Intro Paragraph
For decades, schools have been debating whether to keep, or end after school sports. In many statics, kids who don't play after-school sports are more successful with their grades. Therefore, schools should eliminate sports so students can have time to study, reach academic achievements, and cut budgets.
Body Paragraph #1
As anyone who has participated in after-school sports knows, physical activity takes time out of a student’s day of studying. According to Amanda Ripley’s investigation, about 160 people attended parent-teacher night compared to 6 the year before (11). During her investigation, she had a conversation with Nathan, a former Premont quarterback who stopped playing school football and joined the football club that played only on weekends states, “There was all this extra time, you never got behind on your work (Ripley 11).” Therefore, not playing sports has lifted weights off of students’ shoulders and has created more time for them to study and to work on their given …show more content…
According to the article, Amanda Ripley states,”By suspending sports, Superintendent Ernest Singleton realized the district could save $150,000 in one year” (Ripely 11).”As Ripley's investigation goes on, it is told that”, “Distraction, however maybe the greatest cost of all” (Ripley 11). It is clear that sports are a big distraction to students and cause the school to spend more money than they should. Cost and schooling are creating a difference in our society as well as our schooling.
Conclusion Paragraph
Therefore, schools should not allow sports so students have time to study, reach academic achievements, and cut budgets. Sports affect the school and students academically greatly. To conclude, schools should end sports to prevent kids from getting hurt, have enough time to study, and to conserve
For decades, schools have been debating whether to keep, or end after school sports. In many statics, kids who don't play after-school sports are more successful with their grades. Therefore, schools should eliminate sports so students can have time to study, reach academic achievements, and cut budgets.
Body Paragraph #1
As anyone who has participated in after-school sports knows, physical activity takes time out of a student’s day of studying. According to Amanda Ripley’s investigation, about 160 people attended parent-teacher night compared to 6 the year before (11). During her investigation, she had a conversation with Nathan, a former Premont quarterback who stopped playing school football and joined the football club that played only on weekends states, “There was all this extra time, you never got behind on your work (Ripley 11).” Therefore, not playing sports has lifted weights off of students’ shoulders and has created more time for them to study and to work on their given …show more content…
According to the article, Amanda Ripley states,”By suspending sports, Superintendent Ernest Singleton realized the district could save $150,000 in one year” (Ripely 11).”As Ripley's investigation goes on, it is told that”, “Distraction, however maybe the greatest cost of all” (Ripley 11). It is clear that sports are a big distraction to students and cause the school to spend more money than they should. Cost and schooling are creating a difference in our society as well as our schooling.
Conclusion Paragraph
Therefore, schools should not allow sports so students have time to study, reach academic achievements, and cut budgets. Sports affect the school and students academically greatly. To conclude, schools should end sports to prevent kids from getting hurt, have enough time to study, and to conserve