12 Angry Men Peer Pressure Analysis

Great Essays
Peer Pressure: Peer pressure effects on individual decision making. Therefore, it influenced the jurors to think for themselves. For example, juror number two was easily swayed by opinions of others. He had no confidence in himself and his own beliefs. Except for juror number eight, peer pressure impaired their judgment. Based on his maturity level it indicated that the greatest differences are found in juror number eight and three. Once juror (Jack) changed his vote from guilty to not guilty only because the rest of them eventually voted not guilty also. It showed many times that the several jurors changed their minds from not guilty to guilty and vice versa under peer pressure, and overpowering of the strong willed ones.

Empathy:
Juror
…show more content…
The importance given to their personal values and life experiences, in fact, played a crucial role in determining how fair, and conflicting the outcome of ethical decision making was, as initially, they were not giving the boy a chance to a fair trial. The juror’s job was to compare facts, look at the evidence discussing among themselves. By considering only the most obvious aspects in order to make a certain decision is never an ideal outcome or fair for the accused. Some jurors, especially number three was judging about the boy by comparing their circumstances with their own circumstances. They were especially looking for every negative circumstance to conclude the …show more content…
As leaders, we should evaluate each situation not only on its own merit but also against how it would fit into the organization’s own values. In addition, have the courage to stay with your instincts, beliefs, while examining all perspectives, as well as point of views to reach a fair, and ethical decision. Moreover, we need to have the ability to think outside the box, and steer away from our biases, and use active listening skills so that a wrong decision does not to impact anyone negatively. It may appear to be difficult at first, but taking an easy path to avoid altercations could put a lot at stake. Thinking through new, more, and fresh ideas will help to look at the bigger picture, and in return reach a solid decision that has less room for errors, a failure that we may regret later. It’s important to stay calm and collective, and think everything through before giving reaching a decision, and rationalize in your mind like juror number eight says, “I don’t know. It’s possible”. Decision making often includes the need to assign a reason for the decision and therefore justify

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In his play Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose brings us back in time to 1957, to a jury room of a New York Court of Law where one man, Juror #8, confronts the rest of the jury to look at a homicide case without prejudice, and ultimately convinces Juror #2, a very soft-spoken man who at first had little say in the deliberation. Throughout the play, several jurors give convincing arguments that make one think about whether the boy is “guilty” or “not guilty.” Ultimately, one is convinced by ethos, logos, and pathos. We can see ethos, logos, and pathos having an effect on Juror #2 as he begins as a humble man and changes into someone brave at the end. Although all three modes play a part in convincing Juror #2, pathos is the most influential because…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is very important because it gives the possibility that someone else might have committed the murder rather than the boy. This also gets some of the other jurors that little extra push to get them to join the non-guilty side. Literary Conclusion: In conclusion, Juror Five’s change in personality from Act One to Act Three is a crucial part in the Jurors deliberations Value: Twelve Angry Men describes what many of us fail see in social situations, dynamic personalities. And the effect these can have on a discussion, or in this case, a life. Many Jurors seem to stay static throughout the play, such as Juror Eight or Seven.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Observe Juror #8 (Henry Fonda) as the leader. In the movie, Juror #8 is able to persuade his fellow jurors to change their opinions. Based on what you have learned in class, describe the leadership style he uses to do this. Present your analysis providing evidence from the film to support your position.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the nearly final scene, Juror #3 rips up a picture he has of his son. We do not know exactly why, but it is evident that Juror #3 holds a grudge against his son. His son is brought up at the beginning of the story but is touched on very lightly. We learn at the end of the movie that the feelings Juror #3 had towards his son were being reflected onto the teen on trial. Having more of a backstory for this juror can make the audience sympathize him and understand why he is how he is.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Okay. Eleven to one, guilty.” (Rose 4). At first glance, all the jurors excluding Juror #8, view the boy as guilty. They claim that this is due to the evidence they were presented with, but it is also related to their bias and the fact that they want to go home as early as possible.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    but there is time constraint and group think has been taken place in the movie. Juror 3 is a biased against the 19-year old boy and he stands strongly in his vote of guilty. As a juror, he has an expected to assist the judge to give a fair trial.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The only person on that jury that could see clearly was the 3rd juror. Now my son is going to grow up as the new Al Capone, the biggest and the baddest person on the block. He is going to disgrace my good name. Even after I tried to raise him up good, he still turns into a cold blooded killer. My son will be a tornado.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This statement by juror nine gives the viewers an understanding on how good juror eight appealed to the emotions of the others. He did not say that the boy wasn’t guilty; he provided evidence, and showed the others that there are possibilities that the boy did not kill his father. The discussion continues as they bring up the testimony of the witnesses of the murder. Juror eight appeals to the emotions of the jurors once again;…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A fundamental aspect of the American justice system is the right of every person accused of a crime, to a trial by jury. The defendant, presumed ‘innocent until proven guilty’, has the right to be judged by a group of his or her peers based on the evidence presented, the assumption being that the defendant will be judged in a fair and impartial manner. However, human beings are fallible and can be subject to faulty reasoning, alongside irrational and biased thinking. The play Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose is set in a mid twentieth century American jury room. Twelve strangers, all male, are brought together to deliberate the facts of a seemingly straightforward case, a young man accused of murdering his father; their decision, which must be unanimous, will either take, or save a young mans life.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Negotiation Analysis

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    During their whole dispute, they come up with different ways to settle arguments, including going around the table and giving each person a chance to explain why they voted guilty or innocent and using evidence to prove one's point. Juror 8 always had evidence to back up his reasons, which convinced the others that maybe the boy is innocent. The ultimate resolution comes after everyone gives their input and puts all of the pieces together. They gain a different perspective which changes their thoughts on everything. After a long day, they…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Juror eight has very good observation skills. He almost is a detective juror, he seeks answers and he is good at creating scenarios to find answers. Juror eight gave his reason why he had doubt still, and why the other eleven should look the case over more. Juror eight then wanted to take another vote. He agreed that after his points, if no one else votes none-guilty that he will agree with a guilty verdict also.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First of all, they start talking about the knife that was used to kill the victim. All evidence points out that the knife was purchased by the boy and that he used it to kill his dad. Even though the boy said that he lost the knife, the jury is convinced that it is the same knife because it is a very rare and unique one, but then the juror #8 takes out of his pocket and exact look like knife, staying that he bought it at a pawn shop at the boy’s neighborhood pointing out that there is a possibility that anyone could have used a similar knife to kill the victim. At this moment some of the men start to doubt about their judgement. Then, juror #8 calls out for another voting, so they can find out if somebody has change his mind.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By juror #8 not going along with the group, he demonstrates the limits of conformity one of which is the sense of self. Juror #8 showed high self-esteem and leadership that help him to combat the pressure of conformity. After reaching a 11 to 1 vote, the other jurors are quick to criticise juror # 8 but he stands his ground and ask the group to think about the matter a bit more.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury 9: He is an old man and experienced. He observes and interprets in a rational way. He was bold enough to support Jury#8. • Now step back and focus on the systemic level: What clue does their personal history (occupation, nationality, socio-economic status, family circumstances, or educational background) provide about the societal faction each juror…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror #8 In the play “Twelve Angry Men” the Juror No.8 was a very important character, without him there would not have been any conflict and the young boy would have been executed without a proper trial. An Architect by profession, he stood out from the rest of jurors. He had the gift for intuitive thinking, understanding complex human relationships and inspiring others. He believed in trial-by-jury system and did his best to have the necessary procedures to come up with a fair outcome.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays