Example Of Subjectivism In Ethics

Decent Essays
Introduction
What does subjectivism in ethics mean? Subjectivism means that in the least theories maintaining moral judgments are statements regarding the emotional or mental responses of the individual or the community. It can similarly mean that some of the theories holding that certain situations of thought or feeling are the utmost best. Simple subjectivism can be well-defined as the view of moral judgments that are true in relation to the individual to which who speaks of them. For us to say that a certain behavior is wrong, is to express one 's belief and not a recommendation. This composition is going to develop a theory of subjectivism and critically and analytically assess how persuasive and believable the argument for it is. I will
…show more content…
The first argument is the argument that ethical egoism endorses wickedness. This might be one-sided to ethical egoism because in saying that these actions are wicked, it takes up a non-egoistic conception of wickedness. The second argument is the argument that ethical egoism is logically inconsistent. It states that it is each person 's responsibility to do what is in their own best interest, but it is in the wrong to prevent someone from doing their duty. Therefore, the assumption with which we started that it is each person 's duty to do what is in their own best interest cannot be true. The last argument is that of the argument that ethical egoism is unacceptably arbitrary. This argument attempts to give details on why the interests of other people should matter to us. We should treat people in the same way, if there is a respectable reason not to. Ethical egoism is a moral theory that sponsors the separating the world into two classifications of people, ourselves and everyone else, and desires us to respect the interests of those in the first group as more important than the interests of those in the second group. This just indicates that we need to care about the interests of other people because their needs and desires are as well as to our own. (Rachels

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Claiming that the benefits of living in a society based on people’s rights and interest is a greater advantage then living without them. Even if you feel you could get away with it, an ethical egoist would claim it is too great a risk and will maintain the sort of society which they will benefit. The problem with this is that an ethical egoist cannot benefit in a world based on people’s rights if everyone also adopts the same way of thinking. How can you benefit from others if they are only out for themselves as well? In my eyes this is a world of chaos and cannot be adopted universally.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical egoism is a moral theory focused on improving a person’s well-being. There are many arguments for ethical egoism such as the self reliance argument and the best argument for ethical egoism, both presented by Shafer-Landau in The Fundamentals of Ethics. However, in this paper I will discuss how objections presented by Shafer-Landau and Dr. Thomas Carson are fatal to ethical egoism, while keeping in mind arguments for ethical egoism. I will discuss objections such as ethical egoism permitting or sometimes requiring murder, theft, or rape, in order to promote oneself’s well-being, egoists subconscious belief of their lives being more important than others, and an argument presented in class that if egoists must do what is best for their…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Final Paper Assignment My purpose in this essay is to explain why I believe that morality is objective versus moral relativism, which ethical theory do I ratify and the reasons behind why I do, and express how I would respond to a stranger’s objection to that specific ethical theory. Theory of Morality, also known as theory of the right, is concerned with identifying fundamental moral norms, rules, or principles in which actions are evaluated and may be deemed as right or wrong. In other words, this is explaining what you ought or ought not to do. Moral relativism is to say that there are no moral truths.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fairfax county 's code of ethics is supported by six core principles that honesty, public service, respect, responsibility, stewardship, and trust (Fairfax County). However, ADR office deals with addressing and resolving workplace complaints, where confidentiality, voluntary process, mutual agreements, and impartial third party are major ethical boundaries. I studied about theory of ethical relativism that emphasizes on people 's different standards of evaluating acts as good or bad. These standard beliefs are true in their particular organization or circumstances, and the beliefs are not necessarily example of a basic moral values. It also takes a position that there is no moral right and wrong.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Subjectivism is an individualized idea and all principles are right or wrong based on someone’s own ideas therefore there is no room for judgement. Similar to that is conventionalism, which is based on cultural principles as everything must be judged based on that cultures ideas. As stated earlier, they overlap as they both lead to the lack of morality, leaving ethical relativism incoherent. I would completely agree with Pojman as he talks about why ethical relativism cannot fully be supported by either subjectivism or conventionalism. I also agree with Pojman because there are universal values that may not be written down, but have the same meaning worldwide such as killing other people, telling the truth, and stealing.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nathanson is quick to condemn the Equal Punishment Principle because, for one reason, it does not lead to a “measure of moral desert” (as cited in Timmons, 2016, p. 539). Nathanson also condemns the Equal Punishment Principle because it does not result in a sufficient scale for knowing suitable amounts of retribution (as cited in Timmons, 2016). Nathanson elaborates on the second problem, stating that it is ethically heinous to make an individual pay for his or her actions by making them suffer the same way they made another individual or individuals suffer (as cited in Timmons, 2016). For example, Nathanson states that the principle could mean “we rape rapists” (as cited in Timmons, 2016, p. 539). Ethical egoism talks about the ethicality of something corresponding to whether the effects of certain behavior are enjoyable to every person but the individual participating in that behavior (Fieser, n.d.).…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Morality is the principle concerning between what is the right behavior and what is the wrong behavior. Each person has different set of moral views, that can be influence by personal feelings, a group of other people or by the care for humanities as a whole. As people grow and mature, they go through a moral development causing them to change their moral views. Many argue that moral development is impossible to achieve, but other have proven that moral development is possible. As an individual matures or is faced by a crisis that their current mode of thinking is unable to satisfactorily resolve, people move beyond their current stage.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A. Utilitarianism seeks to maximize good by minimizing harm to all while egoism seeks to maximize good by keeping the individual happy. As ethical egoism holds that moral conduct ought to be judged through self-interest. Egoism states that the good consequences for the individual agent outweigh the consequences placed upon…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Moral Outcome The army states in ADRP 1-0 "The Army" that, “The Army ethic is the evolving set of laws, values and beliefs, deeply embedded within the core of the profession’s culture and practiced by its members to motivate and guide the conduct of individual members bound together in common moral purpose.” There is an intense issue with this as the Army struggles to meet the bedrock requirements of a profession, chiefly that using the words evolving and deeply embedded in the same definition are at odds. We as a profession, have failed to state what our core beliefs and creeds are and in provide direction as to where we are drawing this drawing this ethic from.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical egoists say one should look out for their own self interest. John has many more self interests for helping his child than being honest to a stranger. Johns child may carry on his name, tell his stories, and one day help him when he gets old. John has no reason to care about what happens to David. John would be acting altruistically by helping his son, but ethical egoism does not completely condone altruism.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Egoism is the prescriptive theory that tells us in order to act moral, you should only act in your own self-interest. For whatever reason Cassandra has to reject the continuance of treatment, she was acting in her own self-interest. If Cassandra dies because of her actions, she will hurt many people, including her mother who stood up for Cassandra’s decision. But what Ethical Egoism states is that her actions were moral because Cassandra did refuse the treatment in her own self-interest. So regardless of how many people are crying at her funeral due to her actions, Cassandra’s actions were moral according to Ethical Egoism.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism vs. Objectivism There are two different theories dealing with morality, what is right or wrong, and what is good or bad. The theories discussed will be, ethical relativism and ethical objectivism. Ethical relativism is defined as having no absolute stance on a position; there is no right or wrong. Ethical objectivism which claims that some moral rules really are correct. What would it mean for ethics if there were no absolutes?…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Firstly, ethical egoism states that an individual should always act in their own best interest. Ethical egoism is based on the belief that people should act in a way that brings maximum benefits to the individual in making a decision. It also states that the behavior of the individual is to maximize their own self interest and effect on other people is of much less consequences. For instance, those government officials such as LTA officers receives bribe instead of charging the motorist for over speeding or drinking and driving just for their own benefits. They use the same money to buy the lunch or gifts for their family members.…

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The theory of ethical egoism would say “The morally right act, for any particular situation, is the act that will produce the greatest amount of utility for oneself” as quoted from the book Ethical Choices (Burnor & Raley, 2013 pg.100). Ethical egoism would also make the argument that the theory is not as selfish as it may seem there is nothing that prohibits someone from helping another person out, as long as the action produces utility for the person that is completing the action (Burnor & Raley, 2013 pg.100). According to ethical egoism their theory shows a great deal of selflessness and focuses on what most people would consider morally acceptable. Ethical egoists claim that their theory is selfless because we can still help people as long as the action supports our own interest. Kant has an idea that the morally correct action is the thought of moral duty.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural relativism may be defined as a theory that advocates the idea of subjective morality. To extrapolate, this theory entails that “different cultures have differing moral codes” and these variances are merely arbitrary. Although this is a seemingly sufficient theory, there are key issues with this school of thought. James Rachels suggests several issues with accepting cultural relativism. He criticizes cultural relativism by stating that the theory is absurd as it entails severe consequences if practiced.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics