Plato's The Republic: The Definition Of Justice

Improved Essays
“Chicago cop cleared in unarmed woman’s shooting death”. Headlines just like this are becoming common in today’s society and the main question that the community asks is “when will justice be served?” Living in a time where the black community keeps getting shot by the police and no consequences occur, we have no choice but to question, what is justice? Similar to the modern society, the one Plato lived in confronted this same question of justice. In this paper I will attempt to explain the view that Plato places before us through Socrates in The Republic as to what is justice and does it “pay” better than injustice in society. Though Plato and I are of two different communities, I still believe that I can agree with the definition of justice that he presents. In The Republic by Plato, tells of a time that Socrates and his community were searching for a clear consensus or definition of justice. Many individuals gave their examples and ideas to the question, but Socrates shot those down because he could sense flaws in each of them. Even though Socrates does not give his own definition of what justice truly is, he does make it clear that he thinks it is something good and desirable by society. That is one of the main points that he attempts to prove through his conversation with the others of his community. He sees justice as a group interest instead of an individuals’ which means that justice would be of a majority decision. Socrates is clearly defending the notion that justice is going to “pay” better than injustice because he believes in a harmonious and good society. …show more content…
He seems to understand that what makes moral sense to others is going to be the more desirable option that the community is going to follow and what the majority deems as “just” is the direction that community is going to agree with overall over something deemed “wrong” or ultimately unjust. Socrates also states that justice trumps injustice because he believes that it is a human virtue, which is the foundation and dispositions to perform good acts. Justice and the well-being of a community is achieved when those individuals of a society are living to fulfill their humanly virtues. As stated before, the majority will take more interest in an issue that is morally just over something that is not. Based on Socrates idea that justice will pay better than injustice is apparent in today’s society. I can say for a fact that the young and black community will agree with the definition that justice is something good which benefits the majority of that community and societal well-being. Most recently, black people are being shot by police officers and no consequences are seen for these unjust actions. I believe that actions like these are being looked at in and around my community as the core definition of injustice. When things happen like this to people who look like just like me, and nothing happens to these officers, I become hurt and angry at the situation that occurred. When injustice happens, people begin to feel the same way as myself and that goes against what society wants and that is to live in a harmonious society. An example like this would prove that injustice is unfair to those of the community who want to live a world where the “right” things happen. In situations like these, the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    After Socrates, the protagonist in Plato’s Republic, refutes a description of justice similar to the traditional poetic view of justice made by a man named Cephalus, Thrasymachus, a well-known sophist, enters into the discussion of justice with Socrates. Thrasymachus asserts, “I proclaim that justice is nothing else than the interest of the stronger” (Plato, Republic I, 338 C). For Thrasymachus, justice is only revealed through the interests of the stronger party. Whatever the stronger party dictates as being good for itself, the stronger party, is what justice is. To further elaborate on his claim, Thrasymachus uses examples of cities governed by different ruling bodies.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This means that those who have the knowledge to understand what is right and wrong also understand justice. Socrates asks Meletus who has knowledge of the laws to which he answers, “these jurymen, Socrates”, Socrates then asks what about the Councilors and the assembly to which Meletus answers yes again. Socrates asks one final question asking if all Athenians improve the youth but he alone corrupts them to which Meletus answers yes. By answering yes Meleteus is asserting that all Athenian citizens except Socrates understand what is right and wrong. This would mean that the Athenian way of life is the life of virtue and therefore the life worth living; Socrates by questioning this way of life is going against what Meletus and his supporters perceive to be virtue.…

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Study Guide, Midterm Exam PH 480 A Fall 2016 Seven potential essay questions—choose any four (4) to complete: 1) What is the Ring of Gyges? Why does Glaucon bring it up in his conversation with Socrates about justice? What does he think we are led to believe by thinking about the story of the ring, and how does Socrates argue against this?…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates examines the definition of virtue once again and proves to Meno that he has not given him a clear definition of virtue because justice is a part of virtue. Socrates states that instead of Meno defining virtue as a whole he is basically acknowledging that anything done with a part of virtue is…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Socrates is trying explain is that justice can be more than the consequence. It is a good that will make you happier let your soul live well. It is a virtue in allowing to better the…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice can have many meanings when put into different perspectives. Throughout Crito, by Plato, Socrates has to determine whether to escape prison or stay. Socrates was initially charged with corrupting the youth and not believing in gods. He argued his case in jury and did not choose the alternate punishment, exile, which could have saved his life. He was then given a death sentence and he was imprisoned until his execution.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    End-Term Assignment. Plato- Socrates must prove that justice is choice worthy because of itself and due to its consequences. Socrates also mentions about Individual Justice but shifts its debate on Political Justice. He describes an ideal good city-Kallipolis.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Definition Of Justice In Plato's Republic

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    Socrates expresses that,“…is it because of the spirited part…that we call a single individual courageous (Plato 99).” It can be found if one has courage in the spirited part. In the state, the soldiers represent courage. They fight and defend for their city.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    His main goal is to show the reader or his audience that it pays to be a just person even if the reward is not instant. In Socrates mind a just man is a philosopher king, who is essentially a smart thinker who does what is best for the community. When everyone follows this social order that Socrates proposes, it is possible for everyone to play their part and this gives way for the leaders to be philosopher kings who are the most intelligent thinkers. This ‘Kaliipolis’ is a city where the rulers crave knowledge, unlike a democracy where the ‘mob’ mentality rules causing the unfit to rule. He explains by stating, “Don’t understand that a little captain must pay attention to all seasons of the year, the sky, the star, to winds, and all that pertains to his craft, if he’s really to be the ruler of the ship” (Plato, 2004,448).…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To prove Justice is best and not a compromise, Socrates must find a definition of Justice that nobody has ever heard…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates examines the human nature, or the characteristics of just man and unjust man. A just man would always chooses justice and guide others to justice. Whereas an unjust man guides himself and others with his lawless desires, and proceed with unjust actions. Hence, just man lives happy life because he is wisdom and good will; the unjust man live a miserable life because of his ignorance and evil…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His was that Justice means that you must help your friends and harm your enemies. To this Socrates tells of incoherence in his idea of harm through Justice. Your friend may be as bad or even worse than your enemy. Socrates rebuttal is in accordance to my thesis. Because the main western religion, God puts all people, regardless of race, gender, and religion on the same pedastol.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the book Plato’s Republic, the argument is a question of what justice is. Justice is the question that all characters in the book are trying to explain for the purpose of developing in their own opinion an ideal city. Socrates tries to form this perfect city where everyone will follow the rules implemented. While building the city everything is done in a matter to see the good or bad of each individual. So many rules each have to follow to form a just city that is not made of good people overall but the city will implement rules where only the best can rule.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Book I of Plato’s, the Republic, the question is asked of what justice truly is. After Socrates has a long discussion, poking holes in the argument that justice is giving a man what he is owed, Thrasymachus bursts forward and offers a definition of justice that is contradictory in itself. Whereas I often presume justice to be what is equal and good, Thrasymachus argues that injustice is actually a virtue and justice, a vice, as injustice seems to benefit the doer as long as he or she goes unpunished. This mindset is a common one in the world, even though not everyone would admit to it. From corrupt politicians stealing money to high school students cheating on a math test, humans have always had the tenacity to cheat and steal.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Republic, Plato discusses and relates the three topics that are central to one lives, education, justice, and happiness. Through his definitions of these three topics, he considers how a society can achieve the proper education, justice, and happiness leading to his understanding of human nature. Plato addresses the close relation between being just and happy to the education received in society. The relationship between education, justice, and happiness depends on Plato’s understanding of these topics. Specifically with the relations of justice and happiness, the relationship is just as much dependent on the true sense of the idea as it is with Socrates rejection of the false claims.…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics