Federalist Vs Democratic-Republicans Essay

Improved Essays
The two original political parties, the Federalist and the Democratic-Republicans had many different views on many different issues. They both had completely different ideas on how the government should be run. They both had completely different ideas on who should run it and how it should be ran. One of the issues they fought about was the difference of the ability between the wealthy running the government and the people running the government. The original political parties in American differed their views of a government ruled by the wealthy class vs a government ruled by the people. The Federalist party believed that the wealthy should rule the government and make decisions. Alexander Hamilton once said, “The people are turbulent and …show more content…
“I am not among those who fear the people. They, and not the rich, are our dependence for continued freedom.” said Thomas Jefferson once in a letter. They believed that our natural and true rights would be safe if only ordinary people were in the government. The Democratic-Republicans thought that if only wealthy people made decisions the people would get no power. They thought that the people would be more capable and successful with self governing then the wealthy would. They also believed that the voting qualifications should have been lowered to make it more fair for everybody. They believed that regular people needed to participate in government so that it would be fair for everyone. The two parties had different views on many things and this topic was one of them. This was a big issue between the two parties. Both parties had different wants for the countries. The Federalist wanted more control from the wealthy and the Democratic-Republicans wanted more control for everyone. They both had many different views on who should run the government. Both parties had many arguments on why either the wealthy or the people should run the government. There were many different views on rule by the wealthy vs rule by the people. The Federalist party and The Democratic-Republican party had many different views on many topics and who should control the government is a big

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    (Because George Washington was favoring a Faction.) 4.What were the difference between the first to political parties ( Views of The National Bank, roles of ordinary citizens in government, etc) (Alexander Hamilton began the Federalist Party which supported a strong central government and a national bank.)…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Soon after came to be two new ideas known as political parties which were the Federalist and Anti-Federalist. They fought from day one about everything including significant documents. Federalist and Anti-Federalist had many problems with each other which was known as the great debate. Stated in the new U.S. Constitution there isn’t security in the system for rights of people with ideas different than others or was their security for the liberty of the press (Document 2). The Legislative Branch which makes the laws that…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, the Democratic-Republicans told about how uncentralized the United States would be if they were under the federal during Adams's presidency. Republicans' agreed that they wanted to expand of the U.S. army and navy, undertake on individual rights in the Alien and Sedition Acts, and new taxes and decrease the spending money used to support many of the federal actions that were being done. The main thing the Federalists wanted was a strong federal authority to prevent the extras of popular majorities, while the Democratic-Republicans wanted to take away majority of the national authority so that the people could rule more through state governments and let it be brought to one as a whole…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While trying to ratify the constitution two parties were formed, the Federalist and Anti-Federalist. Now the Federalist wanted a strong government with a strong executive branch. Now the Federalist felt that the Constitution was fine just the way it was, that there was no need for a Bill of Rights. The Federalist also believed that only the elite and educated should be eligible to lead the colonies. Alexander Hamilton was a great influence with the Federalist since he believed that they should have a strong National Bank to manage money across state borders.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Short Essay One thing was clear during the convention of 1787, there were an astonishing number of viewpoints that clashed wherever they could. The main topic for debate was the distribution of control. Who would make the decisions for the people the state government or national government? The worry was that if the state government had primary control over the people's interests, who would police them? The Federalists wanted to make sure that the state government officials did not influence political policy to further their own interests.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamiltonians In The 1790s

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    They were anti-demos, and did not believe that the people were for the common good, believing that people needed to be vigilantly overseen. This group that followed the ideals of Alexander Hamilton, turned into one of two political parties: the…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite the lack of political segregation at the birth of the constitution, by conclusion of federalist John Adams’ presidency, two distinct parties emerged: the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. These political parties held opposing views on numerous topics including states’ rights, the power of the federal government, and most importantly, the interpretation of the Constitution. While both political parties signed to the laws written in the Constitution, the Jeffersonian Republicans are usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists. When the national government changed from the hold of the Federalists to the hold of the Jeffersonian Republicans during the Revolution…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dividing the parties almost completely in half were two groups with called the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists were more for a weak central government and more power to individual states, also their biggest argument was for a Bill of Rights. Now on the other hand the Federalists wanted a stronger central government and were against a Bill of Rights because they believed the government would give them rights. The Anti-Federalists main argument for a Bill of Rights was that there were certain rights that were guaranteed to people that the government should not infringe upon.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were two men who wanted change in the political party system. This is where the two new political parties were created, the Federalist party and the Democratic-Republicans. These two new forms of government brought new and different ideas on how to run a federal government. Most candidates of today still follow these ways of thinking, but their ideals are much less extreme, but also these ideas could be applied to some of the problems of today. Alexander Hamilton started his political career as an advisor to Washington during his presidency.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1787, the Continental Congress was brought together in the Philadelphia Convention to revise the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution was written and since people had different views on how to interpret it, two political parties were eventually formed: The federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. The main reason for the rise of political parties during the 1790s was because each of the parties favored different political and economical reforms needed as a new, developing country. Alexander Hamilton led the Federalists and they favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution, while Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic-Republican Party favored strict interpretation. The Federalists wanted to create a national economy by creating…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalists and Anti-Federalists The feud between the Federalist and Anti-Federalist party was based on the ratification of the Constitution. Even though both groups believed that the principal purpose of government is to secure individual rights and that the best instrument for that purpose is some form of limited republican government. They also agreed that the individual has the right to do anything that the government has no power to keep him from doing.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There were many other reasons that caused the creation of the two first political parties before the creation of the constitution like, Shay’s Rebellion which was caused by the poor farmers struggling to pay for their own land which ultimately lead to Thomas Jefferson becoming the spokesman of the poor and the opposition to the elite. Thomas Jefferson is most comparable to the former historian Howard Zinn, through his book The People’s History who focused commonly of the history and interest of the common classes or Howard Zinn likes to describe it as the, ‘meaner class’. The creation of these two political parties would lead to many advancements in government in the future like debates between for or against abortion in the 21st century between the Democratic and Republican parties. These two political parties influenced state 's sovereignty and the right to nullify like the Nullification Crisis of where the Tariff of Abominations allowed South Carolina an option to nullify and secede from the Union ultimately at a cost. The Bank of The U.S. lead to the creation of modern entrepreneurship to achieve the American Dream.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of political parties can be dated back to the pre-revolutionary Whigs and Tories that arrived to the colonies from Great Britain. As the need for a division in politics subsided, these parties became less official factions. However, when the issues of the territory began to change, the presence of factions began to change. The evolution of factions into rivaling political parties in the 1790s resulted from contrasting views between Thomas Jefferson’s Republicans and Alexander Hamilton’s Federalists due to different beliefs in regards to the Constitution’s power and the impact of foreign policy and economic growth on the young United States.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two of the major leaders of this group were Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, who was overseas during this time. The Anti-Federalists thought that under the Articles people had the rights that they rightfully deserved. Under the Articles, the poor people benefitted greatly. During the process of trying to get the new Constitution ratified the Anti-Federalists felt that under this new government the rich had all of the power instead of the people (Doc 5). Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    AJ Siciliano, Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists Essay Before the ratification of the constitution, two original political parties fell consistent during the 1700’s, Federalists and Antifederalists. In shorter terms, Federalists wanted a stronger central government to have overall power of the states, rather the Antifederalists wanted something similar to the Articles of Confederation, where the states as individuals, had more power than the central government. Both, although strongly contrasting, contained one main similarity, thirst for the creation of a new country, just with different ideas of how it should function.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays