NAFTA Issues

Improved Essays
The trade agreement between Canada, the United States and Mexico has been established in 1994 (NAFTA). The intention of the trade agreement is to eliminate tariffs and trade barriers between the three countries. After 24 years, the conditions of the trade agreement are on the table to in hopes modernize the deal. According to Jean-Francois Perrault, chief economist at Scotiabank, says that updating NAFTA was part of Trump’s election strategy (Abedi). Trump called NAFTA the “worst trade deal” in the history during a pre-election debate with Democratic party candidate Hillary Clinton (Knightley et.al.). He promised that the revised deal will put “America first”. Trump stated that the current terms is responsible for the country’s decline in manufacturing …show more content…
However, the Trudeau government has signaled that they intend to keep it (Joseph). Trump also wants to end the dispute resolution panel so that it does not restrict the ability of the United States to apply measures in future investigations (Bown). These arbitration panels determine whether a NAFTA country treated their overseas investments unfairly. The Trump administration claims that it weakens the sovereignty of United States’ courts. For example, the United States Commerce Department has accused western Canadian provinces of subsidizing their lumber exports. That allows them to sell low-cost lumber into the American market. Although, the resolution panel has ruled in favour of Canada. The Commerce Department has threatened to impose a 20 percent tariff on Canadian lumber imports …show more content…
Lighthizer, the United States Trade Representative, has introduced controversial proposals. They included a sunset clause that would require the renewal of the trade agreement every five years; rules of origin that would toughen the United States requirements for domestic distribution, especially for automobiles, to qualify for zero-tariff treatment; and to put an end to the transnational courts that settle international business disputes (Mufson, et.al.). Wilbur Ross, United States Commerce Secretary, suggested to update the rule of origins. It says that 62 percent of the parts of a car sold in North America must come from one of the three NAFTA countries (Amadeo). Finally, Trump has asked Mexico to end the Maquiladora program. This program allows American companies to set up low-cost manufactory across the border of Mexico to assemble finished products (Amadeo). Then, they export the goods back to the United States. As an outcome, the Maquiladora factories are responsible for the 65 percent of Mexico's exports and employ 30 percent of its workforce (Offshore International). Trump threatened to withdraw from NAFTA if Canada and Mexico rejected to renegotiate his demands. He would also enforce a 35 percent tariff on Mexican imports

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Unfortunately, a beneficial renegotiation seems unlikely under the Trump administration, which has insulted Mexican immigrants and demanded that Mexico pay for the wall. The reality is that no renegotiation of the NAFTA can achieve this administration’s main goal, which is to bring factory jobs back to the U.S. and reduce the merchandise trade deficit with Mexico (“The pitfalls of renegotiating NAFTA, 2017). On the other hand, Eugene Beaulieu, economics professor at the University of Calgary, argues that NAFTA should not be renegotiated. Beaulieu claims that while NAFTA did cause the loss of jobs in some industries, it created jobs in other industries.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a Canadian company gained the right to export Canadian water, American multinationals would have the right to sue under NAFTA’s national treatment clause to help themselves to as much Canadian water as they wanted. During the 1999 world trade organization conference, a congressional delegation from the Great Lakes region and trade representatives from Canada tried to ensure that water exports are prohibited. The Clinton administration resisted the move, contending that treaties currently in place are sufficient. Deputy U.S. Trade Representative Richard Fisher added that bringing the issue before the conference “would risk creating an international issue where none currently exists”. The report states that “although it seems clear that climate change and continued reports of worldwide water shortages will continue to keep discussion of bulk water shipments alive, the cost of such shipments makes it unlikely that there will be serious efforts to take Great Lakes water to foreign markets, and cost will continue to serve as an impediment to bulk shipments from coastal…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some trade policies that the US has is the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). This agreement states that Canada, US, and Mexico have trade agreements that allow for free trade zones and the elimination of trade barriers. Since we do not have trade agreements with other nations, the U.S imposes tariffs and quotas, taxes and restrictions on goods that can leave or enter the country. However, with this agreement, the U.S has duty-free and unlimited access to beef within the countries that are participating in…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the last article, “The Granddaddy of All Canadian-U.S. Trade Disputes is About to Rear Its Ugly Head Again”, Drew Hasselback discusses the recent problems about trade disputes of softwood lumber products between the United States and Canada. The United States and Canada are considered as each other’s largest trading partner today. The dispute has been going on since 1982 and has gone through four iterations (Hasselback, 2014). Because of this trade dispute, Canadian exports of softwood lumber products to the U.S. has shown a case evidence for the dispute settlement mechanism under NAFTA. The main concerns regarding the dispute between Canada and U.S. is due to the disagreement on pricing strategies, economic impacts, and regulations.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The North American Free Trade Agreement gave Canada an image of a successful country. With this agreement, Canada was able to form successful bonds with Mexico and America, especially the U.S. In order to make this three-way agreement, all 3 countries had to be respectful and had to be co-operative to have a successful trade relationship. Although America and Canada have a very strong trade relationship, that's not where it ends, it goes beyond just trade and business. They share the same border and are neighbours which also affects their relationship because they have more time to bond.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the present day president of the USA, Donald Trump, NAFTA is being put on the line of keeping the negotiations going or not. “With America out of NAFTA, experts say, prices on everything from cars to groceries are expected to climb. Tens of thousands of jobs would be at risk as supply chains are torn apart” (Hutchins 27). Canada is so intertwined with the American economy that if the US backs out of NAFTA, Canada’s economy will plummet and jobs will either be lost or at risk. The CUSFTA set the groundwork for NAFTA in the early 1990’s allowing Canada to be a big player for exportations and…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Costs are lowered for farm products, too. NAFTA also help to increased higher wages in several careers in Canada, such as engineering, education and, etc. Moreover, it creates more trade opportunities in Canada and leads to an increase in productivity gradually. However, with the introducing of NAFTA, led to a dramatic amount of jobs lost in manufacturing industries in Canada which include automotive, textile, computer and electrical appliance; for Mexico labor was cheaper.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Trudeau Government

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, Canada generally had better aspects of trade with The United States rather than Mexico. To combat this Justin Trudeau wishes to implement new economic trade policies dealing with international affairs. A few of which include free trade, and green energy commitment. These new economic policies are a large part of the international affairs. In addition, to this Sands states “Improving relations with Mexico could be a way to deepen Canadian relationships throughout Latin America and the Caribbean too, notes the report” (Sands, Christopher).…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    firms to relocate in Mexico although this was the case the loss of this imported growth would likely happen without the North American Trade Agreement. So there is some fault towards the agreement and there is some towards the United States because this lost of jobs would have happened with or without the North American Free Trade Agreement. A number of studies have found that the North American Free Trade Agreement has brought overall economic benefits to the Mexican economy but the benefits were not evenly distributed throughout the country. It help Mexico closed the gaps it had with Canada and the United States and it contributed to Mexico's economic recovery after the 1995 exchange rate crisis. The Political effects of the North American Trade Agreement was that it provided North American businesses with better access to…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There were many different ideas, between the Northern and Southern states. There was a convention, the Philadelphia Convention, where many Framers, which were people who worked in our government, came to discuss the agreements and disagreements that were bothering the government. There were many disagreements between Northern and Southern States. One of the disagreements is about tariffs. Tariffs are a tax on imported goods and products.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He says that Mexico’s leaders have been taking advantage of America by using immigration to get rid of their own crime and poverty. Our taxes have skyrocketed and jobs are becoming harder and harder to find. Crime rates keep going up, and some Mexican’s cross the border just to commit horrible crimes against Americans. Trump claims Mexico is making millions of dollars because of…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 1990’s alone Mexican manufacturing wages fell 21%. Although not all of Mexico's problems are caused by NAFTA, many have a direct link to it. As an example, under NAFTA, about five hundred thousand jobless Mexicans have migrated into the U.S. per year forced to leave their jobs because of competition or poor wages. As a result of the problems NAFTA has caused, 25 percent of the population (about 32 million) lives in poverty, and on top of that one fifth of all Mexican…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    would be unemployed. When Mexico suffered from recession back in the 1980’s the border regions eared enough to stay up to date. As other industries when to bankruptcy, maquiladoras boomed in profits. Maquiladoras ensure that Mexico will be a solid foundation of the global economy. NAFTA, which is the North American Free Trade Agreement contributed to the expansion of the maquiladora industries in the early 1990’s resulting in the increase of maquiladoras job market.…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Multiculturalism In Canada

    • 1037 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The North American Free-Trade Agreement, created in 1994, was a step for Canada towards fostering a better relationship with other North American countries, while also improving the economic prosperity of the country. Although “NAFTA was bold, innovative, risky, and controversial from the start,” the trade agreement paid off for the nations involved. The effect of the trade agreement on Canada’s economy was visible between the 1980s and the 1990s: “exports as a percentage of GDP moved from about 25 percent to 40 percent, and some years even a good deal higher than that.” In the 1980s, before NAFTA was passed, the Canadian government was running a deficit, however, that moved into a surplus after the trade agreement was signed. The increase in these figures shows the positive effects the free trade agreement had on Canada’s economy, allowing it to flourish in solidarity instead of fragment in isolation, establishing Canada’s global image as an economic…

    • 1037 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another information he shared in the article, where he gave an example of NAFTA where he talked about the effect of trade between US and Canada. Merchandise trade levels between Canadian provinces were built-in “home bias”. Although NAFTA helped reduce this ratio of domestic to international trade from 10:1 to 5:1. This shows the nationalism is yet overcome to reach the…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays