That means that there is less innovation so less new technology, and websites. Those small companies have to pay internet providers money so they can get better speeds meaning those companies put less money into product development. This slows or even stops some companies, wiping out brilliant ideas. These small start-up companies could change the way the internet works making it better, faster, and safer but they cannot because net neutrality is gone. They are still able to use the internet, but their larger competitors have a leg up on them because someone would rather use a faster website than a slow …show more content…
Marvin Ammori, a leading expert on net neutrality who put it into place, in the beginning, said before the announcement of the repeal of net neutrality “We’re about to lose net neutrality and the internet as we know it.” Marvin has been a leading voice working to save net neutrality. He is a prominent first amendment lawyer and thinks that along with those freedoms, should be the freedom of the internet. The internet is very new, and so the constitution needs to catch up to it. Laws like net neutrality were created to govern the internet and keep it free for everyone to use but if you take them away the internet could become a costly, controlled place where it is very hard to