Summary Of Jerry's Self-Actualization Theory

Improved Essays
The following paper will be about juror #3, or rather, Jerry. Jerry is a fascinating individual with a deeply rooted disdain for children. One could imagine that it came from his rough upbringing with his own father that caused him to begin to see kids in much the same way as his father did. Jerry has always had a rough time maintaining social relations due to his narrowmindedness on almost every subject which leads him to have a short temper. Once his mind is focused on one set of beliefs, he seems to maintain the same belief regardless of anything and everything that could prove him wrong. It takes a great deal to break the concrete that he lays every time he has to think about a certain subject matter. This is especially true when it comes to kids. As previously mentioned, Jerry had a rough time growing up as his father never truly demonstrated love in a constructive manner. Misinterpreting the message of a steely man such as his father ended up causing him to repeat history by doing the same treatment with his own son. By not changing his ways, and falling victim to the same mentality as his predecessor, he ends up having a harsh relationship with his own son. Much of his bias toward the defendant can be founded upon his own broken home life. However, Jerry isn’t a bad man for all of his faults because most of his faults were not made on his own. He’s a hardworking man with much of life already under his belt. He was a high school graduate that didn’t attend college, but rather he started his own business. The theory that correlates with Jerry’s condition would be that of Carl Roger’s “Self-Actualization Theory”. …show more content…
Roger’s theory of fully functioning persons is the fully functioning person is the most desirable end result of psychological development and social evolution. Although Jerry has his life together for the most part, he is still missing some grand scale components that would help him to actually achieve actualization. His positive self-regard had been damaged at a young age which made it hard for him to maintain positive regard for others. That was made very evident with his treatment of his own son. In many ways, Jerry is the type of guy that always gets his way either by shouting, bullying, or belittling. He subconsciously maintains a set of conditional values that one must attain in order to receive worth from him, which makes it apparent that his path toward truly coming to terms with himself and the people around him is rough with many forks along the way. Jerry knows about his own demons and simply doesn’t want to confront them. With all of that being said, Jerry is making progress toward being a better person. Though his choices have been preordained to some degree, he is actively seeking to open himself to new experiences regardless of how they conflict with his ideologies. He doesn’t trust in himself at the moment in regards to his feelings because he knows that the hatred that he feels is misguided and unhealthy, to say the very least. He is definitely making an attempt to free himself from the rigidity of his old views by taking into account more experiences than his own in making decisions. Fully functioning persons are aware of all

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In his play Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose brings us back in time to 1957, to a jury room of a New York Court of Law where one man, Juror #8, confronts the rest of the jury to look at a homicide case without prejudice, and ultimately convinces Juror #2, a very soft-spoken man who at first had little say in the deliberation. Throughout the play, several jurors give convincing arguments that make one think about whether the boy is “guilty” or “not guilty.” Ultimately, one is convinced by ethos, logos, and pathos. We can see ethos, logos, and pathos having an effect on Juror #2 as he begins as a humble man and changes into someone brave at the end. Although all three modes play a part in convincing Juror #2, pathos is the most influential because…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crook County: Racism and Injustice in America’s Largest Criminal Court strives to discuss the corrupt practices that are occurring in the courts of Cook County, Illinois. This book was written by Nicole Gonzalez Van Cleve, is 272 pages in length, and was published on May 4, 2016. It wastes no time sugar-coating the great amount of racism that occurs in the courts in Cook County, going into great detail as soon as the book starts. All within the first chapter, Gonzalez Van Cleve covers just about every aspect of the people within the courthouse. She discusses judges, security, and attorneys stating that no matter which courtroom she was in, they were always all white.…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, he has behaviour role which conflict and frustration taken in action has influence his judgement. Moreover, his stubborn and bad temper has effect his decision and drive his vote of guilty. The juror 3 grow angry and nearly attack juror 8 and this action has weakness his support between the jurors. The intuition or feeling which make decisions with heart and escalation of commitment bias which do not admitted to making a wrong decision.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social loafing was exhibited by juror 7.when working as a group; this juror barely cared if the verdict came out ass guilty or not guilty. Only when brought to question on an individual level by juror 11 does this juror show genuine effort and care for the verdict. The devil’s advocate of the group was juror 8. This juror dared to give an opinion that was contrary to that of the collective group.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This statement by juror nine gives the viewers an understanding on how good juror eight appealed to the emotions of the others. He did not say that the boy wasn’t guilty; he provided evidence, and showed the others that there are possibilities that the boy did not kill his father. The discussion continues as they bring up the testimony of the witnesses of the murder. Juror eight appeals to the emotions of the jurors once again;…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As a parent the man is reacting to what his child said in a good way, but he also knows that for himself to be able to live he requires the…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Juror Five was a reserved and quiet man. He was apparently ashamed of his slum-dwelling upbringing and hesitant at first to speak up at first. Juror Five displayed a critical thinking characteristic by practicing restraint, controlling his feelings rather than being controlled by them and by thinking before he acted (Ruggiero, 1975). The unique trait Juror Five possess was he was familiar with the background of the defendant. The defendant was beaten by his father, grew up without a mother, and was often criticized for not having a stable life (Lument, 1957).…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was aware it would be difficult but had his mind set. There a time in someone’s life that they can look at it and realize it’s just not right. The path they are taking needs a change. It’s like they have walk so many years with a blind fold over their eyes and in seconds it falls, to realize they have not done anything productive with their lives. Their quick decisions to make changes in their life reminded me of Mel Robbins from TED Talk “How to Stop Screwing Yourself”.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1 page 27) The wisdom of the 9th juror which has developed over the years through his experiences in life grants him insight which aids not only himself but some of the other jurors’ to come to terms with the innocence of the boy. Thus, the 9th juror’s age plays a major role in his decision-making.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The importance given to their personal values and life experiences, in fact, played a crucial role in determining how fair, and conflicting the outcome of ethical decision making was, as initially, they were not giving the boy a chance to a fair trial. The juror’s job was to compare facts, look at the evidence discussing among themselves. By considering only the most obvious aspects in order to make a certain decision is never an ideal outcome or fair for the accused. Some jurors, especially number three was judging about the boy by comparing their circumstances with their own circumstances. They were especially looking for every negative circumstance to conclude the…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Similarly, juror three has prejudice against the defendant as this boy reminds him of his estranged sons perceived ingratitude and he rails against every argument that does not support what he already believes because “that’s how kids are nowadays”, although this is only revealed as the play…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Goal 1: Understanding reasons behind negative behavior a. Inquiries about nature of problem i. Why does Matthew have a hard time communicating with his wife and children? ii. Why do Jesse & Lindsay interact negatively at school? b. Face to face sequence i. How do you fight with significant others? ii.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Self-Actualization and Self-Determination are part of the concept of human potential. The article that this summary is about is of an article based upon self-actualization and self –determination. The main concept of this article is looking at a person’s own potential and how it is something more than previous psychologists have postulated. This article goes into depth about what SDT (Self-Determination Theory) is and how the writers go about trying to explain SDT.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The therapist uses interpretation and confrontation to counsel Will and examines his past and his current and past relationships. The therapist focuses on Will’s past abuse by his father. Because he was abused as a child, Will has a problem forming close relationships with people. He notes Will pushes people away before they can do the same to him. His only close friends are his buddies from his neighborhood.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He explains how it’s so easy to ignore, avoid and look away from issues. He acknowledges that it’s awkward for certain people to get involved in someone else fights or problems. Although he brings attention to the awkwardness that situation might bring he goes on to point out that, “people who are indifferent have meaningless lives” (Wiesel 2). With this aggressive approach he hits his audience with the hard facts that if they aren’t living in a good way and trying to produce good what are they living for?…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays