Supreme Court Case: Lisenba Vs. New York

Lisenba v, California (1941), Stein v. New York (1953), Gallegos v. Nebraska, 1951), Crooker v. California (1958), and Cicenia v. LaGay (1958) (Hemmens, 2014, p. 22). In another case, Gallegos v. Colorado (1952) the United States Supreme Court ruled that the confection a violation of due process after Gallegos who was 14 years of age at the time was denied his right to have contact with his mother (p. 22). The concerns that the cases cause among the liberal United States Supreme Court Justices consisted of cases displaying tactics by policemen in using psychological methods in getting suspects to confess (Hemmens, 2014). Another concern was lack of understanding of the due process rules without accessing all facts and circumstances. Other concerns dealt with …show more content…
Since Miranda v. Arizona (1956) the Supreme Court watered down the protection of suspects during interrogation in several ways. The Miranda warnings weakened when courts decided they were not Fifth Amendment rights (Hemmens, 2014). Miranda warnings weakened when Courts ruled that police violations are inadmissible and does not apply to evidence obtained through Miranda violated interrogations. In addition, the courts ruled that not all parts of the Miranda warnings need to be read to suspects. One of the most damaging Miranda warnings were weakened when courts decided that if a confession was made through an interrogation that violated Miranda rules, the confession is admissible once the suspect Miranda rights were properly read (Hemmens, 2014, p. 28). In view of violation of due