights…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case, Brady v. Maryland 373 U.S. 83, Certiorari was granted to a decision of the Court of Appeals of Maryland to consider whether petitioner was denied a federal right when the appeals court restricted its grant of a new murder trial to the question of punishment, leaving the determination of guilt undisturbed. The appeals court granted a retrial after holding that suppression of evidence by the state violated petitioner's rights under the Due Process Clause, U.S. Constitutional Amendment XIV (Law School Case Briefs, 2013). Furthermore, there was a judgement that had granted the petitioner a new murder trial that was solely based on the issue of his punishment. Since the petitioner was convicted of murder and then sentenced to death in his first trail with the Maryland Court, the petitioner was then informed that the Maryland Courts had withheld a statement that indicated that another individual had admitted that exact homicide. What the Supreme Court had concluded from this case was that, because of the suppression of the evidence was in favorable to an accused upon the request that violated the Due Process Clause required the court to a…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    3. First Amendment: Van Orden v. Perry case is about Orden suing Texas about a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of the state capital building. The question is does a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of a state capitol building violate the First Amendment’s establishment clause. The decision was it does not.…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    MILLERSBURG —Following a series of actions crafted to mimic the original intent of the court, a former Millersburg man on Tuesday was sentenced to time served, and released from prison, for admittedly making and possessing meth in the vicinity of a school and juveniles in 2010. For the second time in a month, Delane A. Goodwin, 43, who has been serving his sentence at Richland Correctional Institution, sat in Common Pleas Court Judge Robert Rinfret’s courtroom. First returned to the court in May for a judicial release hearing, Goodwin on Tuesday withdrew his initial guilty plea to felony charges of illegal assembly of chemicals to manufacture methamphetamine and child endangering. He immediately pleaded guilty to felony counts of assembly and possession of meth, as well as a reduced count of child endangering, and Rinfret adopted a joint…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The actuality of the case of State v. Stewart consist of a variety of mental, physical and emotional abuse in which Peggy Stewart had been “pushed” in her own mind to kill her husband to escape from his toxic and cruel behavior. As a result, the facts of the case are a wide variety that contributed to Peggy’s “imminent danger” state of mind when deciding whether her actions were truly self-defense. These include the abuse at hand, physiological trauma that Peggy experienced, and professional opinions about Peggy’s actions. An important factor of the case is Peggy Stewart’s significant abuse by her husband, Mike. Additionally, Mike’s abuse was not only to Peggy; but also to her daughter, Carla.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First there is the testimony of John Norton in which he says he discovered William Robinsons auger within Tshuanahusset’s home, but unfortunately lost the auger in the lake. He says a person named Jones witnessed this auger, but this person is never mentioned again. John Norton is generally a questionable witness. His often uncorroborated claims seem to be extremely prevalent when it comes to trials against Indigenous people. Sue Tas being the only witness to the actual act is also very suspicious, as without evidence it makes this trial a…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    R. V. Hauser Case Study

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages

    While studying the case R. v Hauser, it is clear to see why it is known to be one of the leading constitutional decisions in understanding the workings of Peace, order and good governments in relation to a power struggle of jurisdiction. The whole case surrounds the question on whether the Attorney General, or the Attorney General of Canada should have the power to control the prosecution under the Federal Narcotics Control Act. It is a battle for powers of jurisdiction in regards to the criminal code, and more so the Narcotics Control Act; (NCA), 1961. The Narcotics Act was once Canada’s national drug control statue prior to its repeal in 1996 where the Controlled Drugs and Substance Act took its place. The NCA upheld an international treaty which prohibited the production, and supply of specific drugs; normally narcotics, unless given a licence for specific…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The period of c1886-c1926 saw great changes in investigative methods and thus lead to huge development in policing and how crime was dealt with. Such changes include the creation of the CID, and have shown to have more significance than others. For example, the introduction of forensic science enabled police to convict criminals in multiple cases, such as George Joseph Smith and Dr Crippen, rather than the use of telegram which only showed major significance in the Crippen case. A great flaw in 19th century policing regards the very few investigative methods available to detectives at the time.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the famous cases that occurred in the 19th century is the case of Sherwood v. Walker. This case involved a Mr. Sherwood, the buyer of the cow and Mr. Walker, the cow seller. The issue occurred when both parties create a contract to buy/sell a cow that both parties believed that it a barren cow. A barren cow is a cow that not capable of breeding. Thus, a contract was formed to buy/sell the cow at a portion of the price.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V. Andrews Case Study

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Defences in the Case of R v. Andrews Defences are a denial or justification for criminal behaviour, these are presented by the defence attorneys, in court, to reduce a charge or diminish a charge. In the case of R v. Andrews the accused pleaded guilty and the defence that was used was an alibi. The Defence of an Alibi An alibi is a defence that is raised by the defence counsel and the accused, that demonstrates that the accused was not present at the crime scene at time that the illegal offence occurred. If an alibi is raised, as a defence then the burden of proof is on the crown and not the accused, to demonstrate that the accused was indeed present at the crime scene, when the crime took place.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Going into the field of law enforcement, it is important for officers to prepare and follow correct procedures in order to increase their credibility as an officer, and to aid in a guilty verdict. Evidence to the Court Evidence is a crucial element during trial to increase the credibility, reliability, and validity of an individual’s testimony. In the QB trial video, R v. Perry and Manitoba (2016) a wallet, a Timex watch, a kitchen knife, and a gun replica entered in as physical evidence and can act as direct, or indirect evidence connected to a crime. Usually, this type of evidence is entered through a witness, which in this case was Monty Hall who was the victim.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays