Nuclear Energy In Europe

Improved Essays
Nuclear Energy not a Solution for the Energy crisis in Europe Energy is an important part of our daily lives helping citizens to achieve a comfortable lifestyle through electricity. However, resources like oil and non-renewable resources which generates the majority of current energy are running out and that the world needs alternative energy in order to solve the increasing demand. Nuclear energy is one possible energy alternative which can be useful for the world. European countries are one of the biggest users of nuclear energy with France as the leader of nuclear energy in the world as it supplied around 72% of the country’s electricity (as cited in World Nuclear report (2015 p160)). Even though some countries in Europe still believe …show more content…
According to Shrader-Frechette (2011 p80), nuclear power plants can only operate for an average of 70% of the time due to maintenance schedule and breakdowns. Regular maintenance needs and breakdowns implies that nuclear energy cannot generate the full capacity, which results in the addition of cost for the users. Nuclear energy also cannot compete with other forms of renewable energy. Andrianov et al (2015 p1004) write that nuclear energy is not competitive enough with other energy sources in terms of efficiency such that its cost exceeds its benefits for the users. The benefits of nuclear energy such as low carbon emissions do not balance with the cost. Due to a lack of belief in nuclear energy, there are also increasing trend of the decommissioning of nuclear power plants in Europe before the end of its useful life and the abandonment of construction of nuclear plants which might suggest its poor prospects. For example, in Germany, there have been 3 demolition of its nuclear power plants and a suspension of service for 7 of its 17 nuclear power plants in 2010 (as cited in Franchino (2014 p213)). Although Germany needs the energy produced by these nuclear reactors, risk analysis suggests that these nuclear power plants are actually inefficient and accident-prone. Germany who is led by Angela Merkel – a former nuclear research scientist, even describes that the …show more content…
With a current drop in oil prices, nuclear projects will not be economically feasible and desirable (as cited in World Nuclear Report (2015 p127)). Even though the dip in oil prices will only occur in the short term, improving efficiencies of power plants be a fix to make the current supply of oil and non-renewable resources last longer. According to Feiveson (2009 p68), the world energy outlook states that the generation of energy using coal will improve its efficiencies up to 50% by 2030 which can lengthen the time to use up current reserves of non-renewable resources. Other than non-renewable resources, renewable resources such as wind power are also available for European countries in order to solve their energy crisis. A study conducted in 2009 states that nuclear energy prices for electricity is $0.21/kWh, while wind power energy and solar photovoltaic panels can cost only

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Has the world grown so dependent upon nuclear power energy that it ignores the price tag? Power reaped from nuclear energy by heating and pressuring water is known as nuclear power. Controversies surrounding nuclear power come in various forms, however, the financial aspect is grand. In their recent work, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), a nonprofit organization composed of numerous scientists, discovered actual costs of implementing nuclear power as an energy source. Within the article Is Nuclear Power Our Energy Future, Or in a Death Spiral?, author Dave Levitan paraphrases UCS's findings as, "the price tag for a new nuclear power plant jumped from between US$2 billion and US$4 billion in 2002 all the way [to] US$9 billion in 2008.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One statistic that stands out in the article is: “at the end of 2007 the world had 439 operating nuclear reactors producing 372 gigawatts of electricity” (Stieglitz and Docksai 20). This article provides readers with enough information in regards to nuclear power…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, nuclear energy is extremely expensive, which can ultimately drain a nation's resources without providing any benefits. This is evident as the Office of Nuclear Energy found that nuclear power plant construction contains “high capital costs, licensing and regulatory approvals, coupled with long lead times and construction delays” (Advantages). In other words, the substantial financial investment required for nuclear energy projects often outweighs the potential benefits, leading to significant economic strain without necessarily delivering the expected returns. This highlights the inherent challenges associated with nuclear energy, which reveals it as a modern day Frankenstein, as the ambitious pursuit of power and progress may come at a devastating cost to society. Thus, while nuclear energy may offer potential solutions to energy needs, its economic burdens warrant careful consideration before widespread…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The article “Why I Still Support Nuclear Power, Even After Fukushima” by William Tucker portrays that all energy technologies have risks and that the world needs to use nuclear technology to help maintain the standard of living. For example, the natural gas explosion in Cleveland, the coal mining in china, and the hydroelectric dam collapse in Japan are all examples of technology accidents. Tucker implies that nuclear power does have some risks but it is still one of the best sources of energy. Uranium fuel rods cam sit in a reactor core for up to five years and power a city close to the size of San Francisco. Nuclear reactors can last quite a long time before they need to be refilled and can supply to a big chunk of the world with very little…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Australia has been engage using energy future or as it call, nuclear power and signed a contract around 1951s and in fact, Australia start creating uranium not as much of 2 grams between 1906 till 1932 Australia has exported their production in 1962s After that, large and high grade of uranium has been discovering around Australia, during the same era, the safety has been forcing to take in action to minimise the nuclear producing. However, uranium oxide has been to start move up and carbon an emission has been getting high in the air, nuclear power might be the solution to reduce this amount of pollutions. According to studies that mad, Australia has around 25% of the world’s resources of economic uranium.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear power is one of the cheapest forms of energy compared to other sources such as oil and coal. According to studies done by professor Nolan E, Hertel, professor of Nuclear and Radiological Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology, the cost of producing nuclear energy as of 2007 was 1.7 cents per kilowatt hour compared to 2.4 cents for coal, 6.7 cents for natural gas, and 10.2 cents for oil. However does this affordability come at a cost? According to Max Schulz at the center for Energy Policy and the Environment at the Manhattan Institute, there has not been a single accident or fatality involving exposure or harm at a nuclear power plant since the start of their operations in the United States (MI). When compared to the average of 200 accidental deaths per year at coal and natural gas powered plants, not including respiratory issues, its record is impeccable (Lehr).…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When the term Nuclear Power or Nuclear Energy is used usually the first thing that comes to mind for most people are war, bombs, deformed humans, and destruction. In fact, these are four things that least occur in the nuclear field. Yes, war, bombs, and what not are used, but also most of all the nuclear energy used in today’s society comes in the form of production of electricity. Therefore, we do get something good out of it.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, he is inaccurate because in “The Fatal Flaws of Nuclear Power”, it discusses about the additional expenses of nuclear power since “Other aspects of nuclear power, such as the pollution from uranium mining, risks from nuclear weapons proliferation, dangers of reactor accidents, and the legacy of radioactive waste, are further hidden costs.” This demonstrates that constructing a nuclear reactor is highly priced, along with numerous other requirements that necessitate funds. Additionally, nuclear power generates harmful risks towards humans. Based on…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Energy Proposal

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages

    • My topic is nuclear energy and my proposal is that the Unites States should utilize nuclear energy as the nation’s main power source. My research goals include finding statistics of refueling cycles and the reliability of nuclear, coal and gas power plants. In addition, I plan on finding what nuclear energy is and how it is produced. Furthermore, I need to understand the cost of building and running nuclear, coal and gas plants annually.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regardless of the various definitions of renewable energy, nuclear energy meets every reasonable criterion for sustainability, which is the primary concern of countries. The United States should use nuclear energy for three primary reasons: first, it produces more cost effective energy than any other non-renewable resource. Second there is no release of greenhouse gasses which contribute to global warming, and finally nuclear energy is the most reliable source of power in the world today. Nuclear power produces electricity that is less expensive than coal and natural gas while providing more energy for use. The Energy Informative Organization supports this claim when the author states, “Generating electricity in nuclear reactors is cheaper…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear Pros And Cons

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nuclear power is used worldwide, but is put under the question as to if it is more beneficial than harmful. Nuclear power is the process of atomic reactions that produce a form of energy, in the United States providing about twenty percent of the country 's electricity. The controversy that pertains nuclear power use has been gradually escalating because some may believe that nuclear power plants are more harmful than safe and some may disagree of the matter. Nuclear power is questionable due to the controversy that revolve around concerns such as; safety, nuclear power plant accidents, radioactive waste, and nuclear proliferation. Nuclear power has been around with the use of nuclear power plants since the late nineteen hundreds.…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear Energy Controversy

    • 1506 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In 1973, the United States canceled their order for reactors due to economic reasons. The costs of energy was rising and inflation which led to the demand for global electricity to decrease. The United States in 1978 started to transition from the energy market to the natural gas market. As the people started to vote against nuclear power, it was not until the 1990s that the energy market’s supply and demand began to lag in Western Countries. The introduction of nuclear power to the present time has developed many problems throughout its seventh years of being available to the world.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thesis: Our energy comes predominantly from fossil fuels because of it’s supposed inexpensiveness. However, the cost of fossil fuels in terms of human lives is often ignored. Nuclear power, on the other hand, is a much safer alternative because it results in fewer deaths per unit of energy produced than coal and natural gas. By comparing their outputs in terms of energy produced per unit of fuel consumed, and comparing that with the amount of byproducts produced as well as the amount of deaths associated with both energy sources we can analyse their relative harmfulness.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear Energy Cost Essay

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What Could It Cost?). With that in mind, it’s not wise or ultimately profitable for the government to continue investing in nuclear power as a viable energy source. Another cost related to nuclear energy is uranium importation. PSR wrote that “assertions that nuclear power can lead us to energy independence are incorrect.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of nuclear power has been under debate for many years; with issues such as environmental impact, safety, cost, waste management, and efficiency, the cons clearly outweigh the pros. Nuclear power plants have been supplying electricity to the population for nearly 60 years, but all things must come to an end as better options emerge and humanity develops as a species. It 's only natural for things to become outdated, or be replaced by better options as they become available. Nuclear power is a source of energy, created through a reaction when a uranium atom is split, releasing heat that is used to produce electricity. It was initially used as an alternative to coal, as coal-burning facilities were becoming a hazard to the environment.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays