Gun Control Restrictions

Improved Essays
Even though people believe gun control restrictions will not prevent criminals from obtaining a firearm I believe that the united states should make restriction on who can own guns. If there was gun control restrictions there would be less shootings, less accident with kids obtaining firearm, and prevent fewer suicides.

Gun control will decrease crimes. If people that do not need guns do not have them it will lower violent crimes.In cliffnotes.com it states that “More handguns in circulation equals more violent crimes.
This explains that if too many firearms are circulating in increases the chance of violent crimes, therefore if there are less guns there will be less violent crimes. If there were gun restrictions it would make it harder for
…show more content…
Put them in jail or a secure mental institution. This view seems convincing at first, but people can't just recognize a killer by just looking at them. And in the past most mass shootings, family and friends usually say the person was calm and that they would never expect something like that.

According to Erich Pratt from USA TODAY the Lafayette, La., theater; the Charleston, S.C., church; the military recruiting center in Tennessee.Guns were outlawed at all these locations, and yet the killers ignored the bans. Plus, the shooters passed background checks — as did the Oregon shooter, who passed several background checks in purchasing his firearms. Albert Einstein defined “insanity” as doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results. Clearly, the call for more gun control is insane — it doesn’t work. While this position is logical because the criminals could have been stopped by security but they managed to pass them. It's logical that we can put the toughest laws and put the strongest gun control laws, but even with that it will not stop every criminal, but the goal is to decrease as many death as possible, also they do not take into consideration gun control is not only trying to stop criminals,
…show more content…
If someone is breaking into your house, calling 911 will probably not save you. Self-defense techniques do not provide protection against an armed attacker or more than one man. Only a gun provides the ability to defend oneself from a safe distance. Guns are also an equalizer for women and the elderly or handicapped”. What this argument does not take into account is that Americans are far more likely to injure themselves or someone else with a firearm then use it for self defence in 2012 there were 8,855 criminal gun homicides in the FBI's database, but only 258 fatal shootings that were deemed "justifiable" that's less than 3 percent. According to the article The Week “the annual per capita risk of death during a home invasion is 0.0000002 percent”, nearly zero.compare the self defence statistics to the accidental fatalities at home due to guns,265 children under 18 picked up a gun and shot themselves or someone else in 2015 of those 83 ended in death, which is about 31percent. This information show overall it is safer not to have a gun at

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Many people turn to guns as a safety blanket, however, with the statistics given it does not seem like guns are helping protect…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control has been extremely controversial in society for years. In the essay “Just Take Away Their Guns,” James Q. Wilson argues his view on stricter gun control laws. He writes, “Legal restraints on the lawful purchase of guns will have little effect on the illegal use of guns” (Wilson, 1994, p.125). He backs up his statement with the statistics that 5/6 of handguns used in crimes are either stolen or purchased privately. With this being said, he displays that increasing legal restraints on purchasing guns will have little to no effect on the use of guns to commit crimes.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control In Mexico

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages

    T is true to say that anyone could act in any way with a gun, but gun control might just be able to prevent some of the crimes from happening. Gun control should be used to help protect the people and not to infringe on Americans…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most ineffective gun laws in place today is the gun free zones act, limiting where one can bring a gun. Gun free zones are an easy target for mass killers. Gun control advocates often fail to see that guns deter criminals. For instance, John R. Lott an American economist, political commentator, and gun rights advocate puts this law it into perspective in his article “Bans don’t deter killers”: “If a killer were stalking your family, would you feel safer putting a sign out front announcing, ‘This Home is a Gun-Free Zone’? That is what schools do" (par. 5).…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A. INTRODUCTION 1. Attention-Getter: A gun is to death as lighter fluid is to fire! How many of you agree? 2. Personal Credibility:…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Rights There’s two sides you can believe about gun control. You can believe that guns create crimes or that guns can prevent crimes. People on the side that believe that guns create crimes, want to increase gun control; make more laws that restrict gun possession in certain locations, type of guns and ammunition that can be purchased. People on the side that believe guns can prevent crimes, want a decrease of gun control; less restrictions considering the possession of guns, type of guns, type of ammunition, and locations. Some people believe that certified citizens with their conceal carry license are still not certified to protect themselves or others, that they might mistake someone for a criminal or shooter, and that it will produce…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Control Amendment

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages

    While the side that is against gun restriction laws says that this amendment, “...recognizes the inalienable natural right to self defense” (“Washingtonpost”). This discussion has become one of the most popular legal arguments being debated right now in the United States. In the year 2012 a study showed that the United States had the highest gun ownership rates in the world with there being 88.8 guns for every 100 people (“Washingtonpost”). Another study showed that ⅓ of citizens were armed (“Rollingstone”).This not even counting illegal guns obtained in the country.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control is Not the Solution Increased Gun Control in the United States is absurd, useless, and unnecessary. In order to increase safety all throughout the United States time and effort must not be spent towards limiting gun owners of their rights. The tragic rash of school, religious, and workplace shootings has turned up the heat on the public conversation about guns. In nearly all of these cases gun laws would not have stopped the shooters from obtaining a firearm.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control is Against Our Rights Do you think we should have less strict gun laws? Gun laws are restricting our rights to own a gun. You may have known that Chicago has the highest crime rate, however they have the most strict gun laws in the United States. We need to have less strict gun laws because people with guns could stop shootings, if they can't get the guns in stores they will get them illegally anyways, and the people are the ones doing the killing not the guns. If more people had guns they could stop public shootings.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He mentioned several cases in which people who were mentally unstable had guns and used them to harm other people. It is important to take into consideration all of the cases around the nation in which a man or woman shot and killed innocent people. Gun control does not decrease the murder rate, neither does it strip criminals of their firearms. It does not seem fair that the government will enforce gun control laws, but will not disarm criminals. In simple words, gun control will not solve the problem that is known as gun violence.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Gun control should not even be considerable, there should just be more background checks and even a longer process to own a gun. There are some circumstances where these crazy people do not have any kind of gun permit because the gun they own has been passed down from many generations in their family. Therefore, do not take U.S. Citizens’ right to own a gun or however guns they please because according the book Gun Violence the author used this quote “Most Americans are unaware that gun crime is lower today that it was two decades ago” (Merino,…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For a criminal to obtain a weapon with gun restrictions would require theft among citizens. Also, “Guns don’t kill people, people do.” The government should concentrate on the morals of their citizens and the position the media plays in acclaiming violence and the absence of respect for the law (Do We Need More Gun Control Regulations). Putting restrictions on gun purchase and use would cause more trouble than it’s…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control: Should There Be Limitations Guns should not be prohibited from certain people. Whether you believe it or not people should be able to have them because there are individuals that get killed every day. People have to be able to protect their families, and police don’t always get there every time and they can’t save everyone. For example, if someone doesn’t like you and knows where you stay at, they could possibly try to rob you or harm your family. If you have a gun then you can protect your family from danger, especially if you live in a poor part of your city, or the projects.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That not only will not decrease the number of criminals have guns, but also decrease the number of law-abiding citizens have guns, which make law-abiding citizens lose ability of self – protection. The more important thing is that sources of crime is the people’s thoughts and desires. Each of the shootings the killers was the person who shot, not the gun itself. The Government cannot simply rudely to solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “Our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Violence Solution

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the United States, there are about 89 firearms for every 100 people. This is almost triple the amount of any other first world country. The amount of homicides by firearm per 100,000 people is also 3.5 times greater than any similar country. There is clearly a strong correlation between the abundance of firearms, and the rate of violent crime. Strengthening gun laws would be a positive step towards decreasing the rate of gun violence.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays