He ground for this eviction would be the fact that Rogers damaged the dry wall and an electrical socket. Damaging a property leased and reducing its market value it illegal and every tenant is expected to properly maintain the property leased to them. Rogers reacted in anger towards Larry’s condescending attitude and reluctance in repairing the leaking roof. Whereas Larry can be blamed indirectly for the damage caused by Rogers, Roger’s needs to take responsibility for his anger and fix the damage he caused on the wall and the electrical socket. On the hand, Larry may not have legal grounds for evicting Rogers, if Rogers assumes the responsibility to fix the damaged wall and the electrical socket. As tenant, he has been living well with his neighbors and paying rent on time. Therefore, if the two come to an agreement to both take responsibility in fulfilling their obligations bound by the leasing laws, no eviction would be
He ground for this eviction would be the fact that Rogers damaged the dry wall and an electrical socket. Damaging a property leased and reducing its market value it illegal and every tenant is expected to properly maintain the property leased to them. Rogers reacted in anger towards Larry’s condescending attitude and reluctance in repairing the leaking roof. Whereas Larry can be blamed indirectly for the damage caused by Rogers, Roger’s needs to take responsibility for his anger and fix the damage he caused on the wall and the electrical socket. On the hand, Larry may not have legal grounds for evicting Rogers, if Rogers assumes the responsibility to fix the damaged wall and the electrical socket. As tenant, he has been living well with his neighbors and paying rent on time. Therefore, if the two come to an agreement to both take responsibility in fulfilling their obligations bound by the leasing laws, no eviction would be