Empathy:
Juror …show more content…
The importance given to their personal values and life experiences, in fact, played a crucial role in determining how fair, and conflicting the outcome of ethical decision making was, as initially, they were not giving the boy a chance to a fair trial. The juror’s job was to compare facts, look at the evidence discussing among themselves. By considering only the most obvious aspects in order to make a certain decision is never an ideal outcome or fair for the accused. Some jurors, especially number three was judging about the boy by comparing their circumstances with their own circumstances. They were especially looking for every negative circumstance to conclude the …show more content…
As leaders, we should evaluate each situation not only on its own merit but also against how it would fit into the organization’s own values. In addition, have the courage to stay with your instincts, beliefs, while examining all perspectives, as well as point of views to reach a fair, and ethical decision. Moreover, we need to have the ability to think outside the box, and steer away from our biases, and use active listening skills so that a wrong decision does not to impact anyone negatively. It may appear to be difficult at first, but taking an easy path to avoid altercations could put a lot at stake. Thinking through new, more, and fresh ideas will help to look at the bigger picture, and in return reach a solid decision that has less room for errors, a failure that we may regret later. It’s important to stay calm and collective, and think everything through before giving reaching a decision, and rationalize in your mind like juror number eight says, “I don’t know. It’s possible”. Decision making often includes the need to assign a reason for the decision and therefore justify