Nuclear Energy Persuasive Essay

Improved Essays
Hello Mr. Wolfe, I have written to you in a genu matter. The matter of the usage of nuclear energy in our state should be stopped. I understand nuclear power is currently playing a large role in our environment. However, we should stop using nuclear power plants for many reasons. Some of the reasons include pollution for aquatic life and their high cost. Those are just the tip of the iceberg Mr. Wolfe, and as your advisor, I’m only trying to help our state.

Mr. Wolfe, there are copious amounts of reasons of getting rid of nuclear energy in our state that I think that you should listen to. One reason that we shouldn’t be using nuclear energy is because of radioactive waste which is produced from the use of nuclear energy. Once
…show more content…
Nuclear energy, and the use of it, has been used for weapons and items to destroy the Earth, rather than making the world a better place to live in. Using nuclear energy involves strict protocol and huge amounts of responsibility to avoid any major accidents that would devastate the area surrounding the site of the accident. Power plants are common targets for militant and terrorist organizations, and the general security of the compound has always been at risk and of high concern. One mess up from security and someone could take advantage of the mistake, and once they take advantage of the mistake, the fate of the world, depending on the size and destruction rate of the given nuclear components, could be in their hands. Nevertheless, there are more consequences in the pursuit of nuclear energy. In the light of one fault in using nuclear energy is that it impacts aquatic life. A result of radioactive waste, which nuclear power plants create, helps to cause eutrophication. Eutrophication can affect plant life in the water for the reason that minerals could cause algae to grow, which would block sunlight from the reach of the plants at the bottom of the water. Coupled with the impact on aquatic life, nuclear power plants also have a tremendous impact on human life as well. On August 6, 1945, the Hiroshima and Nagasaki were obliterated by nuclear bombs. For this very catastrophe, five decades after the bombing, children are still being born with the aftereffects of the booms from their family trees. Currently, there is no cure for the affected children and

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Nuclear Question: Should Australia Partake Almost 40% of all enriched uranium begins its half-life in Australia but none of this is being used to generate energy in Australia. This is mostly due to the negative stigma that accompanies nuclear power. The fear of meltdowns, accidents and sabotage has lead the general populace to influence legislation against the use of nuclear power. Their fears, however, are unfounded as nuclear power is profitable, efficient and above all safe.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reader is most aware of the downfalls of nuclear power because that is what the media conveys to the public. The Three Mile Island incident is brought up more than once in this article and most people are familiar with this because it made worldwide news in 1979. A small portion of the text is a review, but most of it is new information. One piece of information that caught my eye was the portion that discussed the Obama administration: “President Obama eliminated funding… for the state-of-the-art nuclear waste storage facility at Yucca Mountain, Nevada” (Stieglitz and Docksai 17). Nearly all of the statistics were new information.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although critics may claim that nuclear energy does not emit carbon dioxide into the environment, it is clear that it is an example of a modern day Frankenstein as it can ultimately have catastrophic effects on humanity due to nuclear waste, radiation, and cost. While people may argue that nuclear energy is a clean energy source, it produces nuclear waste, which is potentially even worse than carbon emissions in the long run. This is evident as the Department of Energy determined that “more than 85,000 metric tons” of waste is being stored across the country (Nuclear). In other words, while nuclear energy does not produce carbon dioxide, it still creates potentially devastating byproducts. However, unlike carbon dioxide, people have to actively maintain and store nuclear waste as it is extremely dangerous.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The documentary that was first shown in 2013 and is approximately 83 minutes long, does an excellent job of creating a debate about the perception of nuclear energy in challenging global climate change during the 21st century. This documentary film's main argument is that nuclear power, yet contradicted by many environmentalists, is a relatively safe and harmless source of energy if compared to other energy sources and can counteract…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When the term Nuclear Power or Nuclear Energy is used usually the first thing that comes to mind for most people are war, bombs, deformed humans, and destruction. In fact, these are four things that least occur in the nuclear field. Yes, war, bombs, and what not are used, but also most of all the nuclear energy used in today’s society comes in the form of production of electricity. Therefore, we do get something good out of it.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It's easy to think that nuclear power plants are a great benefit for the united states because it will has smaller carbon footprints, it will help with air pollution however, if a nuclear accident were to happen air pollution wouldn't be the problem, radiation would be the problem. This would mean that people would not be able to survive in that area and would need to evacuate. This is worse than any other problem. To wrap it all up nuclear power is not reliable and shouldn’t be passed in the united states because it takes a long time, nuclear accidents , and it attracts…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Saying “No” to Nuclear Power As of 2003, 49,000 metric tons of nuclear waste has been produced in the United States alone. Every day, more and more of this incredibly dangerous substance is released into our planet’s soil. Nuclear power seems like a good idea on the surface, but obviously, it is not the answer. Nuclear power is too dangerous, too expensive, and unable to be contained, therefore it should not be the world’s primary source of energy.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today I am going to talk about the topic of nuclear power. A local Nuclear Power Plant has come up with the idea to build a power plant in the town of Enola, PA. As the governor of Harrisburg, I am persuaded you to allow this to happen. There are three reasons you should allow this to happen. One reason is that it doesn’t cause pollution.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This contrasts to coal fired units which emit copious amounts of substances that aren’t immediately deadly, and didn’t require immediate attention when they were first created thus leading to the environmental state we’re currently in. even though it’s true that nuclear fallout can be a serious problem, many reactors have several containment precautions. Even the incident at Three Mile Island which scared a nation into halting production of nuclear energy was mostly contained, and there have been no identifiable negative health effects [9]. Even considering the amount of current deaths because of both nuclear and fossil fuels, studies show that the amount of energy being produced by nuclear power instead of fossil fuels has actually saved tens of thousands of lives. The study estimated that for each terawatt hour of electricity produced, an average of 26.67 lives are lost whereas a terawatt hour of nuclear electricity kills an average of 0.074 people (stats relevant for Europe)…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reason the U.S. death toll is so low for nuclear is our strong Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).” The statistic given in the article shows that has only 90 deaths per trillion kilowatt hour (deaths/trillionkWhr) for nuclear globally, and 0.1 deaths/trillionkWhr in the United States (Conca). The numbers show that nuclear is actually in fact the safest form of energy there is. The only reason for the nuclear uneasiness is because of a few famous…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Also nuclear radioactivity has a disastrous effect on aquatic life if neglected. “Reports say that radioactive wastes take almost 10,000 years to get back to the original form”(Risks) and radioactivity has a heightened effect on aquatic animals. Along with the 60 people killed in the Chernobyl disaster, there is still an estimated death toll of 4,000-25,000 latent cancer deaths. This grueling number is a testament to how potentially dangerous a nuclear power plant can become if ignored. Because of these reasons, countries around the world have strayed from constructing new nuclear…

    • 1358 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Today our world is powered by many new sources like wind using the air currents, solar harvesting the sunlight, or geothermal manipulating the water, and many more as well. Even though we have all these power sources most of them are location oriented so most of our energy is created by two sources fossil fuels (coal, natural gas, and petroleum) and nuclear. Coal and natural gas make up most of our energy, but why am I telling you this it’s because coal energy is a giant now but it is slowly ruining our environment. That’s why the future of our energy should be nuclear.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear Energy Cost Essay

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nuclear power comprises 20% of the world’s energy production. No other form of energy production runs the risk of being taken over by terrorists, or exploding and killing millions of people within a 50 mile radius (Nuclear Power Plants). The United States has 121 government sanctioned nuclear energy power plants in its borders that each cost extreme amounts to build and run. With the U.S. being nearly twenty trillion dollars in debt, it would be wise to stop all further development of nuclear energy.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of nuclear power has been under debate for many years; with issues such as environmental impact, safety, cost, waste management, and efficiency, the cons clearly outweigh the pros. Nuclear power plants have been supplying electricity to the population for nearly 60 years, but all things must come to an end as better options emerge and humanity develops as a species. It 's only natural for things to become outdated, or be replaced by better options as they become available. Nuclear power is a source of energy, created through a reaction when a uranium atom is split, releasing heat that is used to produce electricity. It was initially used as an alternative to coal, as coal-burning facilities were becoming a hazard to the environment.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also there was a copious amount of radiation exposure in the air and water supply. Despite the various controversial issues revolving around nuclear energy, the benefits are too big to pass up. In order to sustain a growing population, the United States will soon require large sums of electricity that only nuclear resources can provide. Although it is true that nuclear power plants come with possible negative effects, technological advances continue to diminish these problems. In other words, nuclear power is continuing to become more reliable and it is all uphill from here.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays