Although the play is intended to be performed as a farce, there was an unfortunate disconnect between the actors and the unity of their performances. While some of the actors were in the realm of farce in terms of the delivery of their text, others, such as the actress who played Anna Petrovna, strayed more towards melodramatic performances. The play as a whole was not representative of Chekhov’s farcical play, as those who strayed towards melodramatic performances brought down the energy and the tension. Upon my reading of the play, I understood Platanov’s internal conflict between his marriage and the insatiable emptiness inside of him. However, in this production, I could not see any reason why Platanov wanted to abandon his wife and child, as it seemed as though he had no clear internal conflict at all; he just seemed bored. Furthermore, it was unclear in performance as to why Anna Petrovna, Sofya, and Sasha were romantically interested in Patronov, as he truly had no redeeming
Although the play is intended to be performed as a farce, there was an unfortunate disconnect between the actors and the unity of their performances. While some of the actors were in the realm of farce in terms of the delivery of their text, others, such as the actress who played Anna Petrovna, strayed more towards melodramatic performances. The play as a whole was not representative of Chekhov’s farcical play, as those who strayed towards melodramatic performances brought down the energy and the tension. Upon my reading of the play, I understood Platanov’s internal conflict between his marriage and the insatiable emptiness inside of him. However, in this production, I could not see any reason why Platanov wanted to abandon his wife and child, as it seemed as though he had no clear internal conflict at all; he just seemed bored. Furthermore, it was unclear in performance as to why Anna Petrovna, Sofya, and Sasha were romantically interested in Patronov, as he truly had no redeeming