Response to Ward Churchill’s Essay There are several reasons why Ward Churchill argues that names of sports teams such as “Braves”, “Indians”, and “Chiefs” are examples of outright racism and as insulting to Native Americans as the “Redskins” mascot. First, in real life, names of Indian Americans (in a combination with native symbols and images) are frequently used in a derogatory manner, depicting native Indians as inhuman, menacing, and grotesque. Using tribal names of Indian Americans helps to condition general public to view Native Americans as savages by associating names of tribes with dehumanizing, offensive, and derogatory practices. Second, although it may be argued that such names are intended to demonstrate respect for Native…
Throughout the years society has become more and more sensitive to certain topics regarding feelings and emotions. The smallest action or word can trigger a person to become offended or get angry about a topic or event. One such topic is the use of Native American mascots throughout different school, universities and professional sports teams. There are two sides for this argument that most people stand on, they are either all for or all against the use of such mascots. The use of Native American mascots gives off a sense of pride and honor to those who represent the mascot by making them feel a part of something important, retains the heritage of the tribe in that community, and shows values such as leadership and bravery that many Native…
The article “Indian Mascots-You’re Out” by Jack Shakley, was published in the Los Angeles Times in August 2011. The author argues the issues of sport teams having Native American names. The author wrote the article due to more and more Native Americans protesting at stadiums. With the article being divided into four sections. It was pretty straight forward.…
The author feels like his race is being humiliated. In the article “Indian Mascots- You’re Out” the author Jack Shakley talks about his times growing during Indian stereotypes. The author wants to prove whether or not Native Americans are being disrespect through the use of Indian mascots for sports. Shakley starts the article off with a childhood memory of his back in the 1950’s.…
Albert and Alberta are the proud mascots of the University of Florida. I will be covering information about the University of Florida and the requirements of the school. Their school colors are orange and blue. They have many sports teams that you can join if you are interested in that they offer to a student. The university of Florida is also a public school for anyone attending.…
In the cartoon, “ Mascots” Phil Hands persuades middle aged Americans about how Native Americans feel about them being used as High school mascot because it can be offensive. Should High schools be able to use Native Americans as a mascot? “ Reservation High school home of the land stealing pale faces.” This shows disrespect between the races, and is not acceptable. Since having different races as mascots is offensive, they should not be aloud.…
Although I understand and respect many of my classmate’s views and points, I do not agree with them entirely. What I do agree on is that offensive names such as “Redskins” should be removed if that term really is that insulting. I do not agree names like “Indians” should be changed. I also do not believe that every “Indian” mascot should be removed. When people say that the Mascot is an unrealistic and stereotypical portrayal, they are right.…
Today many Native Americans are feeling offended because of the mascots of teams/schools. Indian Mascots should be banned. The names can be kept. Most nicknames should be banned as well.…
In the article, The real history of Native American team names Erik Brady, Director of the National Museum of the American Indian: Do Native American mascots honor or offend? Brady believes that it is offensive stating that, “ … American Indian team names simply did not and could not connote respect in the age when they emerged.” Therefore, during this time period, there was a stigma against Natives and he believes the name fits that stigma. No other race was respected as much as another during this time period, many races were discriminated against and ridiculed. Being that this was an issue around this time how does the name “Redskins” not be seen as offensive?…
Arguing the Feelings of Native American Mascots In “Appropriating Native American Imagery Honors no one but Prejudice,” Amy Stretten argue “Racial stereotyping, inaccurate racial portrayals and cultural appropriation do not honor a living breathing people. Plain and simple, cultural appropriation- especially when members of the culture protest the appropriation - is not respectful” (Stretten par.7). In short, Stretten is arguing that the way society goes about “honoring” Native Americans is offensive and should be discontinued.…
Displaying that it is both ironic and honorable, the cartoon depicts a Native American stating “we are only trying to honor your heritage”. If Caucasians have the ability to use Native Americans as mascots, so should Native Americans have the ability to utilize Caucasians as symbols. Honor is achievable through fairness. The ability to relate to others beliefs can assist in what is right or wrong to do.…
Using Native American names for sport team mascots devalues their experiences. In the article, “The “F Word””, Firoozer Dumas states, “My cousin’s name, Farbod, means “Greatness”. When he moved to America, all the kids called him “Farthead”. My brother Farshid (“he who enlightens”) became “Fartshit”.” When Firoozeh Dumas moved to America with his family the names they were given that meant something so great to them, were devalued and made into a mockery.…
Since the 1960s, people have been fighting this injustice by trying to abolish Indian mascots on sports teams. The 1970 abolishment of “Little Red”, the OU Indian mascot sparked a chain of Indian mascots that have been banned in sports since then (Tramel, 2002). The once mascot for OU, “Little Red”, represented the Oklahoma Sooners for many years before being abolished from the University after students spoke up about the demeaning messages that the mascot embodied. The presence of Native Americans on the University of Oklahoma’s campus began around 1908 when the first “Indian club” formed (Kettle & Masters).…
Get over it” (King 64). King concedes that it is fair for fans to get attached, as they recognize that team and have fond memories practicing the rituals and traditions associated with the team name; but King also pinpoints that post-Civil Rights era America generates this feeling that racism is not a problem anymore, simply an unwarranted feeling at best. While expressing minimal sympathy to Redskins fans, King still makes it very clear that the harms associated with Native American mascots certainly outweigh the fan’s sense of connection. The core of King’s reasoning for this opinion centers around the fact that while racist practices have been in place for some time, a traditions longevity does not make it any less racist, yet rather opens the door for more ignorant decisions. King personifies this by recounting the former president of the National Congress of American Indians experience a Redskins game, where people started pulling her hair and calling her a redskin, leaving her to feel…
Without taking into consideration how the Native Americans felt about it or their point of view, people fought the wrong side of the argument this whole time, not taking in the thought that these mascots, and names degrade American Indians, emphasizing the fact that the mascots and names need to be removed.…