Jeffersonian Republicans Vs Federalists

Improved Essays
Despite the lack of political segregation at the birth of the constitution, by conclusion of federalist John Adams’ presidency, two distinct parties emerged: the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. These political parties held opposing views on numerous topics including states’ rights, the power of the federal government, and most importantly, the interpretation of the Constitution. While both political parties signed to the laws written in the Constitution, the Jeffersonian Republicans are usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists. When the national government changed from the hold of the Federalists to the hold of the Jeffersonian Republicans during the Revolution …show more content…
However, in response to the Alien and Sedition Acts, Jefferson and Madison wrote the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, which spoke out against the Federalist Government. In these resolutions the duo claimed that the federal government had too much power, and that it (the power) must be returned to the states. In a similar letter to a future member of Jefferson’s cabinet, Jefferson wrote that according to the principles on which the Constitution was received, the states’ rights should be preserved (Doc A). The purpose of this letter was to persuade the audience, who was the future cabinet member, to support strict constructionist of the constitution, and to advocate for states’ …show more content…
When tension between Britain and Revolutionary France sparked the bloody Napoleonic Wars, Jefferson decided to comply by George Washington’s precedent of neutrality to avoid war. However, to completely remain neutral, Jefferson had to isolate the country by passing the Embargo Act under which he closed all of the American ports. The political cartoon, OGRABME, was created to expose how the Embargo Act demolished both the American economy and the entire merchant class(Doc C). Jefferson used implied powers to pass the Embargo Act, because he assumed total federal power and undermined the rights of the states. Likewise, Madison also endorsed loose interpretation of the Constitution throughout his presidency. The majority of Madison’s first term as President was served during the “Second Revolutionary War,” the War of 1812. Because the War caused many casualties, Madison filed a conscription bill to “re-stock” the American Army. However, this bill ignited anger from throughout the government. In a speech written by Daniel Webster addressed to the House of Representatives, Webster spoke out against President Madison and his mal-use of implied powers for passing an “unconstitutional” bill (Doc D). During his presidency, Madison also used broad constructionism of the Constitution in passing the Tariff of 1816 through Congress. This new

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    How did the elections of 1796 and 1800 show the political divides between the Federalists and the Democratic Republicans? In 1792 John Adams became president and he was in the Federalist Party. The Federalists supported the proposed constitution. In 1800 Thomas Jefferson became president as a Democratic-Republican.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    James Madison was elected fourth President of the United States in 1808. When he became President, Madison inherited the same foreign policy problems that went unresolved while he was Secretary of State when Thomas Jefferson was President. Madison was personally opposed to war and he did everything in his power to avoid it. First, he repealed the Embargo Act of 1807 which made illegal any and all exports from the United States and replaced it with the Nonintercourse Act. The Nonintercourse Act allowed trading with the United and all other nations with the exception of France and Great Britain who were fighting amongst themselves.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With respect to the federal Constitution, the Jeffersonian Republicans are usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists. To what extent was this characterization of the two parties accurate during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison? As war wages on in Europe, economic and political influence is spreading to America. As the President’s, Jefferson and Madison are challenged by upholding their country’s honor and putting their beliefs into action.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adams Vs Jefferson is the gripping account of a turning point in American history, a dramatic struggle between two parties with profoundly different visions of how the nation should be governed. The federalists, led by Adams, were conservatives who favored strong government. The Republicans led by Jefferson, were more egalitarian and believed that the federalists had betrayed the Revolution of 1776 and were backsliding toward monarchy. Jefferson and Adams continued to serve the country they helped create for many years. Adam was later the first United States minister to the Court of St James in England and Jefferson served as governor of Virginia and then a US minister to France.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, the Democratic-Republicans told about how uncentralized the United States would be if they were under the federal during Adams's presidency. Republicans' agreed that they wanted to expand of the U.S. army and navy, undertake on individual rights in the Alien and Sedition Acts, and new taxes and decrease the spending money used to support many of the federal actions that were being done. The main thing the Federalists wanted was a strong federal authority to prevent the extras of popular majorities, while the Democratic-Republicans wanted to take away majority of the national authority so that the people could rule more through state governments and let it be brought to one as a whole…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    War Of 1812 Dbq Essay

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas Jefferson and James Madison put forth their best attempts to prevent war with Britain and France for a number of reasons. For one, the United States was still a nation in its infancy compared to Britain and France, with no standing army at the time. This is supported by Andrew Lambert in his essay, "A British Perspective on the War of 1812" when he stated that the United States, once it was inevitably involved in war with Britain, "fought with whatever money, manpower and navel force that could be spared, no more than seven percent of the total British military effort" (Lambert). The United States was largely disadvantaged due to its lack of funds and military forces, therefore it desperately wanted to remain neutral throughout the wars…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Democratic-Republicans did the more effective job than the Federalist running the US, Thomas Jefferson is the main leader Democratic-Republicans. He created the Declaration of Independence and diplomatically fought for America. And all of the three representative presidents of the Democratic-Republican party made a lot of great decisions during their presidency, like the accumulation of land and handled foreign affairs efficiently. In general, Jefferson’s acts were more popular than Adams’s acts. Federalists policy shows preference to the rich and passed some weak bills that did not stand all the way up for rights of people.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Jeffersonians were very successful in achieving their goals of economic growth, expansion of land, and reducing military and naval power. The Jeffersonians vetoed the tax on whisky because it was enacted by the Federalist party. The Federalist party to the Jeffersonians were thought of as politicians for the wealthier. The tax on whiskey was a rouse from the federalist to increase their gains and hamper the common folk.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamiltonians In The 1790s

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The people of the Early Republic of the 1790s had very distinct, opposing views of one another on how the government should operate under a new constitution. These disputes stemmed from the adoption of beliefs from Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, who originally were highly opposed to factions. Their ideas were vastly accepted by two different groups: the Hamiltonians and the Jeffersonians. The many issues they disagreed on were nearly opposite one another, and ultimately lead to the creation of the first party system consisting of the Federalists and Republicans. Initially, these two men were very much against factions.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dividing the parties almost completely in half were two groups with called the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists were more for a weak central government and more power to individual states, also their biggest argument was for a Bill of Rights. Now on the other hand the Federalists wanted a stronger central government and were against a Bill of Rights because they believed the government would give them rights. The Anti-Federalists main argument for a Bill of Rights was that there were certain rights that were guaranteed to people that the government should not infringe upon.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 1780’s, two political groups arose in the United States of America. These two groups became known as the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The two groups argued over whether or not to ratify the new Constitution. The Federalists wanted to approve the new Constitution, while the Anti-Federalists were opposed to ratifying it. Anti-Federalists feared the new Constitution would make the federal government far too powerful, and take away too much power from the state governments.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1787, the Continental Congress was brought together in the Philadelphia Convention to revise the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution was written and since people had different views on how to interpret it, two political parties were eventually formed: The federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. The main reason for the rise of political parties during the 1790s was because each of the parties favored different political and economical reforms needed as a new, developing country. Alexander Hamilton led the Federalists and they favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution, while Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic-Republican Party favored strict interpretation. The Federalists wanted to create a national economy by creating…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of the group’s disagreements, they came to write explanations for their position in essay. These essays came to be known as The Federalist Papers and The Anti-federalist Papers. The Federalist papers had a main reason to convey the interpretation to the new constitution. While the Anti-Federalist Papers was pleading those who still secured their rights to allow discussion over the same document. By reading them, we learn that the Anti-Federalist did not think the new Constitution accurately explained the rights of its…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of political parties can be dated back to the pre-revolutionary Whigs and Tories that arrived to the colonies from Great Britain. As the need for a division in politics subsided, these parties became less official factions. However, when the issues of the territory began to change, the presence of factions began to change. The evolution of factions into rivaling political parties in the 1790s resulted from contrasting views between Thomas Jefferson’s Republicans and Alexander Hamilton’s Federalists due to different beliefs in regards to the Constitution’s power and the impact of foreign policy and economic growth on the young United States.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    AJ Siciliano, Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists Essay Before the ratification of the constitution, two original political parties fell consistent during the 1700’s, Federalists and Antifederalists. In shorter terms, Federalists wanted a stronger central government to have overall power of the states, rather the Antifederalists wanted something similar to the Articles of Confederation, where the states as individuals, had more power than the central government. Both, although strongly contrasting, contained one main similarity, thirst for the creation of a new country, just with different ideas of how it should function.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays