Gun Control Amendment

Superior Essays
The second amendment of the United States of America says, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This is the law that makes an outline for what all of the other gun laws must be. So naturally, the words of this amendment are twisted to mean different things. These things normally being either for or against gun restriction laws. The side of the argument that is in favor of heavy gun control laws says that this amendment, “...only protects state’s rights to maintain militias and not an individual’s right to own any gun he or she wants to” (“Washingtonpost”). While the side that is against gun restriction laws says that this amendment, “...recognizes the inalienable natural right to self defense” (“Washingtonpost”). This discussion has become one of the most popular legal arguments being debated right now in the United States. In the year 2012 a study showed that the United States had the highest gun ownership rates in the world with there being 88.8 guns for every 100 people (“Washingtonpost”). Another study showed that ⅓ of citizens were armed (“Rollingstone”).This not even counting illegal guns obtained in the country. Another study showed that the United States was also the country with the highest firearm related homicide rates at 3.21 homicides for every 100,000 people. In fact the only country that even came close to the U.S.’s homicide rates was Canada at 0.51 homicides per 100,000 people. (“Washingtonpost). This being said, many American citizens in favor of strict gun laws believe that there is a direct correlation between these statistics and make the argument that more guns will only make matters worse. Permitting relaxed gun laws that allow things such as concealed carry have been shown to have a 2% increase in murders and a 9% increase in crimes such as rape, assault, robbery, auto theft, burglary, and larceny (“concealed guns”). Throughout 15 colleges 1,649 students were surveyed and 79% of them stated that they actually would feel less safe knowing that students, teachers, and visitors were allowed to carry a concealed weapon. Statistics back up this opinion proving that it is 4.5 times more likely to be shot during an assault if a victim tries to defend themselves with a gun. Having more guns, “risks escalating everyday disagreements into public shootouts” said the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. An example of this is January 13, 2014 when a retired police officer took out a gun and shot a man in the same movie theater as him for texting during a movie (“Concealed Guns”). “A bad guy with a gun is best stopped by a good guy with a gun.” This is a point often made by people in favor of gun rights.However no mass shootings in the past 30 years were actually stopped by a hero defending themselves with a gun. In the case of Gabby Giffords, who was a civilian with a gun, an innocent man was almost shot by Gifford as she was trying to shoot the original shooter (“Rollingstone”). Furthermore when asked 75% of incarcerated felons said that they would carry a gun if they believed their victim to be armed. It can then be estimated that if there were more concealed carries allowed there would also be an increased number of crimes where the criminal is using a gun (“Concealed Guns”). When researching the connection between states with strict gun laws and the amount of access youths have to guns, the access they have goes down the stricter the laws are. States were rated on a point system of how …show more content…
With approximately 25 Americans murdered each day due to gun violence, handing out more guns just does not seem like the right thing to do (“Progressive”). According to statistics the people of the United States already have guns and concealed carries. Guns do not kill people, people kill people, so it does not make sense that people should be given more guns. 80-90% of Americans agree that better background checks should be put into play to limit who is able to receive a murderous weapon (“Concealed

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of the free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" (Vernick and Teret). These are the core of what America was founded upon. Furthermore, the Kansas constitution dictates that the state militia is composed of "All able bodied citizens between the ages of 21 and 45 years" (Vernick and Teret). The second amendment is one of the defining features of the U.S. Constitution and the bill of rights therein, and given that "83% of Americans will be the victim of a violent crime in the course of their lives" (Koppel), everyone living in this most wonderful of countries has a constitutional duty to own firearms.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Classic Argument Paper – Gun Control vs. Pro 2nd Amendment Argument ENGL 123 Jesse H. Dixon Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Worldwide It’s should come as no surprise that the gun control argument in America is fiery and emotional, with logic and civility most often being pushed aside by frustration, fear and anger. Most arguments over gun control come full of fallacies, and emotional appeal rather than true factual data. Neither side is happy with current gun laws. Gun owners feel their rights are being infringed, while gun control advocates believe it’s far to easy for the criminal or crazy person to get a firearm. Is there a better solution to the argument over gun control and the 2nd amendment?…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights states clearly that the people’s right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed on. This has led to one of the most complicated and volatile issues in America today. People on both sides of this issue have strong beliefs. Some argue that when our founding fathers wrote the bill of rights, the guns were not as deadly as the ones available today. Supporters of the Second Amendment today argue that people’s right should not be infringed on no matter what.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment The second amendment in the constitution can be defined as, “a well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Cornell University). Most Americans believe this to be a right to own firearms privately for self-defense. There are many who debate that it is only the federal government who has the right to arm its military and that private gun ownership should be banned; however, I do not agree with this argument.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Second Amendment, is a very controversial area under discussion in the media. Both advocates for and against gun ownership have been lobbying Congress to gain legislation in their favor for decades. Congress is at a standstill over gun issues and has voted down all proposals on gun control in the legislature. Although regulation is useless against criminals some harm can be avoided through tougher unified gun control, the American people have a Second Amendment right to bear arms, nevertheless regulators must decide who should be allowed ownership of what guns and if any training should be required among other issues, regulation must be clearly defined in order to protect society from needless harm. Proponents of gun control have debated that the Second Amendment only applies to members of militias and does not apply to individual…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Some people think that gun control laws are against the bill of rights and it gives a chance to the government to control people. The second amendment to the constitution of the United Stated supports that the gun is allowed to be used. In the book "The Second Amendment and the Personal Right to Arms", it states that "the right of people to keep and bear arms." (William 1236) It means that the second amendment allows the citizens to have a gun ownership.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment of the Constitution states "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. " The meaning of this is that all U.S citizens have the right to own a gun and use it in any situation needed, and when it says “Shall not be Infringed” it means to Actively break terms of a Law or Agreement. A gun's purpose in mostly to protect and defend people. I am for the second amendment that is my point of view.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second Amendment In Texas

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The United States of America developed the 2nd amendment so that citizens would be able to protect themselves legally against any dangers ahead of them. This civil right was intended under the assumption that citizens would use it to defend themselves under militia structure. However, as time went by the country has begun to use guns for personal protection of individual life and property. The manipulation of this civil right has led Texas legislators to create new gun laws that instead of doing away with guns they lawfully allow their use.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most topical issues in United States is gun control. The issue has reached the supreme court over and over again, and many different people have different stances on it.. The basis of is the Second Amendment, written in the Bill of Rights. The Second Amendment states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." (U.S. Const.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The second amendment of the constitution states, "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. " The second amendments mean that: to keep the country free from too much control, the people are allowed to keep and use their firearms. Under any circumstance this right shall not be violated .Since it’s our right why is there so many limitations and restrictions.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To continue, the second amendment means the people of America have the right to have a gun for the safekeeping of our country. This affects gun control policies by saying anyone can have a gun. If the government wanted to ban guns, they are taking away the country’s freedom. Also, they would be taking guns away from the Militia, so if the army was in a different country and people attack America, the Militia would have no way of fighting back.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If one person does not feel that owning firearms is right for them, they don’t have to buy them, but they should not attempt to tell someone else that because they don’t want a gun, the other person shouldn’t have one either. Most importantly, the second amendment must be preserved. There are those who feel since the wording on the bill of rights says to “form a well-armed militia” and since America has a fine full time fighting force the need for a militia is no longer present, and they would have a pretty good argument. But reflecting back on the George Washington’s letter in the Federalist papers, and the Supreme Court ruling, the right to keep and bear arms is about so much more than being able to stand up an army.…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Second Amendment

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of the most disputed debates in the modern world is over the Second Amendment which states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (“Second Amendment”).…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The right to bear arms has been topic of discussion among people since ancient times. Political theorist John Locke viewed possession of arms as a personal freedom one should abstain. The Second Amendments purpose and meaning has been a key controversy. The Amendment adopted in 1791, was constructed so each state maintained a militia, composed of everyday citizens who served as part time soldiers which were well regulated. People feared the federal government would use its standing army to go against its will on the states, the authors of the second amendment intended to protect the states militias’ right to bear arms.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control and the Second Amendment According to Schulman (1991), the text of the Second Amendment of the US Constitutions reads as follows: “a correctly structured militia, for purposes of state security; the right of the citizens to have and to carry arms shall not be challenged.” This is a paraphrased version of what is contained in the original constitutional document. Nonetheless, it captures the spirit of the constitution regarding the issue of guns and their possession thereof.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays