How Did Early Americans Develop An Underdeveloped Society

Great Essays
US I Research Paper- Semester I

From the settling of English citizens to the New World in Jamestown, Virginia, or the settlement of pilgrims in Plymouth, Massachusetts, the Early American people endured battle, victory, and hardships. They were an underdeveloped society who fought to claim land that was not rightfully theirs, and would become close to succumbing to foreign countries and one very close to them, Great Britain. Through steady and great defiance, the Early Americas developed a strong government, while facing several challenges. They would become a substantial government and make decisions that would create a new and stronger nation that would unite as a whole. Before a stable government had been developed, there were two main political parties in the predeveloped United States of America: The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Federalists believed in a strong central government, while the Anti-Federalists believed in a strong state government. A strong central government would embark little say in the people, and most of the decisions would be made by Congress. A strong state government would give most of the power to the citizens and very little to Congress. Although not many people at this time believed political parties were smart or a positive way to form a nation, they still developed their views on how America should be run. Through the expansion of ideas on how their government should be run, members of the Cabinet developed their own political opinions. Federalism grew and new ideas were collected, and Democratic-Republicanism was created. Democratic-Republicanism was similar to Anti-Federalism, with the only difference being Thomas Jefferson came up with its ideas. All the while, Alexander Hamilton still stressed his viewpoint of taking political parties out of the picture. He thought political parties were destructive and should not be used. James Madison’s views were very similar, but he thought that in a nation built on freedom, political parties were inevitable. Before declaring Independence in 1776, each colony ran their own foreign and domestic affairs. Of the plans put in place, most failed. In 1754, Benjamin Franklin tried to establish the Albany Congress. The Albany Congress was a meeting of representatives and legislators from seven of the northern Colonies with 150 Iroquois Chiefs. The plan was supposed to be an agreement with the Iroquois to help the Americans in fighting conflicts against the French, but all of the representatives, legislators, as well as the Iroquois strongly disagreed. The diverse ideas of colonists played a key role in deciding what would be best for the new country and its people. From 1774 to 1775, Britain placed several Acts and laws on the colonies, which were known as the Intolerable Acts. These Acts restricted citizens from importing goods, making their own laws, and had Great Britain control their religious aspects. Economically, this put a huge debt on the colonies and the government. In late 1774, a group of colonists met to discuss the issues at hand, and called themselves the Continental Congress. Their first meeting was to figure out what they would do about the Acts that Britain put on them. The Continental Congress decided to ask citizens to help them in rebelling against the unfair laws. The United States declared independence from Great Britain on July 4, 1776. The Declaration of Independence formally established the US as its own nation. A little over 2 months later, on September 11, 1776, a peace conference took place on Staten Island to discuss the declaration. British Admiral, Lord Richard Howe, and American representatives attended the meeting. Howe demanded America repeal the declaration , that the colonists had worked hard to establish. The
…show more content…
President Washington refused to serve for a third term, so John Adams was elected for one term. The government and American citizens were able to become financially stable and chose to migrate out west, beyond the Mississippi River. More people from foreign countries immigrated to the United States, which made the population grow to enormous amounts. With them, they brought ideas for inventions and new technologies, which lead to the Industrial Age. The government progressed with stronger financial strategies, a more organized and advanced military, and set ways of dealing with conflicts and foreign

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    American citizens have always questioned their central government. We were in a war and trying to ratify one of the most important documents to this day, the Constitution. Also, over the years, our nation wrote ment documents, constitutions, papers, and other things that contributed to our central government. During the time of 1754 to 1789, there were a lot of americans who didn't like a strong central government as shown in the the Albany plan, Articles of confederation, and the Anti Federalist.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Richard Hakluyt the elder was an Elizabethan lawyer and a major proponent of English colonization of America in the 1570s. He wrote the “Inducements to the Liking of the Voyage Intended towards Virginia in 40. and 42. Degrees” in 1585 to justify and stimulate the colonization of Virginia. Hakluyt’s “Inducements” provides an insight into early British perception of North America long before the first English colony in Jamestown was even established.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Short Essay One thing was clear during the convention of 1787, there were an astonishing number of viewpoints that clashed wherever they could. The main topic for debate was the distribution of control. Who would make the decisions for the people the state government or national government? The worry was that if the state government had primary control over the people's interests, who would police them? The Federalists wanted to make sure that the state government officials did not influence political policy to further their own interests.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a military child, I grew up in many places, though I was born in Fitchburg, Massachusetts. Fitchburg “was a wilderness until 1718” (). It was at this time that time that a man named Samuel Page came into the area, and began establishing life in the area, though not directly in Fitchburg. Eventually, a garrison was established by Samuel’s son, and people lived in that area, such as John Fitch. At first, the people in this town faced various hardships against the Indians, but eventually, “the people were ready to turn their hearts and hands to peaceful productivity on their farms” ().…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The election of President Washington was not a turning point in the American political party system, due to the lack of changes in the system as a direct result of his election; rather, the election of Thomas Jefferson as president served as a focal turning point in the change of the political party system in America because of the way it introduced changes that would gradually begin altering the system. The election of President Washington was not a turning point in the political party system of America. At the time of George Washington’s election, the Federalist and Antifederalist schools of thought had already been fully developed, and did not change due to Washington’s election. A few years later, these groups were replaced by the Federalist…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Partisan Politics occurs when one political party does not agree with another political party and is unwilling to compromise his political beliefs. The year 1790 was the birth year of partisan politics in the United States just as Washington’s presidency was coming to a close. The two factions emerging would be the Federalists in support of Alexander Hamilton and those opposing were the Democratic-Republicans that were led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. The Federalists believed in a strong central government that centered around the rich and elite, along with a need for economic growth. The Republicans believed that a strong central government would only oppress or restrict the rights of citizens.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the American Revolution where they fought for the independence of the United States. The important people who believed in different things separated themselves apart to two different political parties the Federalist and Anti-Federalist. The first was The Federalist a party who believed in a strong national government who live in the rural area. The second group is the Anti-Federalist they opposed a big government, but they did believe in state rights who live in the countryside. Although some may argue that during the 18th century both groups had some similarities with government but in reality they had opposing views of how to run the country between big government that would help more people or states running on their own that might…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of political parties can be dated back to the pre-revolutionary Whigs and Tories that arrived to the colonies from Great Britain. As the need for a division in politics subsided, these parties became less official factions. However, when the issues of the territory began to change, the presence of factions began to change. The evolution of factions into rivaling political parties in the 1790s resulted from contrasting views between Thomas Jefferson’s Republicans and Alexander Hamilton’s Federalists due to different beliefs in regards to the Constitution’s power and the impact of foreign policy and economic growth on the young United States.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Although the picture is still continuing to change, the idea that All of those for and All of those against is still the basic foundation. The Federalists were the supporters of a strong, federal government, where the government had the power. The Anti-federalist were the supporters of strong state power, where the states had more power. With this in mind, the framers combined both parties wants and need to create the Constitution. The Anti-federalist made sure not one division of the government had too much power.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The pilgrims have negative wording that they used to describe the natives. They show themselves as betters is by tricking the natives with unjust contracts. The Pilgrims first show themselves as better by degenerating the language of the natives. Of Plymouth Plantation by William Bradford and The General History of Virginia by John Smith are the two texts examined in the essay. It turns out that what might have been thought about the relations between settlers and natives might be completely…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am firmly favored the Federalists. A solid focal government has been exceptionally helpful to our nation, as it has been demonstrated. They needed to see a change, though the Anti-Federalists needed to keep the government. The federalists needed to see an improvement in our nation.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By the 1700s, the New England and the Chesapeake regions developed into two different colonies due to each colony’s reason for settlement, consisting of religious and economic reasons, their personal beliefs, and their growth in their society. While the settlers of New England immigrated to the Americas to escape religious persecution, the settlers of the Chesapeake region immigrated for more economic reasons—the search of gold. Each colony’s way of life contrasted from one another in the way they lived in their societal systems. The impacts of these differences evolved the colonies uniquely. Documents A and D reveal the religious motivations behind the New England settlers’ settlements.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    AJ Siciliano, Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists Essay Before the ratification of the constitution, two original political parties fell consistent during the 1700’s, Federalists and Antifederalists. In shorter terms, Federalists wanted a stronger central government to have overall power of the states, rather the Antifederalists wanted something similar to the Articles of Confederation, where the states as individuals, had more power than the central government. Both, although strongly contrasting, contained one main similarity, thirst for the creation of a new country, just with different ideas of how it should function.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Shanai Jones 10/13/15 U.S.History 3A Essay As a proud and humbled Native American, that is apart of a group of people who were the first settlers on the face of the American Continent, and to go up against the disadvantages and unfairness that we were treated with, makes me feel disturbed and enraged. The settlers deprived us from our land, enforced their religion, shifted us onto reservation camps and had the audacity to call us godless…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Federalism is a system of government where territory is controlled by two levels of government. The best examples of federalism are the United States, Canada, and India, but why would they choose this form of government over others? Federalism’s two levels of government are: national and state government. It’s because the national government handles the issues of the entire country, while the smaller political subdivisions, or state government, handle the local concerns of the people, or the individual state. It leaves each of the governments with individual powers so they can balance each other out.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays