Miranda Warnings: Custodial Interrogation

Improved Essays
Upon placing a suspect under arrest and prior to conducting a custodial interrogation in regards to the offense or offenses they have been arrested for, the suspect must be read their Miranda Warnings. The first part of the Miranda Warnings is “you have to right to remain silent”, which means that per the Fifth Amendment, you do not have to answer any interrogational questions in which you are a witness against yourself. The second part of the Miranda Warnings is “anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law”. This warning is advising the suspect that anything they say “can” and “will” be used against them during the adjudication process (Miranda Warning, u.d.). The third part of the Miranda warnings is “you have the right to an attorney, if you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you”. This …show more content…
For those that cannot afford to pay for their own counsel, “a lawyer will be provided without cost” (Hall, 2015, p. 474). Many agencies train their men and women to ensure the suspect understands every Miranda Warning prior to going on to the next one. Some agencies also have the arrestee sign a form that has the Miranda Warnings written on them after they are read to them as well (U.S. Constitution, u.d.). The warnings must be read to a defendant who is in custody and are going to be interrogated (Hall, 2015). The reason why they must be read is because of the Miranda v. Arizona ruling where the Court ruled that these rights are not presumed to be known by the suspect, so they must be advised of them prior to questioning. When I worked the road, I made it part of my arrest procedures to “Mirandize” a person as soon as I placed him or her under arrest. I also ensured that the Miranda Warning was read to the suspect when my in-car camera was recording so that I had audio evidence of me Mirandizing them. I

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Do you understand these rights as they have been read to you?” This is the Miranda warning or more widely known as the Miranda rights. Police are required to read these rights to anyone they arrest, they are required to under Miranda V. Arizona to protect against self-incrimination. Ernesto Arturo Miranda, who raped, kidnapped, murdered and armed robbed was arrested and convicted after an interrogation where he was not informed of his rights. After that Miranda was taken to court and was convicted of rape and kidnapping and sentenced to 20-30 year.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since Miranda v. Arizona (1956) the Supreme Court watered down the protection of suspects during interrogation in several ways. The Miranda warnings weakened when courts decided they were not Fifth Amendment rights (Hemmens, 2014). Miranda warnings weakened when Courts ruled that police violations are inadmissible and does not apply to evidence obtained through Miranda violated interrogations. In addition, the courts ruled that not all parts of the Miranda warnings need to be read to suspects. One of the most damaging Miranda warnings were weakened when courts decided that if a confession was made through an interrogation that violated Miranda rules, the confession is admissible once the suspect Miranda rights were properly read (Hemmens, 2014, p. 28).…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Miranda warning includes what rights we have when we are being arrested or interrogated. Police officers or other law enforcement officers must tell a person their Miranda rights during an arrest. After the warning is given to someone being arrested, the person also has the right to speak to an attorney. These rights became a part of the Fifth and Six amendments that already existed in our U.S. Constitution.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This case helped establish the term “Miranda warning” or “Miranda rights”, which is a right to silence warning given by police to criminal suspects in police custody before they are interrogated. “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford one, one will be provided for you.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    You have a right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you" (" 'Miranda' Rights"). The law enforcement personnel must warn the individual prior to any investigation using the Miranda Warning. The Miranda rights are the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney, which are stated in the Miranda…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His request to speak with his lawyer while being questioned by police was repeatedly denied. The Court held that the denial of Escobedo’s right to counsel contributed to his confession, making it invalid as evidence, emphasizing the importance of protecting the rights of individuals during police questioning (Doc 6). Similarly, in Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court established the famous “Miranda rights,” which require law enforcement officials to inform individuals of their constitutional rights before questioning them in police custody. This case involved Miranda, who confessed to a crime during police interrogation without being informed of his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination. The Court ruled that Miranda’s confession was obtained in violation of his constitutional rights and established the now-familiar Miranda warning to protect individuals’ rights during police interrogation (Doc 7).…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Decision: The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of Miranda. This decision gave rise to what has become known as the Miranda Warning. The government does need to notify arrested individuals of their Fifth Amendment and Sixth amendment constitutional rights, specifically “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Especially if public safety is in jeopardy, no Miranda warnings are required, at least in short term. This was the decision reached in New York v. Quarles (467 U.S. 649 1984). There the court held that that the warnings need not be given if the suspect could have endangered public safety. Let’s look at some of the cases in the timeline of The Evolution of Miranda v Arizona first to me the most important one which this paper is about 1966- Miranda v. Arizona U.S. 436 Any person subjected to custodial interrogation must be advised of his or her Fifth Amendment right to be free from compelled self- incrimination and to have the assistance of counsel present.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Miranda Rights help protect citizens fifth and sixth amendments. The fifth amendment protects citizens from being forced to be witness against himself, while the sixth amendment assures that those arrested have a right to a public and speedy trial (Doc E). Together, the fifth amendment protects against self-incrimination and the sixth amendment assures that those arrested can not be held in jail indefinitely. The Miranda Warning read by officers specifically states that after one is made aware of their Miranda Rights, any confession or statements can be used against oneself lawfully (Doc J). Consequently, the Miranda ruling assures that one is fully aware of their rights and are also aware of the consequences if they choose to self-incriminate after being read their…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages

    With these rights in mind, do you wish to speak to me?” There has been a big change in what happens when someone is arrested in order to protect people’s rights. People should be allowed to hear their rights and have the right to a lawyer when being prosecuted by the police. That is what the Miranda v. Arizona court case is all about, giving people an option to protect themselves while being prosecuted. Ernesto Arturo Miranda at 23 years old had not completed ninth grade, but he was…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The last miranda right is,do you understand the rights I have just read to you, with these in mind do you wish to speak to me, but if you do then just keep in mind that anything you say can and will be used against you in the court of law. Did you know the miranda rights have to do with the fifth amendment. The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights and protects a person against being compelled to be a witness against himself or herself in a criminal case. The Fifth Amendment creates a number of rights relevant to both criminal and civil legal proceedings.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, this only applies when the suspect is in custody. According to GetLegal.com, if both elements are not present, the police are not required to give Miranda warnings. Many landmark cases have addressed and debated over what the true meaning of "custody" and "interrogation," however the main definition to go by is that custody means to be arrested. Therefore, the standard a court will apply is objective as they give a fair choice, where they will ask whether the average person is aware of the circumstances and of their rights but would have felt free to leave the scene and remain silent. If the answer is no, the suspect is put in…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Five Amendments

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Whereas the Fourth Amendment uses probable cause to set up if a crime is, has, or is about to occur and an arrest can be made. Then the Fifth Amendment comes into play, with the questioning of a person who has been arrested and the rights to the arrested person, specifically the reading of Miranda Rights. In 1966, Ernesto Miranda’s civil rights from the Fifth and Sixth were found to have been violated during the investigation and following interrogation. The Supreme Court determined that anyone who is in custody and being questioned needs to be read his or her specific rights, which included: “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is called the “Miranda Rights”. As a result of Miranda, anyone in police custody must be told these four adages before being questioned. Our laws were created to protect us and to bring justice to our country. However, they’re constantly broken. Therefore, those in jail are punished for their crimes yet, there are citizens whose punishments are too harsh, and there are citizens who are in jail for no known reason.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The police question suspects and witnesses for two reasons, to gather information about the crime and to try to get a suspect to confess if they believe the individual is guilty. This is where Miranda rights are important. The Constitution guarantees certain rights including the following. The right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney, either one that is appointed by the state or one that is privately hired. To start with the first line of the Miranda statement “You have the right to remain silent”.…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays