Harris: Guilty Or Irresponsible?

Improved Essays
Show More
Is Harris guilty, it’s a question that has torn my mind. Yes, he is guilty. Yes, he should be punished. Yet, was he morally responsible for the crime? Upon reading the article and learning about his life and how it was always headed in a downward motion. While I want to believe that he had free will and was able to stop the killing if he wanted too. He didn’t have to kill those people, yet causal determinism would argue this. Causal determinism states that every action, belief, and desire is a function of causes that are out of our control. This would mean that Harris is not morally responsible for his crime that are out of our control. This would mean that Harris is not morally responsible for his crime because he can’t control what happens …show more content…
What happened with Harris was his own undoing. How could everything be predetermined? Sure, my past actions have put me into the position i'm in today. Yet, even if the situation comes up where I can rob a bank, I wouldn’t. My personal moral won’t let me. Harris made up his decision to rob a bank and to kill. Nothing in his past determine morals, that was his own moral decision and nothing can change that. He had the decision, pull the trigger or don’t. Both easy actions, when put out of context, but in that moment not pulling the trigger seems to be the obvious …show more content…
They would agree with Holback that free will is an illusion. That our ideas come to us involuntarily, thus causing us to think we are making our own decisions while really just being controlled. If the actions of a man are never free and are always being controlled, a man's beliefs and opinions are just a factor of the ideas and opinions in our heads. Thinking like this would lean towards Harris not being morally guilty for killing and robbing the bank. If everything he does is not in his control how can he be morally guilty? There is no actual underlying proof that a free will exists. Yet, the most common people in society today believe in a free will. Kierkegaard had the idea that each individual must give meaning to his or her own life, that we make decisions on subjective meaning. It really comes down to what you choose to believe, causal determinism or existentialism? Causal determinism and existentialism both have very believable logic behind them. Yet, to believe that no person on this earth has any choice in their life seems to take the meaning away. I agree with Kierkegaard, each individual must give meaning to their own life. If everything was being determined for us, I don’t believe there would be a meaning of our existence. Thus, propelling the idea of existentialism ahead of causal determinism and accusing Harris of being morally responsible for his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis On Robert Harris
    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis On Robert Harris

    Did you consider what Mr Baker felt when he arrested the man who murdered his son? In the father’s words you can read furry and pain “I’ve no time for do-gooders who say that he should be spared. Look what he did to my son.”, or even in a paragraph entitled “FURY OF A VICTIM’S FATHER”. Personally, if I was a victim’s relative I would have no sympathy for Harris because I would know that he is alive in a prison and my son, brother or cousin would be dead and the pain would be there.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Eric Harris Research Paper
    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Eric Harris Research Paper

    However, this shows consistency within the police force in Littleton, Colorado; nearly every piece of evidence concerning Eric Harris was not investigated, before the attack. If, hypothetically, the investigation about the pipe bomb had been carried through, Eric would have likely been charged with a felony. Additionally, if the bomb discovery was coupled with the discovery of his website, heavy action would have been taken against Eric.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Steven Truscott's Wrongful Conviction
    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Steven Truscott's Wrongful Conviction

    Firstly, the defence counsel and jury were not provided crucial information that may have altered the outcome of the trial. Had they had access to the two unofficial autopsy documents, the defence could have argued about whether Truscott committed the crime, due to the assumed time of death of the victim. Additionally, the Crown failed to recognize Dr. Penistan’s description of his findings as an “agonizing reappraisal”. If the Crown had revealed this information, Truscott could possibly have been released earlier.…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Todd Smith Character Analysis
    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Todd Smith Character Analysis

    Juror two (Soft determinist/compatibilist): We can have circumstantial freedom even if our choices are determined by prior causes or in other words metaphysical freedom. Metaphysical freedom in my view is to do with a different universe than we are not in. Metaphysical freedom is almost saying we have a God like power to choose what we do solely from our prior causes. Circumstantial freedom is just that we are still in this realm and can still make our own decisions but with affects still taking place. We are still in cause and effect but we choose what happens.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Mind: R. E. Hobart's Conditional Analysis Of
    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mind: R. E. Hobart's Conditional Analysis Of

    If determinism is true, then it means that each and every action is ultimately caused by past events in such a way where, according to the laws of nature, they lead to one and only one effect - as is suggested by D’Holbach in the above example. With Hobart’s argument for power, this person who chooses not to drink the water has demonstrated free will because he is capable of drinking of the water even though, given the state of the universe and the laws of nature, he could never have made that decision. If our actions are determined by reasons as determinists claim, then I see no reason to believe that having the power to do something is sufficient to prove that he has free will as this man could not have been compelled to any other choice in the current state of the…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ep11 Blood Hungry
    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ep11 Blood Hungry

    Showing that a lot of crimes are driven on religion. Along with crimes a lot of people who are cannibals do so because of a religious story so they are driven to eat others based off of religion. So based off of evidence his motivation for these crimes was religious because of the things he did during the murders and his background in…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ayer Compatibilism Analysis
    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ayer Compatibilism Analysis

    In this paper, I argue that Ayer’s reasoning of compatibilism is false. The reason this is true is because his explanation and reasonings of the topic are completely contradictory. Throughout the essay, I will call into question what Ayer believes to be true, while at the same time, try to “take a walk in his shoes,” to see where he is coming from and to dig deeper into why Ayer believes his theories on the topic are correct. Ayer holds the belief that free will and determinism can both be true at the same time. He states his belief of free will as when, “it is implied that I could have acted otherwise,” and believed that I could have acted otherwise, then i am said to be morally responsible for what i have done (Ayer).…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hard Determinism Vs Free Will
    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Hard Determinism Vs Free Will

    The reconciliation of moral responsibility and freewill allows us to understand how having freewill forces humans to believe that their behaviors and doings are morally responsible because their actions are caused naturally and or are determined. The question here is what is free will? Historically speaking, it is the action of acting freely; meaning everything is done causally due to the person. Free will and moral responsibility go hand in hand, but the issue is can a person really be in control of these things they had no control over? The problem with free will is that we believe determinism is true, but also that we are morally responsible; meaning we are held responsible for the actions we choose.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    D Holbach's View Of Free Will And The Compatibilist Theory Of Free Will
    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages

    D Holbach's View Of Free Will And The Compatibilist Theory Of Free Will

    Free will is the known as the capability to decide between different potential courses of action and is a highly questioned topic in the philosophical world. Free will, also closely accompanied to the views of moral responsibility, has some philosophers reason that only actions which are free willed are justified to accept the blame of the action while other philosophers oppose this view. Baron d’Holbach views free will under the idea of Determinism, which entails that only one sequence of actions is possible, which concludes that there is no such thing as free will or choice in the truly deterministic world. In contrast, Compatibilist theorists, like Stace, assert that free will exists and can be well-matched with Determinism.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Consequence Argument Analysis
    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Consequence Argument Analysis

    Psychologically speaking, as humans, we are wired to think that we have the freedom to act and do based upon our own self judgment. For simplistic reasons, let’s assume that this “freedom” is analogous to free will which is a philosophical idea in which to act freely is to have multiple open futures and possibilities, or to be able to choose between many different choices. Determinism is the belief that every event (including action, choices, and decisions) is the inevitable result of a causal chain of events. In other words, a choice with an action (A) is the inevitable result of an earlier action of an earlier choice. This principle presents a problem for the concept of free will.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Compatibilism By W. T. Stace
    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Compatibilism By W. T. Stace

    Some people may go ahead and steal to stay alive while others may choose to act differently and do the complete opposite. Your actions solely depend on you and what type of person you are. Stace also claims that it is delusion to think that determinism is incompatible with free will meanwhile it is merely impossible for them to be compatible as determinism claims that freedom is just an illusion while free will is the complete opposite and is the notion that people are free to act and behave as they please. How can free will and determinism be compatible when people have no control of the causes that occur around them which according to Stace is the reason that they act in a certain manner? If people are not able to genuinely control their actions due to predetermined causes that make them act a certain way, then do they really have free will?…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Paul Holbach's Argument For Universal Determinism
    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Paul Holbach's Argument For Universal Determinism

    The debate of Free Will v Determinism is one that has gone on for centuries, and shall continue to go on for many to come. There are many who believe that their view is the end all, be all, correct view to hold. While not all of these thinkers are correct in their standings, Paul Holbach’s essay, “The Illusion of Free Will,” lays out a strong argument for universal determinism; man does not have any free will, and all of his actions are determined by the laws of nature. His argument is one that is accurate and strong, leaving little to criticize, despite what many believe to be proof that he is incorrect: the presence of choice and the absence of restraint. He takes these two beliefs and shows exactly why they do not denote free will, and all…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Relationship Between Free Will And Determinism
    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Relationship Between Free Will And Determinism

    This philosophical question is still not unsolved, but in this essay I will argue that a freedom of choice cannot be had by an agent in a deterministic world. Determinism thesis states that all events in the universe are determined by previous events. In determinism, every even is determined to happen by the laws of the the system.it is assumed that once the laws are set and the systems are decided, everyone following the event in the system is also decided. This assumption proves that humans are not free to chose how they act, but are determined by prior events over which they have no control over. The freedom that is precluded by determinism is the freedom to act without recourse to prior events, which means not having a choice determined and is able to act many different ways in any situation regardless of the cause.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Determinism And Predestination
    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Determinism And Predestination

    Determinism and predestination are often subjects that are argued amongst in religious groups and have come up several times in history, however does anyone have any real choice or free will, if determinism dictates how the people of the world behave, then can someone be held accountable for any wrongdoing they may commit? If God Predetermines what a person will do would it be fair to punish a person who is corrupt, not only in the sense that they commit wrongdoings, but that they may be corrupt in a way that is not necessarily wrong, but instead in a way that has strayed from the “correct” form? This refers to the mentally ill and the “predeterminism” in their lives. A passage in the Bible from Proverbs 16:9 “In their hearts…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Does Free Will Really Exist?
    • 1101 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Does Free Will Really Exist?

    There has been many different theories about the topic of Free will. For instance, does free will even truly exist, is it defined by our own religious beliefs or is it simply brought on by cause and effect. Free will is nothing more than our own personal freedom to make choices in our lives. It can be brought on by an urge or naturally carefree feeling, to be able to choose with out the interference or opinions of others. A free course of action driven by our own means of self gratification for the betterment of oneself.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  Cookie Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings